Why does battery affect performance?

Status
Not open for further replies.

DaveP

PV Master & Musician
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2010
16,733
42,646
Central GA
No, I get it, I just don't understand why they wouldn't allow it to go slower. It's max voltage is close to 6 watts. In the first scope image shown you can see the duty cycle is close to 50% meaning it's on half the time and off the other half. But you can lower the duty cycle below that. If for example you set a duty cycle of 25% that would put you close to 1.5V.. doing so you can go all the way down to 0V. You see what I'm saying? That's the beauty of pwm. As far as mean versus rms, that's just a difference of how you calculate the duty cycle based on the voltage you want.

Maybe the need for tiny boards and the availability of application specific micro chip circuits satisfies the specs for building a variable supply in the space allowed. It's pretty neat that all this magic can exist in something you can hide in your hand.

You could use a single PWM PS in a desktop supply to do what buck-boost converters do, but could you fit it into a square inch and output those voltages at 20W or more from a single LiMn battery source?
 

rusirius

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 8, 2014
615
1,183
DE
Maybe the need for tiny boards and the availability of application specific micro chip circuits satisfies the specs for building a variable supply in the space allowed. It's pretty neat that all this magic can exist in something you can hide in your hand.

You could use a single PWM PS in a desktop supply to do what buck-boost converters do, but could you fit it into a square inch and output those voltages at 20W or more from a single LiMn battery source?
But that's just it. They already have the supply, which supplies about 6v. How the "apply" lower voltages isn't by actually lowering the voltage. What they do is turn it on and off really fast. So if it's turned on all the time it's 6v, turned on half the time it's an effective 3v. So they already have all the circuitry needed. It's just a simple programming change to allow the "off" time to exceed 50 percent.
 

rusirius

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 8, 2014
615
1,183
DE
But that's just it. They already have the supply, which supplies about 6v. How the "apply" lower voltages isn't by actually lowering the voltage. What they do is turn it on and off really fast. So if it's turned on all the time it's 6v, turned on half the time it's an effective 3v. So they already have all the circuitry needed. It's just a simple programming change to allow the "off" time to exceed 50 percent.
Think of it this way. If I wire an LED up to the output pin of an mcu that outputs say 5v. If I leave then pin on all the time the led lights at maximum brightness. If I cycle it on and off really fast on 75 percent and off 25 percent then it lights at 3/4 brightness. Half the time half the brightness, leave it on only 25 percent of the time and it's only one quarter brightness, keep going extending the off time and it gets dimmer and dimmer. But because it's cycling so fast it appears to be lit constantly even though it's really flashing very quickly, that's how pwm works.
 

TyPie

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 13, 2013
847
1,154
New Joisey (aka NJ)
Yep! And in some circles the Fender tube head would win because it's Fender, tube, and old!

And there always the difference in biasing, preamp tubes, and tone circuits and effects loops. I remember reading about an extensive test where musicians and recording engineers were seated in a studio and were told to listen to the same guitar player behind a half wall through three amplifiers and determine whether each were tube or solid state. Almost all missed the mark on the one they determined to be a tube amp.

I play through a hybrid guitar amp these days. It's a Peavey Vypyr Tube 60. The front end is digital, with a 12ax7 preamp followed by a dual 6L6 output stage. I swapped out the 6L6's with a pair of KT88's. Both sound good, but I've convinced myself that the KT88's beat the 6L6's on presence, overall tonal balance, and feel. That may be hogwash, but it makes me happy when I play it!

Oh, and a clean car drives better. :)

BUT, then you have to REALLY consider, shall I use the Les Paul gold top deluxe, or the Fender American Fat Strat, to really fine tune the thing, no?? :D


(Oooops, sorry to go a lil' off-topic here.)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread