Hence why i wanted to leave RBA as ReBuildable Atomizer... it is generally accepted as that, changing that would cause chaos... no idea if RGA is already being used as something else, if not I could see the uses, but at the same time Genesis/gennies should be fine, because to my knowledge there is no Genesis that is not rebuildable or designed as such (lets face it the protank is rebuildable but not considered rebuildable... so that is what i am talking about) RBCA rebuildable bottom coil atomizer ??? frankly whatever we land on for names for these doesnt bother me, telling someone that a rda isnt a rba does bother me...
-side rant- mods i mean no offense on this, but just like someone posting something in the general discussion and it being moved bothers me, or deleting a double post in different areas...
this bothers me because while there is more information in the sub threads, and people in them know what they are talking about, there is more activity in the general thread and while the information may not be as much, or the topic may get buried quickly... faster responses are more likely... there could be better results... i wouldnt mind having a topic in both, but i feel we should be able to post things in the general that apply to sub sections...
again i mean no offense just my opinion...
rant over...