What does "in-house extract" and "house extract" tobacco juice actually mean?

Status
Not open for further replies.

rondasherrill

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
May 19, 2012
2,247
1,941
Valhalla
Oops!

Thank you, Unforeseen for moving it!

That's what I suspected Spaceballsrules. Love your username!

Sigh. Oh well. I suppose I'll stick to non-tobacco juices then.

I didn't know that there was a forum dedicated to that! Thank you for the link!

Now, to add to this already complicated subject, Regular tobacco flavorings are not made by the same extraction as for instance, tobacco Absolute...

For instance, THIS FLAVOR is just a normal TFA flavoring that simulates tobacco pretty decently, just like cherry flavor doesn't come from cherries but simulates it pretty well, while THIS FLAVOR is a tobacco extract flavor.
 

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA
And people are just saying, you KNOW those cigarettes are going to kill you. If you expect someone to be able to say, oh my yes, e cigs are completely safe, that's not going to happen. There's no doubt in my mind they're safer, my body tells me that every day, but I have no way to prove it to you.

Besides, why would you expect the average person here to be able to answer these questions? Go to the horses mouth.

I think you need to reread my posts. You keep framing things in absolutes as if I claimed things I never did. I never claimed to expect vaping to be 100% safe, so you're preaching to the choir. I agree with you that it's probably safer than smoking, which is why I do it. I never said that it wasn't. We're in agreement on these points.

I don't understand why asking what's in ejuices bothers you so much. I'm just asking what's in the ejuice, that's all. Telling me that I ought to just be happy that vaping is safer than smoking so just stop asking questions already, that just doesn't work for me. I'm a curious person. I want to know if I'm taking a risk, what kind of risk is it? What is in this stuff? Wouldn't you also like to know what is in it?

As I said in an earlier reply, I want to know so that I can be an informed consumer and aware of the risks.
 
Last edited:

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA
Now, to add to this already complicated subject, Regular tobacco flavorings are not made by the same extraction as for instance, Tobacco Absolute...

For instance, THIS FLAVOR is just a normal TFA flavoring that simulates tobacco pretty decently, just like cherry flavor doesn't come from cherries but simulates it pretty well, while THIS FLAVOR is a tobacco extract flavor.

Yes, I'm aware of the difference. Thank you for the links.

It's a bit surreal to me now that they announce whether or not there is diacetyl in those flavors, but not whether there are any nitrosamines, which have been responsible for exponentially more deaths than diacetyl - but I wouldnl't be surprised if the reason why they do is because ECF members raised concerns over diacetyl, so now they inform us.
 
Last edited:

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA
Electronic cigarettes as a harm reductionstrategy for tobacco control: A step forward or a repeat of past mistakes? by Zachary Cahn and Michael Siegel is a comforting read. Table 1 shows which brands have been tested and what was found in them.

The brands tested show that those brands are very low risk. As a result, I'm going to try those, since now I know what's in them and precisely how risky they are. Unfortunately they mostly tested cartridges, and I no longer use them, but I'll consider picking up some now.

I read tobacco reviews all the time and I wish that the makers revealed whether there are nitrosamines and how much are in them, just like they do with diacetyl. May I also suggest (listen up juice makers!) that there may be a market for a good tobacco flavoring that has been proven to has zero or almost zero nitrosamines in it? Or other highly toxic tobacco compounds? I'll be the first to stand in line to buy it! Please please make this happen!

Nitrosamines were found in the tobacco and menthol flavored Njoy cartridges and the tobacco flavored Smoking Everywhere cartridges at very low levels, strengthening the suspicion that I had regarding the possibility that tobacco "flavorings" might be contaminated by other tobacco compounds (FDA, Table 1). The likelihood that natural tobacco extracts produced via infusing real tobacco is going to contain higher levels of N-nitrosamines is very likely, but we cannot know how high without testing. This may be a matter of some concern, and not just for health reasons. If the FDA does start regulating the vaping community, it will be over issues like whether or not there are the same carcinogens in our juices as there are in cigarettes. The FDA already started asking those questions years ago.
 
Last edited:

Mr.Mann

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2011
17,401
40,572
48
All over the place
I keep seeing this, especially with the words "natural" and "organic." I don't want to buy anything that has had real tobacco soaking in it, which is the image brought to mind by the phrase "in house extracts." Is that what it means?

The main point of contention with your concern is the part about "I don't want to buy anything that has had real tobacco soaking in it." NJOY IS NOT doing any "in-house," "house," or out-house extracts for flavor! The TSNAs that were present was not from any flavoring or anything like that -- it was from the nicotine. If you want to stay away from "anything that has had real tobacco soaking in it," then you are going to have to stay away from nicquids all together, or find some source that extracts nicotine from eggplants or some other nightshade vegetable (which don't exist for our purposes). No matter what house the extract is done, pharmaceutical grade nicotine is an extract of tobacco (most likely from a CO2 extraction). Luckily you can buy no nic, no flavor added, pure VG juice and vape that at low temps with few worries. Happy vaping.
 

Mr.Mann

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2011
17,401
40,572
48
All over the place
Taken from Ahlsuion's website Summary of changes and updates.

"Services:
Our GCMS (and MSDS) analysis options will be available to the public - if you need an analysis performed and certified, we can do so. Contact us for details. This service is mainly geared towards other vendors.
"

Also from Ahlusion's site What's different about your flavors?.

"...Similarly, our tobaccos do not include any artificial tobacco flavor notes (Tabanon/e) as found in some Perfumers Apprentice flavorings. Yet, many are simply used to this and prefer it better. I personally hate (stress) DK-Tab, M-Type and all the rest of them and also refuse to make eliquids for anyone with those - but that's beside the point. This is also a good time to explain the two types of tobaccos we currently offer: our flavored tobaccos and what we like to call aromatic tobaccos. All our tobaccos are based on organic tobacco extracts performed in-house through various methods to achieve the desired flavors. Our flavored tobaccos simply have other natural or organic flavorings, while the aromatic tobaccos tend to resemble various pipe blends, Burleys and so on. Another important point worth mentioning, is that our extracts are tested to be free of TSNA's and other harmful products/compounds generally found in traditional tobacco or cigarettes..."
 

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA
All I'm looking for is a practical and objective discussion about eliquid extraction techniques, eliquid ingredients, and their various risks or flaws or benefits.

I know nothing is totally risk-free and I'm not going to stop vaping.

I have always loved science. I like to know how things work. I'm this way about everything. For example, I can read a shampoo bottle and determine what 90% of the ingredients are and what they do. I can make most of the products I use. It is second nature for me when buying sunscreen to start with looking up research and monographs on active ingredients and information such as their degradation rates end up looking up albedo levels and it's relationship to skin exposure, to the various wavelengths of UVA rays and penetration levels through clouds and skin, and end up on DNA damage and cellular changes caused by UVA. As I said before, I'm a curious person and these subjects are actually interesting to me. What I'm trying to explain is that it is futile to try to convince me to not ask questions or think of these things. It's how my mind works.

It is equally futile to tell me not to vape. Vaping has kept me from smoking ever since I began in 2009. They are my life savers. I love it. I'm not going to stop. Period. End of discussion.

Let me make a comparison. If I go to an auto website and I ask questions about what types of tires are safest in various conditions because I worry about sliding in the rain or snow, the benefits or downsides of types of brakes, and the best types of airbags, I am not looking for reminders that driving will never be 100% safe or looking for advice about "how to take up public transportation" or "biking as an alternative," nor would those suggestions answer my questions or leave me better informed about brakes, air bags, or tires.

I believe that vaping is safer than smoking. Please don't bombard me about whether I should be vaping or not just because I care to ask about what is in my ejuice. It's a basic question that I'm sure some other people also care about. If it's not an issue you care about, then I'm happy for you! This is not the thread for you. It's not your issue or concern. I do care about it because I'm the kind of person who cares about things like what kind of brakes and airbags I have, even though I could still die in a car crash with those things. Reminding me that driving will never be 100% safe only increases my desire to learn more about brakes and tires and airbags, because those are interesting questions to me.

I am a well-educated and intelligent person who wants to look at this issue objectively. Please just let me have that discussion with others who share that concern or who have relevant information without the criticisms for merely asking what is it that we're vaping. This is a board designed for support.

The main point of contention with your concern is the part about "I don't want to buy anything that has had real tobacco soaking in it." NJOY IS NOT doing any "in-house," "house," or out-house extracts for flavor!

That was precisely my point, but I assumed that I made that clear. Let me elaborate so that there is no further misunderstanding. They only use a flavoring, yet it still had nitrosamines in it. This makes me not trust any tobacco flavored ejuice unless it has specifically been tested for nitrosamines because, as I suspected from my personal experience extracting various substances when I was a lab tech, that even just when the "flavoring" has been extracted, it may be contaminated by other tobacco substances, some of which could be dangerous. I thought that I explained this next part, but I'll elaborate further by stating that I concluded that if just the flavorings are contaminated with detectable amounts of tobacco carcinogens in ejuice, then steeped or in-house ejuices are likely to contain much more, but that cannot be known for sure without testing.

The TSNAs that were present was not from any flavoring or anything like that -- it was from the nicotine. If you want to stay away from "anything that has had real tobacco soaking in it,"

That isn't necessary and it's not accurate either, or you must have misunderstood what I meant. I believe that I elaborated to explain, but I'll clarify again here that I'm concerned specifically about toxic tobacco substances, not simply any substance that comes from tobacco.

To satisfy the nit-pickers just waiting to jump on this semantic point (not referring to you Mr.Mann, just heading this tangent off at the pass), I know that nicotine is toxic if enough is taken, as well as oxygen and salt and water, etc (insert eye-roll here). That clearly isn't what I meant either.

I'm well aware that nicotine is extracted from tobacco, but it isn't difficult to find sources for extracted nicotine that does not contain the cancerous substances that concern me because that is regulated. As I showed in my previous post, some eliquids have been tested for the substances of greatest concern and been shown to be free of them. That earns my trust.

Taken from Ahlsuion's website Summary of changes and updates.

"Services:
Our GCMS (and MSDS) analysis options will be available to the public - if you need an analysis performed and certified, we can do so. Contact us for details. This service is mainly geared towards other vendors.
"

Also from Ahlusion's site What's different about your flavors?.

"...Similarly, our tobaccos do not include any artificial tobacco flavor notes (Tabanon/e) as found in some Perfumers Apprentice flavorings. Yet, many are simply used to this and prefer it better. I personally hate (stress) DK-Tab, M-Type and all the rest of them and also refuse to make eliquids for anyone with those - but that's beside the point. This is also a good time to explain the two types of tobaccos we currently offer: our flavored tobaccos and what we like to call aromatic tobaccos. All our tobaccos are based on organic tobacco extracts performed in-house through various methods to achieve the desired flavors. Our flavored tobaccos simply have other natural or organic flavorings, while the aromatic tobaccos tend to resemble various pipe blends, Burleys and so on. Another important point worth mentioning, is that our extracts are tested to be free of TSNA's and other harmful products/compounds generally found in traditional tobacco or cigarettes..."

Oh that is so awesome! Good for Ahlusion! They just got a new customer. That is truely useful information and precisely what I was looking for! Thank you so much!

... it will result in more disease and death than if they had done nothing. The FDA's interference in supposedly free citizens' choices has probably killed more people than Josef Mengele.

I don't feel comfortable making claims regarding what would happen if the FDA became involved. I truly don't know. Since I can imagine a negative outcome that would make vaping more expensive or eliminate it as an option in public or make it difficult to get supplies, I hope that responsible choices by vendors won't make it easier for them to wedge that door open, however, there is also good reason for concern regarding an unregulated market, too.

Greed also kills people, which is the reason why even though I love vaping, I don't give vaping vendors 100% of my trust without evidence that they have earned a measure of my trust. Look at the tobacco industry, who didn't want to stop making money so they suppressed the information proving that tobacco kills, or the milk suppliers in China who killed all those babies, or the pet food suppliers who killed all those dogs and cats. They cared more about making a little more money than they did about being careful about what they put into their products. That's the reason why we need to stay vigilant.

I agree with MaxUT - not meaning to hijack your thread - just angry with how the FDA seems to be about regulating who gets to reap the monetary benefits of a product more then actual safety concerns. FDA = Financial Diversion Admin.

I did bring the subject up!

Money does corrupt. That's the only explanation for why certain pesticides used on tobacco plants that increase the likelihood of cancer haven't been regulated. It's a depressing realization.
 
Last edited:

Mr.Mann

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2011
17,401
40,572
48
All over the place
imogene, I really like the level of seriousness, amicability, and reason in the above post. I am not nit-picking here, but trying to clarify for you since you asked. In my first post, while it may have come off as passive aggressively tongue-in-cheek, my point was to try and tell you that tobacco flavoring is NOT from tobacco. In house/house/outsourced extracted tobacco and "tobacco" flavoring are completely different things -- think orange kool-aid versus freshly squeezed orange juice. Unless NJOY specifically says otherwise, which I know they didn't at the time of that report, they were using nicotine sourced from the far east (of course not regulated) showing signs of that from which it came. Also, what you've got to understand is that saying NJOYs "tobacco" flavoring is the culprit is not the closest bit feasible when you consider that NJOY ONLY sells "tobacco" flavoring -- no vanilla, fruit, or any others. The flavoring they use is probably outsourced and done on a massive scale that is all from a lab where nobody in their right mind would be using tobacco as an ingredient -- it would take too long, not cost effective, and probably harmful to the cartomizers (sediment). The nicotine is the only thing that NJOY uses that has ever come from tobacco and is no different than any other DIY flavor.

Very few people (if anyone) here is vaping NJOY anyway. ;)

p.s. I can't get some of your links to work.
 
Last edited:

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA
I appreciate the compliment.

However, I hope that all my posts sound reasonable. :2cool:

Go back and look at my post history. I believe that these kinds of questions and the interest in them helped spur development of products for people who preferred dripping, fluvium-free systems, longer lasting batteries, tank systems, as well as vendor awareness that people care about being informed about the presence of diacetyl. For example, when I joined people were just beginning to discuss concerns about what the fluvium was made of, including me, and just beginning to experiment with taking the fluvium out and dripping. Now there are products specifically for people who enjoy that.

Bringing up issues like this should spur discussion about how our vendors can provide the community with better products. Then they will. I've watched it happen. The members here drive the direction of the industry. Refusing to ask the right questions means that we won't get better products that meet our needs.

I am not nit-picking here, but trying to clarify for you since you asked. In my first post, while it may have come off as passive aggressively tongue-in-cheek, my point was to try and tell you that tobacco flavoring is NOT from tobacco.

Are you sure about that? In all ejuices? Do you have any sources to back that up? I'm interested in following the evidence. If you could prove me wrong (politely please!), it would make me very happy.

I considered this, especially since another interest of mine is perfumes. I think most people are aware that many ingredients are not derived directly from the source they're intended to emulate, however some ingredients are. The flavoring company websites I've visited have only used the word "natural" to describe their tobacco flavoring but they do not elaborate to specify that none of the constituents are actually derived from tobacco.

I tried searching for information. Unfortunately, most of the scholarly sources I have found so far investigate the harm of flavor additives that are added during tobacco processing to enhance the flavor, and I'm still looking for information and evidence of safety or risk. I hope that I find that it's safe.

This link from my last post shows that the FDA tested "each brand for the presence of tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNA) and found some in some cartridges from in both NJOY and Smoking Everywhere. The TSNAs could have come from contaminated nicotine rather than the flavoring. (Edit: I see that's where you were going with this too. We're on the same page.)

Without evidence that the TSNAs detected came from the nicotine or the flavoring, I am not willing to assume that it came from either one. Regardless, the same concern still stands.

Which brand isn't used in the US? I believe that both are.

There is at least one flavor additives that is added to smoked tobacco to make it taste better that is also a carcinogen. I didn't mention this before, but when I read about that in the first link I posted, it made me curious whether that one is found in any ejuices to help simulate the flavor of tobacco.

I'm not following you regarding "sediment." In the Harvard monograph I posted earlier, the product tested with the most TSNAs was Marlboro at 6260 nanograms total. A nanogram is a millionth of a gram. To imagine how small that is, keep in mind that a strand of DNA is about 2 nanometers wide, invisible to the eye and extremely small relative to the size of a full meter. Consider how much smaller a millionth of a gram is, a unit that is already tiny! 6260 nanograms of all the TSNAs in one Marlboro cigarette comes out to .00626 of a gram. It's doubtful that if you put all the TSNAs in an entire Marlboro cigarette into one ejuice cartridge that it would clog up the atomizer. An important thing to remember is that TSNAs are so toxic that second hand smoke is deadly, even though the TSNAs are present is such small amounts, relative to the entire size of the cigarette. I doubt that the units are actually that high in steeped juices. I was just making a point about the amount of TSNAs actually under discussion. Microscopic amounts are deadly, so I'm not comforted that there is a lack of sediment in my ejuice.

I don't want to be naive about the potential risks by taking the safety question for granted. There is abundant evidence that long term exposure to microscopic amounts of TSNAs has killed millions of people. To put this into personal perspective, I tried to quit smoking almost from the time I began and failed over and over again. Vaping got me off of cigarettes. I've already been vaping for three years. I'd like to keep vaping for the next 50 years and not die from my substitute habit 20 years from now. I want to be around to meet my grandkids.
 
Last edited:

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA
Very few people (if anyone) here is vaping NJOY anyway. ;)

LOL! I know! I was disappointed that so few brands I'm actually interested in trying were included. Johnson Creek was, although I plan on sending them an email with specific questions for clarification because I read their lab report. I might send an email to the lab that they used also, considering the fact that their lab reports were made public.

p.s. I can't get some of your links to work.

Which ones? I have clicked on all of them today. I only posted links that are publicly available.
 

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA
Johnson Creek is one of the vendors mentioned in that Harvard monograph, but not directly. One of their sources tested a cartridge from a company that was using Johnson Creek juices in their cartridges. That's how I found their lab report! They've been around since I began vaping but I've never tried any of their ejuices. I believe that they also provide ejuices for a lot of other companies, too.

Like the companies that announce diacetyl content and Ahlusion, Johnson Creek has earned a higher place in my regard.

Totally Wicked sells lab tested nicotine for DIY, which I have in my personal collection.
 
Last edited:

Mr.Mann

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2011
17,401
40,572
48
All over the place
I just skimmed through, but I am not exactly certain about what you mean by "mentioned...but not directly?" Are you saying that their products proved to be free of, or containing harmful substances? At any rate, I truly believe you are doing the right thing by investigating, but in the end, TSNAs will prove to be rare anomalies and probably not a real concern considering the amounts will probably be negligible. But, also remember that NETs are very much in the minority and most vapers haven't even tried that type of juice...

Oh yeah, JC is one of the original juice companies, if not the original.
 

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA
I was saying that from the monograph that it appears that Johnson Creek tested clean. The published summary didn't reveal very much, though, which is the reason why I want to follow up. I was looking up the companies that tested clean from that monograph and one of them used Johnson Creek ejuice in their cartridges, so in that way Johnson Creek was not directly mentioned in the monograph, but their lab report summary was one of the sources for the monograph. I already forgot the name of the company. I'd rather buy my ejuice directly from Johnson Creek since I prefer tanks over cartridges, besides which I would prefer to give them my business directly.

I hope that you're right. As a skeptic I think just because Johnson Creek and Ahlusion have been careful does not mean that all other companies are equally as careful. They might be owned by less ethical people. Some people would choose to sell a product that tastes and smells good for the profit at the risk of harming their customers. Just look at phthalates with the perfume industry, for another example, or the fact that some cosmetic companies still have lead in their red lipsticks. They won't be vigilant if we aren't. Just as you're certain that most companies' products are free from known harmful ingredients, and I hope that's the case, I'm certain that there are some companies whose products aren't.
 
Last edited:

Mr.Mann

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2011
17,401
40,572
48
All over the place
I was saying that from the monograph that it appears that Johnson Creek tested clean. The published summary didn't reveal very much, though, which is the reason why I want to follow up. I was looking up the companies that tested clean from that monograph and one of them used Johnson Creek ejuice in their cartridges. I already forgot the name of the company. I'd rather buy my ejuice directly from Johnson Creek since I prefer tanks over cartridges, besides which I would prefer to give them my business directly.

I hope that you're right. As a skeptic I think just because Johnson Creek and Ahlusion have been careful does not mean that all other companies are equally as careful. They might be owned by people who are less careful. Some people would choose to sell a product that tastes and smells good for the profit at the risk of harming their customers. Just look at pthalates with the perfume industry, for another example. Just as you're certain that most companies products are free from known harmful ingredients, and I hope that's the case, I'm certain that there are some companies whose products aren't.

Don't get me wrong, I don't buy juice willy nilly! I only buy from vendors who are transparent, professional, and willing to provide me with virtually whatever info I seek. That is why I started the thread http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...essage-e-liquid-vendors-what-we-want-you.html. If you haven't, check it out.
 

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA

imogene

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2009
75
20
Savannah, GA
The TSNAs that were present was not from any flavoring or anything like that -- it was from the nicotine.

Actually, something occurred to me this morning as I was sipping my coffee.

There is evidence that disproves your assertion.

Table 1 from the FDA report shows lab results for three flavors were tested that had nicotine in them (Tobacco, Apple, and Vanilla). The tobacco flavor was tested for both low and medium nicotine levels. The Apple (low) and Vanilla (low) flavors had no TSNAs in them, but the Tobacco (low) and Tobacco (medium) flavors both had TSNAs in them.

If the TSNAs came from the nicotine, then why weren't they detected in the Apple and Vanilla flavors? The evidence appears to indicate that the culprit is the tobacco flavoring.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread