Why don't people want e-liquid labels changed?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jode

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 9, 2014
1,083
4,419
61
Seabrook, NH, USA
:|
And where did i say it was not ok for another here to disagree? where did i do anything other then share my opinion on the matter just like you did...but yet it seems you are the one that has the problem with practicing what you preach about allowing others to have opinions that disagree with your's. I have not singled you out directly and taken issue with your opinions personally until now, so again where is all of this coming from? We have a topic here and we are all sharing our opinions on the topic.
You want to respond to my opinions fine, but if your going to get nasty about it then your opinion is not worth my time to read or respond to Jode going forward.

Furthermore, clearly my post was in RESPONSE to answering another poster regarding the colored vapor Jode..how could one miss it?..yet you tell me to trust that people actually read the whole thread when clearly in this case they didnt even read the post i was responding to that was attached to my responding post.
Honestly I still can not figure out, regardless if one did not read what i was responding to, how it was not clear that i was speaking about something that was harmful and how misuse of vaping like that would result in misplacing blame on vaping for the health problems it would cause...

Thing is i didn't make a big issue about it or accuse the poster of purposely doing it because it may have been a innocent mistake..SO WHY ARE YOU MAKING A ISSUE OUT OF THIS?...please stop

Haha, I guess I should have seen that coming. If you reread my post you will see I didn't say that you said it was not ok to disagree. I took a presumptuous role, unfortunately, and was just trying to let you know that your opinion is highly important even when people disagree with it. In otherwords, if I disagree with your stance it is in no way an attack on you as a parent. Get it now? I guess this is where I get my need to be wordy sometimes because if people make simple statements it gets other peoples panties in a knot. You are more then welcome to single me out and take issue with anything I say here because that is the purpose of this type of discussion. Who knows, I may take point with something you say and change the way I look at things. Or I may fire back and stand strong. We will never know if we do not take issue with others points. I was unaware of any rule that allows me to only take issue with those that take issue with me, so where it is coming from is that I was just wanted to reply to your post about colored vapor, but wanted to make sure I included all posts it covered. I don't know how this comes off as that I have a problem practicing what I preach. I value other opinions greatly and when I feel misunderstood I try to make my position clearer but I always try to let the person or people I am discussing things with that even though our opinions differ, that I value them and I hope it also in reverse. The part I put in reddish bothers me a little (certainly not worth an argument, but worth pointing out), because I always try to make sure I am not being nasty. Could you show me where you felt I was nasty? :blink:

As to the second part of your response, both (all) of the posts in question were clear that it was "colored" second hand vapor that was being discussed. I am not in Rossums or anybody elses mind here but I think the eye roll (mine was anyways) was due to a lack of proof that colored vapor (if it even exists) is any different then regular vapor, thus taking issue with your words of warning. :danger: How do you know this is harmful (in blue) or a misuse of vaping. I have seen trickster vaping similar to what you mention and it is (from what I have experienced) done with lighting. And some people have real cool control of their mouth to make fun clouds. This is something fun the younger generation is doing to entertain themselves. Again, however, it is your call on what you want your kids about. I just don't care for any statements that conclude that this is dangerous without proof or even some evidence. Now if this was a group of youngsters not following battery safety then I would definitely agree that it was careless, and scary but I cannot police all kids. All I can do is continue to call for newbs to research and be safe. Last but not least, when I refer to kids or youngest generation when I speak of vaping I am talking about young adults of age.

If I upset you, I apologize. It is far harder to make a point in print then it is in actual conversation.:vapor::|
 

Jode

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 9, 2014
1,083
4,419
61
Seabrook, NH, USA
So lets ban everything that can hurt a kid? Seriously? Do you realize how much that would encompass? Detergent, especially detergent pods. Over the counter medication, certain foods, alcoholic beverages, cigarettes, cars, bicycles..sheesh I'm going to stop here. You get the idea.

I agree also about the colored vapor and feel compelled to say "Pics or it didn't happen." I haven't found anything at all, and once I read someone ask here I started looking because it was wondering I wished I could do, depending on what causes it. LED lights were the only thing I could think of after not finding anything.

Also, I don't know about anyone else. I'm 28 and I really enjoyed the latest Spongebob Movie, along with many other animated movies and shows/cartoons. With that said, kids also like looking mature. They could easily be drawn to that label they see that looks mature on a tasty juice?

You are not alone. When I was young I wanted to use and do adult looking activities. My parents kept me as safe as they could by teaching me about what they felt was harmful for me. As an adult working my way down the other side of that hill I seek out fun things to do in down time. Real life is so freaking serious that I think a little "spongeBob" is needed in everybody's life for balance. I agree that labels are not what attracts the kids to adult activities.
 

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,232
SE PA
Honestly I still can not figure out, regardless if one did not read what i was responding to, how it was not clear that i was speaking about something that was harmful and how misuse of vaping like that would result in misplacing blame on vaping for the health problems it would cause...
Where's your evidence that it's harmful? Heck, where's you're evidence that it even exists?
 

KattMamma

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2015
1,733
6,442
DFW Area, Texas
Do you think the regulators are not already well aware of what is going on and gathering this info to use against us if it doesn't stop.
I think the regulators and politicians are going to do whatever it takes to protect THEIR INTERESTS. They don't care about your kids (if they did, they would support vaping, because teens are turning to vaping INSTEAD of smoking, and we KNOW vaping is far safer).

I haven't been vaping long, but I have been fighting the nanny state for most of my adult life. Politicians are very good at using "the children" angle to get what they want. By using "the children" they can garner support for their evil deeds based on emotion - they don't want you to use logic or look at facts.

And changing labels, or giving in to other demands, is not going to make them back off - it will just strengthen their position because it makes it look like vapers are agreeing that vaping is dangerous and needs to be regulated if not outright banned.

I'm fine with juice makers voluntarily changing their labels - and support their right to do so, just like I support their right to put cookies or cartoon characters on the label.

Is the Energizer Bunny used to market batteries to kids? I think not.
 

KattMamma

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2015
1,733
6,442
DFW Area, Texas
But he never, ever put things in his mouth, for a very good reason: I told the nurses in the nursery of the of hospital where he was born that if they put a pacifier in his mouth, I would come and personally kick every one of their butts. He never got the idea of putting *things* in his mouth -- only food and drink. Never objects.
WOW - I didn't even think about the pacifier angle! I hated those things and didn't use them either. Other than wanting something to gnaw on when she was teething, she didn't put things in her mouth either.... Hmmm....
 

KattMamma

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2015
1,733
6,442
DFW Area, Texas
@caramel - I know you're right! They want us just smart enough, and just healthy enough, to stay busy working and paying the light bill and grocery bill... but not smart enough or healthy enough to fight back against what they're doing to our freedoms.

When I was in high school, Orwell's 1984 was required reading (Animal Farm too)... now, I am pretty sure it's not read, and wouldn't be surprised to find out it's banned. Or burned, a'la Fahrenheit 451.
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
WOW - I didn't even think about the pacifier angle! I hated those things and didn't use them either. Other than wanting something to gnaw on when she was teething, she didn't put things in her mouth either.... Hmmm....

I think I actually got that idea from my well-thumbed "Dr Spock" (which I read in its entirety while I was pregnant!)... and also because if I see another 4 yr old in the supermarket with a pacifier I may have a screaming hissy fit. :D But it certainly worked; it was as though the idea of putting things in his mouth which weren't edible just never occurred to him -- at all. :thumbs:

Andria
 

DeAnna2112

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 21, 2015
817
1,732
Indiana
:|

Haha, I guess I should have seen that coming. If you reread my post you will see I didn't say that you said it was not ok to disagree. I took a presumptuous role, unfortunately, and was just trying to let you know that your opinion is highly important even when people disagree with it. In otherwords, if I disagree with your stance it is in no way an attack on you as a parent. Get it now? I guess this is where I get my need to be wordy sometimes because if people make simple statements it gets other peoples panties in a knot. You are more then welcome to single me out and take issue with anything I say here because that is the purpose of this type of discussion. Who knows, I may take point with something you say and change the way I look at things. Or I may fire back and stand strong. We will never know if we do not take issue with others points. I was unaware of any rule that allows me to only take issue with those that take issue with me, so where it is coming from is that I was just wanted to reply to your post about colored vapor, but wanted to make sure I included all posts it covered. I don't know how this comes off as that I have a problem practicing what I preach. I value other opinions greatly and when I feel misunderstood I try to make my position clearer but I always try to let the person or people I am discussing things with that even though our opinions differ, that I value them and I hope it also in reverse. The part I put in reddish bothers me a little (certainly not worth an argument, but worth pointing out), because I always try to make sure I am not being nasty. Could you show me where you felt I was nasty? :blink:

As to the second part of your response, both (all) of the posts in question were clear that it was "colored" second hand vapor that was being discussed. I am not in Rossums or anybody elses mind here but I think the eye roll (mine was anyways) was due to a lack of proof that colored vapor (if it even exists) is any different then regular vapor, thus taking issue with your words of warning. :danger: How do you know this is harmful (in blue) or a misuse of vaping. I have seen trickster vaping similar to what you mention and it is (from what I have experienced) done with lighting. And some people have real cool control of their mouth to make fun clouds. This is something fun the younger generation is doing to entertain themselves. Again, however, it is your call on what you want your kids about. I just don't care for any statements that conclude that this is dangerous without proof or even some evidence. Now if this was a group of youngsters not following battery safety then I would definitely agree that it was careless, and scary but I cannot police all kids. All I can do is continue to call for newbs to research and be safe. Last but not least, when I refer to kids or youngest generation when I speak of vaping I am talking about young adults of age.

If I upset you, I apologize. It is far harder to make a point in print then it is in actual conversation.:vapor::|


I appreciate you taking the time to respond Jode and yes, i think i did read your initial comment in your post wrong and apologize for my misunderstanding. I tend to be wordy as well in case nobody noticed (smiles and slides back into computer chair). I think it comes from having two teens and having to explain myself in an expanded version on everything...yet they still tell me I KNOW MOM I KNOW...yet they do the exact opposite of what i asked.
I think we are all on the same page when it comes to vaping, but that doesn't mean we always agree on things that the vaping community does. I basically stand here on the issues

No i don't think there should be any marketing/packaging in any way that appeals to children or teens.
No i don't think we should be selling to minors.
No i don't think we should be vaping in indoor public places and forcing our choice to vape on others.
No i do not believe there should be nicotine regulations
No i do not believe there should be flavor regulations
No i do not believe there should be device regulations
No cloud chasing competitions should not be banned, though it does look bad at times for the rest of us.

Yes i also support regulated measures that reduce the potential for harm to children. I think they have just as much right to protective measures that minimizes harm to their health in the event their parents bring nicotine into their home and fail to protect them, as should a smoker who is looking out for their health have the right to vape as a harm reduction alternative to smoking.

IMO it's not a matter of what we think might or might not happen in whatever case scenario, if a child is on the floor dead and a poisonous liquid with papa smurf on the label is in their hand, is one going to say nah papa smurf had nothing to do with why they even picked that bottle up?. On the flip side, it is also true that if papa smurf was not on that bottle, they may have still picked that bottle up...but the likely hood of them picking it up increases dramatically with papa smurf on it. Surely nobody disagrees with that analysis i hope.

Yes, many children are fortunate enough to have responsible parents, but those children are not the one's that we need to worry about unfortunately. Yes the irresponsible parents are to blame, no arguing with that, but what about the child who suffers as a consequence. No we can not control that, but we can do our part and support measures that would provide some added layer of prevention to help protect these children when their parents fail them.

Now my comments about the teens and how they decorate their devices was meant to point out that we don't need studies to know what they are attracted to and associate with...So why are some in the vaping industry using these kinds of marketing tactics to market their vaping products.. regardless if some of it may appeal to some adults?....better question is why are most in the vaping industry NOT marketing in this way?
Yes, teens can print these things out, draw them and so forth, but i am not sure what point that makes in response to my earlier post. This is about how an adult product is being marketed, one that has the potential to cause harm or death especially in the hands of a typical irresponsible teen, not whether teens can print out labels or stickers.
 

caramel

Vaping Master
Dec 23, 2014
3,492
10,735
Can you explain why, of all methods that irresponsible parents could use to harm their own children, only vaping (which hasn't even been proved as being harmful and/or addictive) needs the full attention and interference of the government, down to the exact style of the graphics on the packaging?
 

Jode

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 9, 2014
1,083
4,419
61
Seabrook, NH, USA
I appreciate you taking the time to respond Jode and yes, i think i did read your initial comment in your post wrong and apologize for my misunderstanding. I tend to be wordy as well in case nobody noticed (smiles and slides back into computer chair). I think it comes from having two teens and having to explain myself in an expanded version on everything...yet they still tell me I KNOW MOM I KNOW...yet they do the exact opposite of what i asked.
I think we are all on the same page when it comes to vaping, but that doesn't mean we always agree on things that the vaping community does. I basically stand here on the issues

No i don't think there should be any marketing/packaging in any way that appeals to children or teens.
No i don't think we should be selling to minors.
No i don't think we should be vaping in indoor public places and forcing our choice to vape on others.
No i do not believe there should be nicotine regulations
No i do not believe there should be flavor regulations
No i do not believe there should be device regulations
No cloud chasing competitions should not be banned, though it does look bad at times for the rest of us.

Yes i also support regulated measures that reduce the potential for harm to children. I think they have just as much right to protective measures that minimizes harm to their health in the event their parents bring nicotine into their home and fail to protect them, as should a smoker who is looking out for their health have the right to vape as a harm reduction alternative to smoking.

IMO it's not a matter of what we think might or might not happen in whatever case scenario, if a child is on the floor dead and a poisonous liquid with papa smurf on the label is in their hand, is one going to say nah papa smurf had nothing to do with why they even picked that bottle up?. On the flip side, it is also true that if papa smurf was not on that bottle, they may have still picked that bottle up...but the likely hood of them picking it up increases dramatically with papa smurf on it. Surely nobody disagrees with that analysis i hope.

Yes, many children are fortunate enough to have responsible parents, but those children are not the one's that we need to worry about unfortunately. Yes the irresponsible parents are to blame, no arguing with that, but what about the child who suffers as a consequence. No we can not control that, but we can do our part and support measures that would provide some added layer of prevention to help protect these children when their parents fail them.

Now my comments about the teens and how they decorate their devices was meant to point out that we don't need studies to know what they are attracted to and associate with...So why are some in the vaping industry using these kinds of marketing tactics to market their vaping products.. regardless if some of it may appeal to some adults?....better question is why are most in the vaping industry NOT marketing in this way?
Yes, teens can print these things out, draw them and so forth, but i am not sure what point that makes in response to my earlier post. This is about how an adult product is being marketed, one that has the potential to cause harm or death especially in the hands of a typical irresponsible teen, not whether teens can print out labels or stickers.

I really wish I had more time to respond to this. I might be able to come back to it, but I did want to respond a bit while it was fresh in my head. What I am about to comment on is just food for thought. I am not trying to say my way is right or your way is wrong but I have a couple of questions. Why do you think cloud comps (quote in blue) makes us look bad? They are held in locations that are vape friendly with like minded folks and quite fun. How does any regulation (with exception to age restriction) help safeguard children? (green quote)People can leave childproof caps off. If a parent is irresponsible I doubt very much that there is any regulation that will help their children. (orange quote) Oh you bet your bottom dollar I disagree with that analysis. All people (children included) are drawn to all sorts of things, some kids like clowns, some are deathly afraid of them. MY five year old grand daughter is very drawn to bugs. The grosser the better. My 1 1/2 yr old grandson (her brother) wouldn't want anything with a bug near him never mind be drawn to it. I just don't think it is inherent that all children would be drawn to papa smurf or an animated cookie or any specific thing. Now if I know my child loves (I will use a benign image) bumblebees and I have a bottle of ejuice with bumblebees all over it then it is my responsibility to block access to it. My point being is that just because it looks kidlike to you doesn't equal kids being drawn to it. And all I have time for is the last in pink which goes with the last bit. I don't think there is a responsible parent out there that doesn't wish we could help the children that are born into unfortunate situations. Often times however, measures put in place to protect them are a double edged sword. Just look at how the whole spanking thing went way out of control in the 70's. We wanted to protect those kids in bad situations but what we signed onto created a world in which if you even use the "Just wait till we get home" phrase as a behavior adjustment then any nosy body can report you. I remember in the 80's there was a single Dad in a Kmart that had uttered to his unruly child something to the effect of "If you do that again, I will strangle the life out of you." He was clearly frustrated and lost his cool but somebody decided they needed to protect his child and reported to the store manager, who then called the police and it went on till his kids were taken. It got resolved after an investigation and the children were returned to him but of course it stayed on his record and probably marred his kids to a certain extent. As I said previously, a childproof cap can be left off just as easily as any number of potential dangers can be left exposed to the sad kids that have nobody watching them. The layer then just becomes a nuisance for responsible adults. I have to also add that a lot of people that vape are previous smokers who were exposing kids around them with second and third hand smoke whether or not they like to admit it. If they have switched to vaping they have greatly reduced (IMO) the harm they are putting all around them in. Sorry but this is all I have time for today. Enjoy the rest of the weekend.
 

Cacique

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 4, 2014
783
490
Orlando, FL
If kids under 18 aren't allowed in a vape shop, it's not marketing to them. The labels and all that are only seen by those who go to the shop. Any exposure from seeing a parent with it or something is the same as liquor. Even if it looks interesting and tastes good, the kid can't go and pick some up.
 

ItsJustJason

Full Member
Jun 14, 2015
9
5
53
My youngest child is 10 yrs old. If I have to make a quick stop at a B&M, I will leave her in the car for the few minutes it takes me to run in and grab what I need. I was at a B&M 2 days ago and left my daughter in the car to grab some juice, when I walked into the store a father and his child were in the store. The child must have been around 6 yrs old or so but when the owner greeted me I said out loud that I do not agree with a child being in this store and turned around and walked out. Now I shop in this store all the time, so the owner came out as I was getting into my car. I told her that this is why vaping is getting banned from happening in vape shops and I will not support a store that allows children to step foot in the door.

Do we really care what is on the label? In fact when I see a more professional label it tells me the company really takes pride in their juice. I know these juice companies are not making the label to attract children but the FDA does not see it that way. The FDA does not want cartoon type labels and if I get to continue to vape because all labels are brown paper bag colored with plain black font, I'm perfectly fine with that. I have NEVER chosen a juice because of the label, not a single time. It's whats inside the bottle what matters most to me.

I believe in creativity and free market capitalism but the FDA regulations are coming! As a community we must make 100% sure that the perception of marketing to children is cleaned up. Would you give up cartoon labels to move the grandfather date up to April 2015? It's gonna be a give and take with these ........s!
 

KattMamma

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2015
1,733
6,442
DFW Area, Texas
Would you give up cartoon labels to move the grandfather date up to April 2015?
I'd have to think about that - because while we'd get to keep what we have, the odds of anything better ever coming to market would be between slim and noe.

It's gonna be a give and take with these ********s!
I saw how this went down with cigarettes - with vaping it's even worse (more lies, more manipulations, more hidden agendas). There really isn't much give and take - unless you mean we give, they take.
 

ItsJustJason

Full Member
Jun 14, 2015
9
5
53
I agree with all of you in regards to "Big Government" keeping their filthy hands off my freedom, but that's not how this is going to go down. In the perfect world, the FDA would leave us alone, but to think the FDA is simply going to lay down for US, nope. If we are lucky they will move the grandfather date to April 2015 and allow small juice manufactures to exist, but even that I have serious doubts about. These are not normal people, there is BIG MONEY in cigarette tax revenue and the community has grown to a point where we have become a threat.

Don't think for one minute I don't want the same things as you, I just have had dealings with the FDA from a business standpoint and common sense need not apply.

We have to choose our battles with these jerkoffs...they have our future in their hands.

@caramel I plan on fighting and calling my congressmen along side of all of you, I just choose to think in real terms. Sure it would be great to fight these politicians punch to punch, but remember Big Tobacco has deep pockets and cigarette tax revenue provides entitlement program platforms that these left wing radicals run for office on.

I am one of you!
 

kaahn

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 26, 2015
808
1,048
Eastern NC
I support no regulation...not any at all. Like I said in another thread...regulations stiffle economic growth and innovation not to mention individual freedoms. With every new regulation comes more Government expansion which opens the door for politicians to dig deeper into my pocket and yours. Govt. is a business too so lets take from private business and private citizens and give it to the CEO's of the United States Government all in the name of "public safety". Hogwash! What we all need is a little less govt. intrusion. I hate that people buy into the notion that the govt. is here to " protect us from ourselves" or we need this new regulation for the greater good of society. If you fight for no regulations they may get some but not the sweeping legislation that they are clamoring for. Push back against any regulation. With every new regulation it wipes out one of yours, your families and future generations freedoms.
 

caramel

Vaping Master
Dec 23, 2014
3,492
10,735
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread