Who says there is nothing we can do?

Status
Not open for further replies.

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
Folks, this is us he is talking about...
http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-tide-is-turning-published.html#disqus_thread

I think that the persistence and perseverance of harm reduction advocates, especially electronic cigarette advocacy groups and users, is finally starting to have an effect on public and scientific opinion. It would have been unheard of two years ago for a pair of articles to come out on the same day, both supporting the use of electronic cigarettes as a potential smoking cessation strategy.
But most importantly, it is due to the testimony and dedication of the actual users of these products - notably, the many electronic cigarette users who have been willing to share their experiences with the media, the public, policy makers, and the harm reduction community. Their message is starting to be heard. Despite the ideological and political/financial barriers posed by many leading groups in the tobacco control movement, the overwhelming experience of tens of thousands of electronic cigarette users cannot be suppressed or ignored forever.

We CAN make a difference.
We ARE making a difference.


For those of you who want to know what more you can do...

1) Educate those who know you use an electronic cigarette
2) Join CASAA to stay informed: Become a CASAA Member
3) Visit the Media and General News subforum to find articles where we can leave positive comments
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
This was a post made by the President of CASAA.

It was in response to a question about what someone might want to discuss with their congressman...

The most important thing you can talk about is what you know best--your own personal story about how e-cigs have helped you.

You can also say that you are concerned that there are groups that would like to see the product banned, and you hope that he will help keep the products available, effective, and affordable.

The FDA did its best to shut down the e-cigarette industry back in 2008 and 2009 when it began seizing shipments of products coming in from China, claiming that the e-cigarette was an unapproved drug-drug delivery device combination. After a legal battle in the Federal Court system, the FDA backed off on banning, but has announced that it wants to "regulate" e-cigarettes under the tobacco act (Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, signed into law in 2009). The problem with that is if they implement the exact terms of the law (which were written with combustible cigarettes in mind), they could ban the sale of any product that entered the market after February of 2007. There is a provision that allowed tobacco companies to apply for "substantial equivalency" status. The company would need to prove that the new product is nearly exactly the same as the ones marketed prior to Feb. 2007. Unfortunately, there was a deadline for submitting these requests built into the law, and it has already passed.

There is also concern that even if the FDA didn't move to shut down most of the business as described above, that they would apply unreasonable regulations that would be impossible for most companies to follow. They might impose regulations that would make the products less effective as an acceptable substitute for smoking, such as setting the maximum % of nicotine too low or outlawing all except for tobacco flavors.

Then there is the problem of the tobacco company user fees, which were based on multi-billion dollar corporations like RJ Reynolds. Nearly all of the vendors that participate in this Forum could by no means afford those fees.

Those are our worries at the Federal level. At the state level we have to keep fighting legislation proposed by the groups we refer to as the Anti-Nicotine and Tobacco Zealots (ANTZ). These include the Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, Action on Smoking and Health, American Lung Association, American Cancer Society, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, etc. For a while, they were proposing outlawing all sales, then it became a ban on indoor use (by including the use of E-cigs in the definition of smoking), and some have even suggested taxation.


By the way, the very least thing that every vaper should do is join CASAA.

It costs nothing, and it is very easy!
Become a CASAA Member
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
Hey guys, look at what we are fighting against...

http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/world-health-organization-urges.html

In a 2012 World Health Organization (WHO) report on electronic cigarettes from the Conference of Parties to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, WHO is urging countries to ban these products because they "normalize" smoking.

According to the report: "ENDS [electronic cigarettes] are products resembling cigarettes and could therefore undermine the denormalization of tobacco use upheld by the WHO FCTC. One of the guiding principles of the guidelines for implementation of Article 12 (Education, communication, training and public awareness) is Norm change. It stipulates that it is “essential to change social, environmental and cultural norms and perceptions regarding the acceptability of the consumption of tobacco products, exposure to tobacco smoke ...”. Parties are therefore invited to consider that a ban of ENDS as already undertaken by some Parties would contribute to changing the social norms regarding the consumption of tobacco products."

This is the kind of stuff you just can't make up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread