'Vape' bans have little do do with public health

Status
Not open for further replies.

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
Especially when so many vapers feel that mandated regulations are okay with them.

Most businesses haven't had the choice as to whether or not to allow smoking or in certain areas in over a decade. That won't change. vaping is seen as akin to smoking; that won't change, either...
 

spartanstew

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 29, 2013
11,496
18,348
Wylie, Texas
And all of this can be accomplished by allowing businesses to make their own rules.

Absolutely, I'd have no issue with that.

Many folks, however, do.

Remember the uproar among vapers when Starbucks banned vaping inside and out? It was a perfectly logical business decision for them to make, but people wanted to boycott Starbucks (and other places) for doing so.

We can't have it both ways. If we want businesses to make the decision then we should accept those decisions or else businesses will want it taken out of their hands - and encourage government control.
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
Absolutely, I'd have no issue with that.

Many folks, however, do.

Remember the uproar among vapers when Starbucks banned vaping inside and out? It was a perfectly logical business decision for them to make, but people wanted to boycott Starbucks (and other places) for doing so.

We can't have it both ways. If we want businesses to make the decision then we should accept those decisions or else businesses will want it taken out of their hands - and encourage government control.


They only want businesses to have the power of choice as long as they make the 'correct' choice...

You should see the outrage on a travel forum I am on concerning the likely resolution of a proposed smoking ban in pubs and restaurants in Prague. Pubs and restaurants can decide whether or not to allow smoking and have a non smoking section if they choose to. Some have well-ventillated, enclosed smoking sections, so the sensitive tourists don't complain, others don't. Some don't have non-smoking sections at all. The likely resolution will be that all remains the same, but smoking restaurants and pubs will have to have a sticker on the window/door saying they are a smoking establishment. The nannystater tourists are outraged...
 
Where you can or cannot vape isn't the real issue here but what is is how vaping is being made to look. Some places you can vape some you can't.

But everything could change if and when the TPD comes into effect in the uk. It's hands off for now with the current government in the uk but this could be very different come May.
 

OCD

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jan 13, 2012
1,413
2,171
California, Kern
www.ibtanked.com
In reality vaping is more akin to breathing than smoking. What most dont even consider or understand is that air changes in a room at an alarming pace, even in a large room air from one side to the other goes into and out of folks many many times an hour and we are not restricting this to only coming out of mouths or noses. Add to this airborne viruses, bad breath, perfumes and colognes that could change the discussion to breathing areas where none of this 'other' stuff is allowed.

Most vapers are aware they can alter the amount of visible vapor they produce many different ways, this is the whole point. I can certainly understand why the next person would not want me decreasing the level of visibility in the same room as they are in just the same as I would not want them farting in said room. Being discreet to me isnt about sneaking a vape though I will admit I have, it is about being respectful in the same sense that I would cover my mouth if I sneeze. These are not things settled with legislation, they are settled through social norms.

The tough part of all of this is in the lack of evidence that there is anything harmful in exhaled vapor so why would there be any need in creating legislated behavior rules? This is something like regulating perfume on a basis of allowable ingredients and application dosage and quite honestly perfume is probably more dangerous than secondhand vapor. Certain foods like eggs, broccoli or beans can create 'conditions' that are far more obnoxious than a scented vape cloud even though it is invisible.
 

RosaJ

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 30, 2012
2,014
3,034
The Woodlands, TX, USA
I think such people are now starting to be the majority here.
And I've gone way past saddened.

This is why I very rarely check out the forum any more, I'm saddened and disheartened. Some people just love to drink the koolaid.

I personally resent anyone who breathes around me, just because I can't see their "cooties" doesn't mean I'm not breathing it in. If anyone thinks this is a ridiculous statement then they haven't really thought about the issue. I'm more afraid of invisible breath than of vapor or cigarette smoke for that matter. After all just because someone is out in public doesn't mean they're free of contagious airborne illnesses.
 

e-pipeman

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 16, 2008
5,430
5,594
Brown Edge, England
I agree with that, and that's why I don't go to smoking areas, but what's the other option???

Have businesses put in a second area just for vaping? Clearly you're not a business person.

The options are either to allow them to go to the smoking area or don't allow it at all. Take you pick.

No, those aren't the only options. And as for "Clearly you're not a business person." A rather crass assumption, don't you think?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread