Most things which are potentially dangerous carry warning labels, but they are generally regulated and require a warning label, or the seller of the item is smart enough to place one on the item...
Do you know how many people burn their houses down with 9v batteries? A fair number. They take a "dead" 9v and throw it into a drawer. The draw could be a cutlery or junk drawer full of items that can short the battery. Then they do to bed or work and pretty soon the drawer is on fire and it goes from there.
Battery safety is not limited to e-cigs, you can point to numerous consumer devices and battery designs that are simply an accident waiting to happen when the uniformed do something with that device or battery. It only seems to make headlines when its a vaper.
So, you're saying that most consumers, wanting to use an ecig, who are sold a high energy lithium battery, at a B&M, know that they are dangerous ....... in the same way that they know a knife is sharp and will cut them?
I learned about knives when I was about 3 years old. Unfortunately, I did not have much knowledge about lithium batteries until I started vaping.
I did make it my business to learn about them, mostly because I didn't want to blow part of my face off.
However, with the advent of ecigs becoming so popular, such a hot selling item, would you say that the man in the street, who orders a mod online with a battery that comes with it,, with no user manual, etc. is going to automatically know this?
In negligence lawsuits, "COMMON KNOWLEDGE MAY FURNISH STANDARD OF CARE". In the case of the woman who was burned with the McDonalds coffee, it is most people's common knowledge that coffee is hot.
However, if you read that case in detail, the coffee wasn't just hot (i.e. what I make in my mr coffee machine). It was hot beyond hot. You know, the kind of hot that even after you put in cream and sugar it's still ......scalding. In other words, you probably could not put to your lips. You would have to drop a few ice cubes in, etc.
I've had that kind of coffee before from a store.....and was unable to drink it, even after 15-20 minutes.
So "most people" would not assume coffee would be THAT hot.
The question becomes: is the idea that lithium batteries, in an ecig that you hold to your lips, are dangerous and require proper education and handling instructions------or is this just common knowledge that most people would already know?
IMHO, I believe that a better standard of care would be a B&M employee at least asking the person buying if they know how to properly carry a loose, single lithium battery. Because there will be PLENTY of people just over the age of 18 who will pick one up to go to a party or something, to "vape" and they really don't know these things.
I really don't think it's about stupidity as much as lack of exposure to the principals --- battery university is quite a long document......I read it!
I think you are correct it only takes a few seconds to ask some one if they know how to properly use a battery and not very long to educate them
We are cheating our selves out of knowledge, <snip> self reliance
A nine volt battery; I don't know what the chemistry of this particular battery is, but that "Not for Retail Sale" is something I've never seen
Some of us are asking for "very simple things". In 2012 I wanted disclosure if my ejuice had diketones. As a paying consumer, I didn't feel I should have to dish out $200 for lab testing to use a $10 bottle of eliquid.
Let's make it simpler........in your line of work, how many people have you "showed" how to use a fire extinguisher? (who werent' stupid).
Who is doing that in the vaping world? Joe Schmo who was working at dairy queen and decided to open an ecig shop? Who tells customers it's okay to charge over night on your bed stand? (plenty of those, believe me).
ECTA members are now doing this and I only order juice I can get certified testing for. This is an example of responsible business ownership and production.
Here we go again. Please research the McD's coffee case before rushing to judgement. As with our chosen pastime, sensationalistic journalism made so much out of that case that the comedians then got hold of it and made it even worse.
That woman was not driving. She was sitting in the passenger seat with the car in park. She tried to remove the lid of the coffee cup (Which were later redesigned due to the difficulty of removing) to add cream and sugar to her coffee. At that time McD's was serving their coffee at 170 degrees Fahrenheit, a temperature that causes third degree burns to skin in 3 seconds, not to mention would scald the mouth of anyone trying to drink it. McD's had already settled over 700 other cases of burns caused by their coffee, but had still not bothered to turn down the heat on their pots even though the head of their own quality control had warned them about it. The woman in question was prepared to settle out of court for the cost of her hospital bills, which included needed skin grafts, but McD's only offered her $800.00 iirc. Imho, she was more than correct in suing the pants off the company.
If every Tom, .... and Harry wanting to switch to e-cigarettes believed what the reporters write about vaping like they believe what was reported about that particular case, no one would be vaping.
so the facts are Mcd's served that coffee that hot because that was
the temperature that gave it the best flavor. the fact there were prior
complaints just means there were 700 other idiots that apparently
do not understand the concept of hot and by implication cold.
since man starting using fire the very first survival technique
a child learns is what is hot and what is not. the courts in there
divine wisdom simply chose to erase 50,000 years of human
evolution. did she complain on prior visits about the hot coffee?
back then as now they would gladly pop a few ice cubes in the
cup to cool the coffee down. it was common knowledge that
Mcd's coffee was hot. it is also not unreasonable to assume
that the concept of hot and cold is a universally understood concept.
with a priori knowledge of the concept of hot and cold the user of
hot and or cold products assumes the liability of proper handling
and care associated with said products. that is why the ruling
is wrong. one step closer to a society that has no concept of nor
desire to have personal responsibility.
mike
![]()
Just came across this picture on gearbest;
A nine volt battery; I don't know what the chemistry of this particular battery is, but that "Not for Retail Sale" is something I've never seen;
the red band around the thing is interesting.
The "Pb" I suspect means it contains lead.
And the clear warning "MAY EXPLODE OR LEAK IF RECHARGED OR DISPOSED OF IN FIRE DISSE........ "