You're about the 100th person to propose that, and probably about the 10th person to try to make it happen.
If you can get them to come together for the common good, you'll be a hero.
Good luck with that!
The first thing you want them to do is create a trade association.
The second thing you want them to do is start to formulate some standards.
The third thing you want them to do is start working with the FDA to promulgate reasonable regulations.
I think they should be worrying about that stuff a lot more than worrying about Big Tobacco.
At least for right now anyway.
I agree but I think the two will naturally go hand in hand. When they work together as one for these same purposes you mention BT will see them as a unit and not individual small companies they can so easily push around.
If others have tried this then why hasn't it happened?
Why did the ECA disband?
The ECA was only for the manufacturers. I would like to see all parties involved be members of this partnership - manufacturers, vendors and end users - much more than your regular trade association. This to me is most fair when everyone has a say at the table.
Is there an unwillingness on the part of e-cig companies to form such a partnership?
I'd like to know the answers to these questions. ( not saying you know, just throwing this out there)
We do need some regulation to guarantee safety of the products hardware and e-liguids. We need to remain a free enterprise that the government doesn't tax or put silly restrictions on. Regulation for safety Yes, government involvement No.
That's the problem I have with seeing them work with the FDA. The FDA is known to twist things into being regulated and taxed by the government in the guise of safety regulations. If we can get the safety standards set and it's approved by the FDA without the extra government interference I would be all for it.
I really don't see any need for any regulations other than that of the safety issues.
What other FDA regulations other than safety issues could there be that I may be missing?
Not falling under 'regulation', we do need peer reviewed ( I hate those words) scientific studies on the health issues involved with using e-cigs and it's e-liquids.
Peer Reviewed in the sense that other scientists agree on the methods of testing and found conclusions of these studies. But it has to be done right! In many industries scientists are bought and paid for by Big Corporations and they twist the methodologies and data to make the outcome seem in the Big Corporations interest -
-This info wrongly touted as scientific facts, comes out in many "Peer Reviewed" journals that are "Respected" and yet there is no real objective science being done here - only smoke and mirrors. - This is what we need to make sure does Not happen to any studies done relating to the safety of e-cigs.