Vaping Counter - any with a tally of Tar and CO avoided ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jdh5484

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 25, 2009
104
22
Anyone? Anyone?
ben-stein.jpg
 

jdh5484

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 25, 2009
104
22
...unless the banner-user knows the numbers and could put them in a form.



This is what I was thinking. If someone could come up with something where the user just inputs the mg of Tar and CO per cig of his/her brand. Then it's up to the user to find the info first (google).

So where you input the # of cigs per day, you also input mg Tar/cig and MG CO/cig. Then it's just multiplying the Tar * # cigs and you have mg of tar avoided per day. Actually, the program would need to use GRAMS, not milligrams since the number would get pretty big.

Example for me:
34 days smoke free
1,360 cigarettes avoided
19.6 grams of Tar avoided (19,600 mg)
16.8 grams of CO avoided (16,800 mg)
 

jdh5484

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 25, 2009
104
22
I know there is someone here that can make up this counter. I'll keep bumping until I find him/her.

Most counters already have a place for the costs savings. You input the costs per day and then the thing calc total costs. So the EXACT same algorithm/code can be used for the tar and CO (just change the wording).

Input: Date quit, cigs per day, grams Tar per day*, grams CO per day*

* grams (Tar,CO) per cig can be found by googling your brand - then just multiply the g/cigs x cigs/day.

Example for me:

34 days smoke free
1,360 cigarettes avoided
19.6 grams of Tar avoided (19,600 mg)
16.8 grams of CO avoided (16,800 mg)
 
Last edited:

jmanning

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 19, 2010
418
21
64
Amarillo, TX
If someone can build this sig-generator, I'll gladly host it on my domain for free with no ads and properly credit the author/creator.

Just throwin' it out there in case a lack of domain/host is holding up the creative process.

I'll play around with it. I can do it, it will have to be a java servlet or jsp.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread