SKE Bar 15K, a prefilled pod kit that delivers the signature SKE Crystal taste you already love — now lasting up to 15,000 puffs. Designed for both performance and simplicity, this device combines cutting-edge functionality with the familiar, smooth mouth-to-lung (MTL) draw that SKE fans know and trust.

Powered by a rechargeable 850 mAh battery, the SKE Bar 15K ensures consistent output and long-lasting enjoyment. Its bright, clear display screen keeps you informed of both your battery and e-liquid levels at a glance, so you always know when it’s time to recharge or replace your pod. The transparent e-liquid tank adds a touch of practicality, letting you easily monitor your remaining juice.

With 16 original SKE flavours crafted using premium nicotine salts at 20 mg/ml, every puff bursts with authentic, satisfying taste. Whether you crave fruity blends or refreshing menthols, the SKE Bar 15K ensures every draw is rich, smooth, and true to SKE’s legacy of excellence.

Ready to experience the new SKE Bar 15K? Visit the vape sale uk store to learn more and choose your favourite flavour today.

Learn more about our latest releases:
vaporesso armour ultra kit
jnr 100k p4 stellarc

Get ready to elevate your vaping experience with the Lost Angel Mate 50K — and enjoy an irresistible promotion that’s too good to miss! From November 5 to November 12, we’re giving you more with every purchase. Buy one Lost Angel Mate 50K Disposable Vape (Starter Kit) and receive one Lost Angel Mate 50K Disposable Pod for free — or buy two pods and get one extra pod at no charge. There’s no limit to how many times you can redeem this offer — the more you grab, the more you gain!



During the event, the Lost Angel Mate 50K Disposable Pod will shine on our homepage with a special banner, plus EDM email updates to keep you informed. It’s the perfect time to expand your collection, enjoy longer sessions, and experience the flavor-packed, powerful performance that defines Lost Angel.

This exclusive offer won’t last long, so act fast and claim yours before it’s gone. Head over to Morevaping now to take advantage of this deal and explore a full range of cheap vapes trusted by vape enthusiasts around the world.

Quick links:
adjust myrusher 40k
lost angel sphere 35k

Does anyone know any coil builder in austin/ dripping springs Texas ?

Thanks to Eleaf for sending me this product to review!
Check it out on their website: iOre Mix


Disclaimer: This review is based entirely on my own experience and opinions. I’m not affiliated with Eleaf and I’m not being paid to write this.

Contents​

• In the Box
• Specs
• Design
• Pods
• Performance
• Pros
• Cons
• Verdict
• Photo Gallery
  

In the Box​

• 1 × IORE Mix Battery
• 2 × IORE Mix 1.0 Ω Pods
• 1 × IORE Mix Container
• 1 × User Manual
• 1 × Warranty Card
  

Specs​

• Size: 37 mm × 18.5 mm × 105 mm
• Battery Capacity: 1100 mAh
• Pod Capacity: 4 ml (2 ml + 2 ml)
• Coil Resistance: Mesh 1.0 Ω
• Output Wattage: 24 W Max
• Charging Current: 5 V / 1 A (USB-C)
  

Design​

The IORE Mix is a compact and lightweight pod system that immediately stands out with its unique dual-pod setup. It feels sturdy and comfortable in the hand, and although it is a little wider than a typical single-pod vape, it still stays pocket-friendly. The finish looks modern and clean, with smooth curves, clear branding, and a textured pattern on one side.

The overall build quality feels solid. The pods attach magnetically and click securely into place. The power button and indicator light are placed in the center, and the USB-C port is positioned for easy charging. The device feels well balanced and thoughtfully designed for daily use.

I like how practical this concept is. You can fill two pods with different flavors or the same one, and simply switch between them or use both together. It adds a lot of flexibility without complicating things.

Pods​

Each pod has a built-in 1.0 Ω mesh coil and holds 2 ml of liquid. The kit includes two pods that sit side by side inside the device, giving you a total of 4 ml when both are filled. One pod has a grey tint and the other a yellow tint, which makes it easy to tell them apart if you use two different flavors or nicotine strengths.

Refilling is done through a side silicone plug that seals tightly and keeps everything clean. The pods are transparent enough to easily see your liquid level, and I didn’t experience any leaking or condensation during use.

The draw feels smooth and consistent. Using one pod gives a tighter mouth-to-lung draw, while using both together produces a slightly more open restricted direct-lung draw with fuller vapor. The flavor is clear, balanced, and stays strong through multiple refills.

Overall, the pods perform very well and match the simplicity of the device perfectly.

Performance​

With its 1100 mAh internal battery and 24 W maximum output, the IORE Mix easily lasts a full day of moderate use. It charges through USB-C at 1 A, and a full charge takes around 40 minutes.

The device combines draw activation with a small button for mode switching. You can vape from the left pod, the right pod, both together, or alternate between them. Switching modes works quickly and adds a fun extra layer of control.

The vapor output is consistent and the flavor remains stable throughout the battery life. Airflow is fixed but feels well tuned, working nicely for both MTL and RDL styles. There are no power drops or random misfires, and the performance feels reliable and steady over time.

Pros​

• Two pods in one device for quick flavor switching
• Excellent flavor from the 1.0 Ω mesh coils
• Good build quality and modern design
• Easy refilling with no leaking
• Solid battery life and fast USB-C charging
• Four vaping modes that work smoothly
  

Cons​

• Airflow is not adjustable
• Slightly wider than single-pod kits
• Mixing very different flavors in dual mode can taste odd
  

Verdict​

The Eleaf IORE Mix is a creative and well-designed pod kit that feels refreshing in how it approaches convenience and versatility. The dual-pod setup makes it easy to switch between flavors or keep extra liquid ready to go, and the flavor quality from the 1.0 Ω mesh coils is excellent.

It suits both MTL and RDL vapers, and the battery life is impressive for its size. The build quality feels dependable, and the user experience is simple and satisfying.

If you want something that stands out from the usual single-pod systems and adds a practical twist without overcomplicating things, the IORE Mix is definitely worth trying.

Another big thanks to Eleaf for sending me this to review. I really enjoyed testing it and I’m excited to see what they’ll release next.

Photo Gallery​

These tests below only note my personal opinion for the ESTIMATED ratings for the batteries I tested at the time I tested them. Any battery that is not a genuine Samsung, Sony, Murata, LG, Panasonic, Molicel, EVE, Ampace, Reliance, Sinowatt, Lishen, BAK, or Sanyo can change at any time! This can be one of the hazards of using “rewrapped” batteries or ones from other manufacturers so carefully research any battery you are considering using before purchasing.

Misusing or mishandling lithium-ion batteries can pose a SERIOUS RISK of property damage, personal injury, or even death. Never use them outside of a fully protected battery pack and you use them at your own risk. Never exceed the battery’s true continuous discharge rating (CDR), never let it get colder than 0°C or hotter than 60°C to help lower the risks and extend cell life, and keep the plastic wrap and top insulating ring in perfect condition. Never use a battery that is physically damaged in any way.

Testing batteries at their limits is dangerous and should never be attempted by anyone who has not thoroughly studied the dangers involved, understands the risks, has the proper equipment, and takes all appropriate safety precautions.

If the battery has only one current rating number, or if it only says "max", then I have to assume the battery is rated at that current level for any type of discharge, including continuous.





Test Results
I tested this cell several months ago for my Patreon supporters but forgot to post a full test report publicly, my apologies. I haven’t tested by other 14500’s in years so I don’t have any direct comparisons with other cells.

Some info:

• The F15 beat the red-wrapped and gold-wrapped F12’s at 3A in Vapcell’s testing (https://www.vapcelltech.com/h-pd-251.html and https://www.vapcelltech.com/h-pd-183.html).
• The two cells I tested exceeded their 1500mAh capacity rating and their 3A current rating seems reasonable, not causing any excessive voltage sag or overheating.
• The minimum capacity spec is 1150mAh though, indicating a potential large inconsistency between cells. This is typical for all of the small cells though since none of them are made by the big manufacturers.
• The F15 has a 0.5A standard charge rating and 1A max. I recommend staying at or below 0.5A for decent cell life.

Continuous Current Discharge Graphs



Ratings and Performance Specs Graphic



18650/21700 Ratings & E-Scores and Recommended Batteries Tables:
The links are in my public Patreon pinned post: https://www.patreon.com/posts/pinned-post-137974946

I want to work for the community full time! If you feel what I do is worth a couple dollars a month and you would like early access to battery availability, battery testing and news, and a say in what I test, then please consider becoming a patron and supporting my testing efforts: Get more from Battery Mooch on Patreon.

Key Features:

• Material: Solid brass body with black ring design
• Battery Compatibility: 18650 / 20700 / 21700 (interchangeable)
• Thread Type: Standard 510
• Dimensions: 28mm × 70mm
• Weight: 110g – perfectly balanced in hand

This mod delivers a clean, direct connection for a true mechanical feel — no chips, no fuss, just raw power. Whether you’re chasing clouds or flavor, it hits consistently and feels premium with its solid brass build.

If you’re into authentic mechanical performance and minimal aesthetics, this one’s definitely worth a look.

You can check it out here: https://www.minecig.com/bestia-mods...ss-1-x-18650-20700-21700-black-ring-7706.html

You’ve seen them everywhere. Disposable vapes with puff counts that seem to climb higher every month. First, it was 3,000. Then 6,000 shot past 8,000. Now, we're seeing staggering numbers like 15,000 puffs on a single device.


It begs the question that’s on every vaper’s mind: Can you really get 15,000 puffs from one disposable?


The short answer is: It’s complicated. The long answer is what will make you a smarter consumer. Let's break down the marketing magic and the real-world factors behind these impressive numbers.

The "Lab Count" vs. The "Real-World Count"​

Think of a vape's puff count like a car's "miles per gallon" (MPG) rating. The number on the sticker is achieved under perfect, laboratory-controlled conditions—steady speeds, no hills, no traffic, and a very light foot on the gas.


It's the same with vapes.


When a manufacturer tests a device for its maximum puff count, they use a machine that takes perfectly consistent, short puffs. We’re talking about one-second-long drags, with precise intervals in between to allow the coil to cool.


But who vapes like that? In the real world, your puff count is determined by a handful of crucial factors that the lab machines don't account for.

4 Factors That Actually Determine Your Puff Count​

1. Your Puff Duration​

This is the single biggest factor. Are you a short, quick puffer, or do you enjoy long, deep-three-to-four-second drags? A four-second puff uses four times the e-liquid and battery power as the one-second "lab puff." Your 15,000-puff device could easily become a 4,000-puff device if you take consistently long hits.

2. Vaping Style (DTL vs. MTL)​

• MTL (Mouth-to-Lung): This style is similar to smoking a cigarette. You draw the vapor into your mouth first, then inhale. It uses less power and produces less vapor, resulting in a higher number of puffs from the same amount of e-liquid.
• DTL (Direct-to-Lung): This is for cloud chasers. You inhale the vapor directly into your lungs, which requires a more powerful device, a lower-resistance coil, and produces massive clouds. It’s a fantastic experience, but it burns through e-liquid and battery much faster.

3. E-Liquid Capacity and Battery Life​

A massive puff count is impossible without two things: a huge e-liquid reservoir and a rechargeable battery. A device can’t physically hold enough liquid for 15,000 long puffs without being the size of a brick, and no disposable battery can last that long on a single charge. This is why all modern high-puff-count devices are rechargeable.

4. The Device Itself​

The device's internal power settings and coil resistance play a huge role. High-performance devices designed for big flavor and clouds will naturally use more liquid per puff.

Case Study: The Magic Bar Ultimate 15000 Puffs DTL Disposable Vape​

Let's look at a real-world example, like the Magic Bar Ultimate 15000 Puffs DTL Disposable Vape. The name itself gives us two huge clues: "15,000 Puffs" and "DTL."






This device is specifically engineered for a Direct-to-Lung experience. That means it's built to deliver rich flavor and satisfying, dense clouds. Because it's a DTL device, each puff is inherently more substantial and will use more e-liquid than a standard MTL device. The product page notes it has a 0.5ohm mesh coil, which is designed for generating large amounts of vapor.


So, will you, as a DTL vaper taking satisfying three-second pulls, get exactly 15,000 puffs? Almost certainly not.


But that doesn't mean the number is useless.

The Verdict: Is It a Lie or Just Marketing?​

It's not so much a lie as it is a standardized metric. The 15,000-puff number is the device's absolute maximum potential under ideal, machine-tested conditions. It serves as a benchmark to compare it to a 5,000 or 8,000-puff device.


You can be confident that the Magic Bar Ultimate 15000, with its large 22ml e-liquid capacity, will last you significantly longer than a lower-count device. A heavy DTL user might get 5,000-7,000 very satisfying, high-quality puffs, while a more moderate user might get closer to 10,000. For a device this powerful, that is an incredible amount of value and longevity.


The key is to see the puff count as a measure of volume and potential, not a guaranteed promise.


Next time you shop for a disposable vape, look beyond the big number on the box.

• Check the style: Is it DTL or MTL? Choose what fits your preference.
• Confirm it’s rechargeable: A high puff count is meaningless without it. The Magic Bar Ultimate comes with a 650mAh rechargeable battery to ensure you can use all the e-liquid.
• Manage your expectations: Use the puff count as a guide to its overall lifespan, knowing your personal habits will determine the final count.

Happy vaping, and may your puffs be plentiful—however many you end up getting!You’ve seen them everywhere. Disposable vapes with puff counts that seem to climb higher every month. First, it was 3,000. Then 6,000 shot past 8,000. Now, we're seeing staggering numbers like 15,000 puffs on a single device.
It begs the question that’s on every vaper’s mind: Can you really get 15,000 puffs from one disposable?
The short answer is: It’s complicated. The long answer is what will make you a smarter consumer. Let's break down the marketing magic and the real-world factors behind these impressive numbers.

The "Lab Count" vs. The "Real-World Count"​

Think of a vape's puff count like a car's "miles per gallon" (MPG) rating. The number on the sticker is achieved under perfect, laboratory-controlled conditions—steady speeds, no hills, no traffic, and a very light foot on the gas.
It's the same with vapes.
When a manufacturer tests a device for its maximum puff count, they use a machine that takes perfectly consistent, short puffs. We’re talking about one-second-long drags, with precise intervals in between to allow the coil to cool.
But who vapes like that? In the real world, your puff count is determined by a handful of crucial factors that the lab machines don't account for.

4 Factors That Actually Determine Your Puff Count​

1. Your Puff Duration​

This is the single biggest factor. Are you a short, quick puffer, or do you enjoy long, deep-three-to-four-second drags? A four-second puff uses four times the e-liquid and battery power as the one-second "lab puff." Your 15,000-puff device could easily become a 4,000-puff device if you take consistently long hits.

2. Vaping Style (DTL vs. MTL)​

• MTL (Mouth-to-Lung): This style is similar to smoking a cigarette. You draw the vapor into your mouth first, then inhale. It uses less power and produces less vapor, resulting in a higher number of puffs from the same amount of e-liquid.
• DTL (Direct-to-Lung): This is for cloud chasers. You inhale the vapor directly into your lungs, which requires a more powerful device, a lower-resistance coil, and produces massive clouds. It’s a fantastic experience, but it burns through e-liquid and battery much faster.

3. E-Liquid Capacity and Battery Life​

A massive puff count is impossible without two things: a huge e-liquid reservoir and a rechargeable battery. A device can’t physically hold enough liquid for 15,000 long puffs without being the size of a brick, and no disposable battery can last that long on a single charge. This is why all modern high-puff-count devices are rechargeable.

4. The Device Itself​

The device's internal power settings and coil resistance play a huge role. High-performance devices designed for big flavor and clouds will naturally use more liquid per puff.

Case Study: The Magic Bar Ultimate 15000 Puffs DTL Disposable Vape​

Let's look at a real-world example, like the Magic Bar Ultimate 15000 Puffs DTL Disposable Vape. The name itself gives us two huge clues: "15,000 Puffs" and "DTL."

This device is specifically engineered for a Direct-to-Lung experience. That means it's built to deliver rich flavor and satisfying, dense clouds. Because it's a DTL device, each puff is inherently more substantial and will use more e-liquid than a standard MTL device. The product page notes it has a 0.5ohm mesh coil, which is designed for generating large amounts of vapor.
So, will you, as a DTL vaper taking satisfying three-second pulls, get exactly 15,000 puffs? Almost certainly not.
But that doesn't mean the number is useless.

The Verdict: Is It a Lie or Just Marketing?​

It's not so much a lie as it is a standardized metric. The 15,000-puff number is the device's absolute maximum potential under ideal, machine-tested conditions. It serves as a benchmark to compare it to a 5,000 or 8,000-puff device.
You can be confident that the Magic Bar Ultimate 15000, with its large 22ml e-liquid capacity, will last you significantly longer than a lower-count device. A heavy DTL user might get 5,000-7,000 very satisfying, high-quality puffs, while a more moderate user might get closer to 10,000. For a device this powerful, that is an incredible amount of value and longevity.
The key is to see the puff count as a measure of volume and potential, not a guaranteed promise.
Next time you shop for a disposable vape, look beyond the big number on the box.

• Check the style: Is it DTL or MTL? Choose what fits your preference.
• Confirm it’s rechargeable: A high puff count is meaningless without it. The Magic Bar Ultimate comes with a 650mAh rechargeable battery to ensure you can use all the e-liquid.
• Manage your expectations: Use the puff count as a guide to its overall lifespan, knowing your personal habits will determine the final count.

Happy vaping, and may your puffs be plentiful—however many you end up getting!

Hi, today we're taking a look at the Dead Rabbit 4 PRO RTA, sent to me by Hellvape. In this review, I'll examine each of the features that distinguish this vaporizer. I hope that by the end of this review, you've understood this product and can decide whether or not to invest in it. As always, my opinions are free and based on my personal experience.

► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 PRO RTA; Before we begin, let's take a look at some of the special features listed by the manufacturer:
1. Honeycomb deck with 48 holes for centralized airflow
2. Spacious deck for effortless building
3. 100% leak-proof top-to-bottom airflow system
4. Quick and convenient slide-top e-juice filling
5. Elegant and durable chamber lid with metal grille



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 PRO RTA; Packaging:
The DR4 PRO package states on the front; The Hellvape logo, the identifying wording "PRO DEAD RABBIT 4," a sticker indicating the color of this vaporizer, and a product image. The back features the specifications, parameters, packing list, logos, and trademarks. The remaining parts of the packaging include the product name (Dead Rabbit 4), the slogan "Evolve your vaping genius," a scratch & check, a sticker with the batch number, and the color of this sample.





► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 PRO RTA; Packing List:
• 1* Dead Rabbit 4 RTA
• 1* Bubble Glass
• 2* 0.37Ω Ni80 Clapton Coils
• 1* Accessory Bag
• 2* Cotton Ties
• 1* Coil Trimming Tool
• 1* User Manual



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 PRO RTA; Specifications & Available Colors:
• Dimensions: 26x49.5mm
• Net Weight: 59g
• Capacity: 3.5ml, 5.5ml, 2ml (TPD)
• Replaceable 810 Drip Tip
• Dual Coils Postless Deck with 48 Airholes
• Adjustable Top Airflow
• Slide-Open Fill
• SS
• GUNMETAL
• MATTE BLACK
• BLACK GOLD



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 PRO RTA; Introduction:
After reviewing the Dead Rabbit 4, Hellvape sent me the PRO version, which differs substantially in that it has the added armor protecting the 3.5ml straight glass. Therefore, this will be a brief description of the product. More detailed information can be found here: Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 Rta Review By Frenkyou
Thank you and happy reading.



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 PRO RTA; Exploded view:
The tank is completely removable for thorough cleaning. The threads and joints are, as usual, well-made, and handling this tank reveals a high-quality structural sturdiness, in keeping with Hellvape's best traditions.



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 PRO RTA; How it's made:
After some graphic changes, the Dead Rabbit logo returns to proudly display on the central one-piece structure. Elegant decorations are found on both the AFC ring and the base of the deck. The base, on the bottom, features a slightly protruding adjustable 510 pin and the additional PRO logo.



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 PRO RTA; Refill:
The attention to detail is particularly noticeable when dismantling and separating the top cap from the underlying one-piece intermediate structure. To perfectly seal the sliding area of the refill, the top cap uses a large O-ring and a white silicone gasket. Both of these elements are replaceable and are supplied as spare parts in the spare parts package. The sliding top cap is marked with an arrow; the slide is well-padded to prevent accidental opening, and the refill slot is correctly sized for most e-liquid bottle tips. The Dead Rabbit 4 RTA with the straight tank can hold up to 3.5ml of e-liquid, while the glass bubble tank can hold up to 5.5ml.

The Geek Bar Pulse 15000 Thermal Edition is here to redefine your disposable vape experience. Combining heat-reactive aesthetics with the trusted Geek Bar performance, this edition delivers not only visual flair but also intense flavor and cloud satisfaction. With its signature dual-mode system — Pulse Mode (15,000 puffs) and Regular Mode (up to 7,500 puffs) — you can easily switch between powerful hits and extended sessions.

Equipped with a dual mesh coil, the Geek Bar Pulse 15000 Thermal Edition ensures consistent vapor output and rich, smooth taste with every draw. The innovative full-screen display keeps you informed of your battery and e-juice levels, while the 650mAh rechargeable battery guarantees long-lasting use.

Whether you’re chasing clouds or savoring flavors, this stylish and smart device has it all. Discover the balance of power, performance, and aesthetics with the Geek Bar Pulse 15000 Thermal Edition — available now at your favorite vape online shop.

Other kits you may prefer:
Geek Bar Pulse X 25K Thermal Edition Disposable Vape
One Tank 40K Disposable Vape

Buy Now: Voom Cobble Disposable (20000 Puffs)

With up to 20,000 puffs in a stylish, user-friendly gadget, the VOOM Cobble Disposable offers prolonged vaping. It is built for dependability and simplicity, with a rechargeable battery that can be charged via USB-C and comes pre-filled with rich e-liquid. You'll love the sophisticated mesh coil technology for steady, smooth hits and rich taste profiles—from watermelon ice to fizzy cherry—whether you're a cloud enthusiast or a flavor chaser. The Cobble eliminates the inconvenience of refilling or rebuilding and is both portable and durable, making it perfect for use when on the road. Unpack and vape, that's all. Note: Contains the chemical nicotine, which is addictive.

Specifications:

• Battery Capacity 650 mAh
• Puff Counts Up to 20000 PUFFS
• Charging Port TYPE-C
• Nicotine Strength：50mg/ml
• Mesh Coil
• LCD Screen

Our Brands

• Adjust
• Digiflavor
• FUME
• Geekvape
• Geekbar
• IGET
• Kangertech
• NEXA
• Fifty Bar and more.

IREX Astral 80K marks a new chapter in advanced vaping design, blending cutting-edge features with a sleek, functional build. Created for users who expect more from every puff, it offers a remarkable 48ml vape juice capacity and a 5% nicotine strength that delivers a smooth, consistent draw. Its draw-activated firing system ensures effortless operation, while the 360-degree full digital display provides clear visibility of battery life, e-liquid level, and mode indicators for a refined, intuitive experience.



When exploring disposable vapes online, the IREX Astral 80K easily stands out. With approximately 80000 puffs in Normal Mode and 70000 puffs in Plus+ Mode, it combines endurance with versatility. The integrated 1000mAh rechargeable battery keeps you powered longer, and the adjustable ice and nicotine levels let you personalize every inhale to your preference. Its dual-mode system adds flexibility — offering either smooth consistency or enhanced performance — all within a device built for reliability and visual appeal.

If you seek a high-capacity disposable that balances sophistication, innovation, and power, the IREX Astral 80K is an ideal choice. Experience it and explore a full collection of premium devices when you buy vapes online at Morevaping — your trusted destination for authentic products, competitive pricing, and a seamless shopping experience designed for modern vapers.

Quick links:
lala bar vibe
fasta burrst v2 37000

VOOPOO Argus P3 Kit, a compact and luxurious pod system designed for vapers who appreciate both aesthetics and functionality. With its soft leather finish combined with bold metallic accents, the Argus P3 doesn’t just feel premium—it looks it too. Multiple color options allow you to match the device to your personal style, making it a perfect accessory as well as a vape.

The Argus P3 introduces VOOPOO’s first full-touch mini box design. Its 2.01-inch TFT touchscreen makes navigation intuitive and fun, offering DIY settings, Party, ECO, and SOS modes, and even a child lock for added safety. Over 18 creative watch face designs keep the interface fresh and customizable, with four pre-installed and more to unlock. A side dial button lets you adjust airflow steplessly and control power settings with just one hand.

Powered by a built-in 1500mAh battery and capable of 30W max output, the Argus P3 delivers long-lasting vaping sessions. Quick Type-C charging ensures you’re back to full power in no time.

The kit comes with the Argus Snap Pod Cartridge, featuring a detachable cap, 2ml capacity, top-filling design, and VOOPOO’s iCosm code 2.0 technology for consistent, rich flavor and upgraded leak resistance. The pod is compatible with other Argus Top Fill cartridges, giving flexibility for different e-liquids and preferences.

For more information on the VOOPOO Argus P3 Kit, visit the vape shop uk and explore all the specs and color options.

You may also be interested in:
voopoo x3 kit
vozol vista 40000

Dinner Lady Galax 60K is a remarkable advancement in disposable vape technology, offering a seamless balance between power, convenience, and style. Designed for discerning vapers, it features a refined and comfortable build that enhances both grip and aesthetics. With a 5% nicotine strength and 26ml pre-filled e-liquid, it provides a smooth and satisfying vaping experience that lasts far longer than the average device.



Delivering up to 60000 puffs, this model redefines longevity. It’s powered by a robust 1000mAh rechargeable battery and equipped with a 0.8-ohm mesh coil, ensuring dense vapor and pure flavor every time. The innovative Power Dial rotary gear (10W–30W) allows you to fine-tune your vaping output, while the animated starlit display screen gives you clear insights into battery life and e-juice levels. With Type-C fast charging, you’re always ready to vape when you need it most.

Experience why the Dinner Lady Galax 60K stands out among high-end disposables—reliable, stylish, and built for performance. Find it now at Morevaping, the best online vape store for authentic products, competitive prices, and a smooth shopping experience you can trust.

You might also like:
arymi hookalit
olit 150k

Maxfel Ultra Pro Prefilled Pod (1pc/pack)
RRP: £5.99
Deal price: £4.49
Discount code: MUPP
Begins: 2025/11/3
Ends: 2026/2/28

RandM Fumot T32000 Ultra Prefilled Pod Kit
RRP: £12.99
Deal price: £9.59
Discount code: FT32
Begins: 2025/11/3
Ends: 2026/2/28

Vaporesso LUXE XR Max 2 Empty Pod Cartridge
RRP: £3.99
Deal price: £2.49
Discount code: XRMP
Begins: 2025/11/3
Ends: 2026/2/28

Hi! I'm a new member! Saying hello to everyone.

Joyetech eRoll Nano Review: Compact Vape Pen with Portable Charging Case​

Thanks to Joyetech for sending me this product to review!
Check it out on their website: Joyetech eRoll Nano

Disclaimer: This review is my own thoughts and I am not associated with anyone at Joyetech, nor am I being paid to write this review.

What’s in the Box?​

1 x eRoll Nano PCC (Portable Charging Case)
1 x eRoll Nano Battery (vape pen)
1 x eRoll Nano Pod
1 x Warranty Card
1 x User Manual

Specifications​

PCC (Charging Case):
Size: 83.6 × 27.2 × 19.5mm
Battery Capacity: 800mAh
Charging: USB-C 5V/1A

Vape Pen:
Size: 17.5 × 96.1mm
Cartridge Capacity: 2ml
Battery Capacity: 310mAh
Resistance: 1.0Ω
Output Wattage: Max 13W
Filling Hole: 3.3 × 4.5mm
Charging: USB-C 5V/0.7A

Design and Build Quality​

The eRoll Nano is tiny, lightweight, and discreet, almost cigarette-like. The aluminum body feels solid and premium despite its small size. The included Portable Charging Case (PCC) is compact, protects the device, and recharges the pen multiple times on the go. That makes it super practical if you want a backup vape or a portable option for the day.

Pods – Filling and Ease of Use​

The single 2ml pod uses a 1.0Ω coil for smooth MTL vaping. Filling is easy thanks to the 3.3 × 4.5mm port, and the transparent pod makes it simple to check the e-liquid level. Flavor is clean and consistent, focusing on nicotine salts or higher-strength e-liquids rather than huge clouds. It’s simple, straightforward, and works well for a discreet MTL experience.

Performance – Battery Life and Vaping Experience​

The 310mAh battery in the pen alone is small, so it won’t last a full day on its own. That’s where the PCC comes in, it keeps the vape charged all day without needing a wall outlet. The device has a max output of 13W, which gives a satisfying MTL draw similar to a cigarette. USB-C charging on both the pen and case is fast and convenient, making downtime minimal.

Pros​

• Ultra-compact and discreet design
• Comes with a Portable Charging Case
• Smooth MTL draw, cigarette-like feel
• Easy refill pods with 2ml capacity
• Clean, consistent flavor with 1.0Ω coil
• USB-C fast charging
  

Cons​

• Max 13W, not suitable for DL vapers
• Small pen battery, fully reliant on PCC for all-day use
• No adjustable airflow or wattage
  

Verdict: Is the Joyetech eRoll Nano Worth It?​

The Joyetech eRoll Nano is a stylish and highly portable pod kit, perfect for anyone looking for a discreet, cigarette-like vape. The Portable Charging Case is a huge advantage because it allows you to recharge the pen multiple times throughout the day.

If you are switching from smoking or just want a convenient backup device, the eRoll Nano delivers simplicity, flavor, and portability all in one.



Another big thanks to Joyetech for sending me this device to review. I really enjoyed testing it, and I hope you like this new style of review!

Hi. A ~week ago, I received the Taifun GX Style by ShenRay. I'd like to thank the Minecig.com store for sending me this product. It's a review sample, so I should review it after receiving and testing the atomizer. So here it is.

Let's start by saying that this is my first time using the Taifun GX. I've used other Smokerstore products (both clones and originals), and I expected it to be good, even very good, and I was right.

The atomizer is 23mm in diameter, 41mm tall without the drip tip, and has a capacity of approximately 4ml. The installed air inserts are 3x1.8mm. The kit includes an additional 510 drip tip, four spare deck screws, spare O-rings, two Allen keys (for the deck and the 510 pin), and, of course, the atomizer. It's possible that the retail version will include more, it would be nice to see a spare glass tube.



The build quality is good, though there are some machining marks visible inside, which is perfectly acceptable considering the price. I didn't feel like anything was about to fall apart during use. There aren't many threads, but in my case, none of them made any unwanted noises, which is a big surprise with a styled atomizer. The O-rings are also of good quality, which isn't standard in clones. Everything that moves operates smoothly, and nothing gets stuck. The draft is pleasant, though slightly whistling, but not overly loud or irritating. The ring adjustment is sufficient, but for more demanding users, you can buy air inserts to further customize the draft. The thing I might complain about, though I don't know how it is on the original, is the position of the airflow ring in its final position. It seems to me that it should stop sooner, but this doesn't cause any problems in use.



This ring also functions as liquid filling, simply turn it to the appropriate position, and a filling port will appear. I mainly use small 10ml bottles with a thin spout, but I had no problem filling it from a 60ml Gorilla. With larger bottles, it can be a bit tricky.



The second thing that's not ideal is the liquid transfer wires. They tend to fall apart without the O-rings (this isn't ShenRay's fault, as the original also has these wires). Once the O-rings are installed, you can't remove the wires because you can't reinstall them without unscrewing the tank, which makes cleaning difficult. You have to unscrew the 510 pin with an Allen key and then unscrew the tank to rinse it. Other atomizers I've seen with the steel wire design didn't have these O-rings because they were made differently. I don't know the purpose of this, as I unfortunately have nothing to compare them to. Perhaps this improves liquid transfer. This isn't particularly annoying to me because I usually clean my atomizers at home and have an Allen key to unscrew the tank, but I think it's worth mentioning. If this were to really bother anyone, I think it wouldn't be a problem to swap out these wires for other wires or a mesh.



Installing the coil was easy, as was installing the cotton. Although I haven't had much experience with atomizers with wires for liquid transport, I managed to do it on my first try and didn't experience any leaks or problems with transport. The cotton is always properly moistened, and I've never had a dry hit. On one side of the deck, there's a small screw inside. From what I understand, it's used to increase the liquid flow by venting the tank, but I didn't feel the need to use it (I tested it with 50/50 and 70/30 liquids, and the liquid flow was very good without unscrewing it).



I mainly tested Fused Claptons and Aliens 2x26/38, 3x28/38, and 4x28/38. I also tried Ni80 26GA round wire. I was happy with all the builds. I tried all the 3mm coils because I thought they would fit well, and I stuck with it because I was completely satisfied with the performance of the 3mm coil. Unfortunately, I forgot to take photos of each build, it completely slipped my mind, but I think everyone knows what a coil looks like if I provided the specs. I'll just post the 4x28/38 @3mm coil I'm currently using, which work great.



Since I received it, I've been using it every day and it's truly great. The flavor is top-notch, the vapor is pleasant and wet (moist, wet, saturated? I don't know how to properly describe it in English, but you get the idea). I've used various liquids, mainly fruit and tobacco, and I'm pleasantly surprised because I've sometimes noticed more flavor notes in a given liquid than on the GTIV. Needless to say, it's simply very good. I also like the size of the atomizer, because it fits on my Volish Vix, which together creates a nice compact set.




In summary, I really like the atomizer and think I'll be using it often because it's really cool and pleasant. The flavor is very good, and the vapor volume is sufficient and dense. It takes me less than 5 minutes to prepare it for use. There are no flaws that would prevent me from using it. As for the design, I think it's nice, but everyone has their own taste. I think it is worth buying and I will consider purchasing the original in the future. If you can afford the original, I recommend supporting SmokerStore, because they make great equipment.

This is my first review, so it may not be perfect. English isn't my primary language, so I apologize in advance for any errors. If anyone has any advice, I'd be happy to read it. You can also ask questions if I've missed anything, and I'll do my best to answer them.

Basically title, im just looking for a rig legacy or kennedy 28, preferably brass

Does anyone know which ejuice vape similar to the geekbar maxican mango either in salt Nic or freebase ?

Alright, another FIRST here people. Despite having used TPA flavors since the beginning, I am finally reviewing and single flavor testing some of them. With the exception of maybe their Vanilla Custard II, and just a few others, I could not remember the last time TPA released new flavors, so let's get INTO them !!!!!



> As always (or most times), all flavors tested at the listed weights, and in a 70v/30p/3mg carrier base. All steeped at least 1.5 weeks, and tested on the beloved SteamCrave RDTA v.1, running dual 24ga. Kanthal vertical coils, and with Koh Gen Do cotton. Fresh, or dry burned coils and fresh cotton before every test. Tested at 65 watts.








**Berry Chewy Squares (TPA) 4.5% (10-24-25)** -- The moment I started to test this one, I immediately (and throughout the entire test) got a very distinct two profiles. A pink starburst, mashed up with a gummy bear. At first it seemed as if the starburst was the dominant profile with an "off-note", but, I deciphered it as a gummy bear. Now when I say a pink starburst, that was just an approximation, and it wasn't exactly that, but in the ball park. At first I wasn't sure if the two profiles worked together, but as the test proceeded, I felt they did. It was very hard to nail down an exact berry with this one, but it seemed based off of a strawberry, tempered with maybe some pineapple, and some light coconut.

It had a somewhat "creamy" aspect to it, but it wasn't full on creamy. At 4.5% it was very full, with maybe an 8.75/10 on the strength scale. Sweetness was a few ficks above mid-level, which was fine for a candy flavor. No off-notes once I decided the other profile was "gummy"-ish. I could see a lot of uses for this in (duh) candy mixes, and because the exact "berry/berries" were fairly non-descript, it would be VERY easy to push/pull in any direction you wanted. IMHO this one was a mashup of a pink starburst with a gummy bear with a light/er creamy-ish undertone. Leaving this one very high at a **9.3/10**.

**Berry Jam (TPA) 4.5% (10-24-25)** -- Jammy McJam Jam !!!!! Oh yes, I LOVE a good Jam flavor, and this is now ONE of them. This one immediately reminded me of [Flavor Labs Strawberry Jam](https://forum...................../t/flavor-labs-single-flavor-tests-testing-now/249286/19?u=sessiondrummer). Now not because they were identical, but both had VERY good, and similar Jammy qualities. After polishing off TWO testers of this one, I realized I hadn't written a word !!!! Yeah, it's that good. The "berry" seemed based in a deliciously ripe and juicy strawberry, BUT, it had something, darker tempered into the mix. I'm going to say a Raspberry, but it was VERY hard to tell, as TPA very craftly layered it in below the Strawberry in such a way that it bent the strawberry slightly darker which was a VERY interesting approach, and effect. VERY well done. The jammy-ness was almost the FIRST thing that hit me, and it was good. Almost like a true pectin laden actual jam. Very realistic, tasty, and, well, Jammy !!!!

At 4.5% it was very full and I'd have to rate it up at a 9/10 on the strength scale, and it might be able to be pushed up to 5.0%, but most will probably never need to. Sweetness was a few ticks above mid-level, which was perfect for a jammy flavor, and never cloyingly sweet. ZERO off-notes, complaints or issues. As I was finishing the third tester I was determined to at least come up with one "want", but I gave up. TPA did a great job with this one, and did so by taking a juicy, ripe, red strawberry jam, and temper it with something darker. Pretty tasty and unique. With all of THAT said, it's time to release the Kraken on this one, and hot drop it at a **10/10**. Get your jam on !!!

**Bubblegum (Pink) (TPA) 4.5% (10-24-25)** -- FIRST ONE on deck from the NEW TPA 2025 flavors release. I started this one out at 2.5% but it was clearly underpowered, so I upped it to 3.5%, then 4.5%, and it seemed to open up a bit, and I think this will be the finalized testing weight for these. Once I stabilized the mixing weight, this one proved to be very bubblegummy and indeed, with a great "pink" overtone. At 4.5% it was fairly strong, and at about a 6.5/10 on the strength scale. It was pretty accurate for a typical Hubba Bubba, or Bubble Yum type bubblegum. It never wandered into a Juicy Fruit or non-descript bubble gum but stayed perfectly "pink" throughout my tests.

At times I could almost pick out the dusting coating that you sometimes get on a fresh piece out of the wrapper. Pleasantly there were no off-notes, and nothing to distract from the bubble gum experience. As is/was/is sometimes the case, about my only complaint would be a bit more saturation, but even as it stood at 4.5% it was good, and more importantly, convincing. Sweetness was about 2-3 ticks above mid-level and that suited a bbgum flavor. With no complaints, or off-notes, and my only "want" being a tad more saturation, leaving this little pinky high at a **8.9/10**.

**Fuji Apple Flavor (TPA) 4.5% (10-24-25)** -- Crisp, tart, and juicy were my main take-aways on this one. A very convincing Fuji which tasted smack dab in between a red and green apple, almost like a rose apple LOL. It had some of the light almost honey-like undertones common in some Fujis. It did taste fairly tart, and it smelled even tart-er in the bottle. Sweetness was just at mid-level, and it was very strong at 4.5%. Not ceiling smashing, but possible 4.0% could be a better SFT, but was still good at this weight.

At times I got a slight, almost artificial sweetener like push on the finish, but it was very minor, and seemed to come and go. Beyond that, no real issues or complaints. A fresh, juicy, tarty Fuji, that was realistic with ever so slight honey like undertones. It felt good at a **9/10**.

**Gummy Fruity Gushy (TPA) 4.5% (10-24-25)** -- Well I wasn't sure what to make of this one at the start, and at the end, I was still there. It had a fairly decent gummy profile, but the fruity, gushy I wasn't so sure of. It did taste like a somewhat bland, neutral candy-ish flavor, mixed with some gummy-ness. The fruit/fruits never really took shape, and it was kind of a sweetened, gummy blur, as opposed to a more focused flavor. At 4.5% it was somewhat strong, and maybe a 6/10 on the strength scale, but still tasted somewhat muted.

Sweetness was just about mid-level, and I did not get any off-notes, but I did have some "wants". A somewhat more focused flavor, or better defined flavor would have improved it. It wasn't terrible, but I can't see it as a main driver in a mix, but maybe a candy baser/mixer at best. Leaving it somewhat lower at a **6/10**.

**Lemon Candy (TPA) 4.5% (10-24-25)** -- I went into this one FULLY expecting a LemonHead. Exciting times here people, as this was NOT a LemonHead at all !!!! Dramatics not withstanding, this one was actually really good. Trying to give an exact candy match was difficult, but it was closest to a Sweet Lemon Drop. Now you may not 100% know what that is, but it is a sweetened lemon candy, with SOME tartness, and a hint of sour, but focused more on a sweetened natual lemon candy. Whew, that was hard to explain.

At 4.5% it was good but not what I would call strong, and maybe a 6.75/10 on the strength scale. Tasting it was very interesting, as it was a fairly complex Lemon profile with some natural, more artificial, and some zest/citrus oil on the finish. Actually it was one of the more complex Lemons I've tested. As a whole it was def. centered more on a sweetened lemon rather than a sour/tart focused lemon. Clean, fresh, and finished with a nice Zest. No off-notes or complaints, but my big "want" would have been a more saturated flavor. It might be able to be pushed a little higher, but unsure. Because of the very nice complex lemon profile, I decided to leave it high even though, it wasn't the strongest flavor. Finalized it at a **9.2/10**.

**Lemon Slice (TPA) 4.5% (10-25-25)** -- Having JUST tested TPA's Lemon Candy, this one was rather confusing, as it shared some of the same profiles/nuances to the aforementioned. What is was missing from the Lemon Candy, was, well, the "candy". Beyond that, it was an interesting lemon profile, riding on a sweet carrier. Now the MOST interesting thing about this one, was that it never presented as a lemonade. Logic dictates it would have, Lemon, Sweetener, is Lemonade, right ?? No. The lemon while good, was nowhere near as complex to the Lemon Candy, and not as strong in the overall mix. This one was more 50% Lemon, 50% sweetener for comparison. At 4.5%, it was not one of the stronger flavors, and I would rate it at a 6/10 on the strength scale.

Sweetness was a few ticks above mid level, but it never seemed cloyingly sweet, which again, was interesting. I struggled to think where you would use this flavor, and with it's lighter stature, how it would play in mixes. It would be GREAT as a sweetener, with a touch of lemon for sure. For a solo test, it was actually interesting to test, and strangly satisfying, and I'm not sure why LOL. When I think of a Lemon Wedge, I think of an actual wedge (slicded), of Lemon, which this was not. This made scoring this strange little interesting one difficult. As an interestingly different "lemon" flavor I'd rate it high, but I will score it at it's name, and push it down to a **5.5/10**. Even with that said, this one would make a unique addition to your collection, and again, was a strangely surprisingly good solo flavor.

**Mango (Sweet) (TPA) 4.5% (10-25-25)** -- Bright, punchy, orange, AND yellow were my big take-aways on this one. This one started out with a bang, but had some baggage. The initial onrush was that of a juicy ripe mango, but midway through however it almost tasted like and under ripe mango mashed in. There was a very persistent off-note on the finish, and it was hard to quantify, but the flavor finished somewhat dry. This was odd because it started off very well. It was almost if it was a ripe and unripe mango in the same flavor. It tasted mostly artificial but with natural accents.

At 4.5% it was as strong as you would want, and sweetness was just at mid level. Beyond the mish-mosh of ripe and unripe, the only off-note was on the finish, and it MIGHT be able to be covered up in a mix. The best I can come up with would be a somewhat astringent dryness. Not terrible, not great, and probably better as a baser/mixer. Because the scope of these reviews are single flavored, I didn't want to slow the roll by attempting to conceal the finishing off-note, so rating it as tested at a **6.9/10**.

**Orange (Tangy) (TPA) 4.5% (10-25-25)** -- With this one, I had been expecting a natural orange, maybe with some "Tang" or tangy notes. Instead, this one proved to be more an orange creamsicle flavor. The orange was fairly artificial with some natural notes, with maybe a light tangerine lower in the mix. That was the main profile, but beneath it was an almost creamy carrier that it rode on top of. It never fully took on an orange creamsicle but that was my close approximation.

At 4.5% it was about a 7.5/10 on the strength scale, and sweetness was about 1 tick above mid level, and that seemed to suit the flavor. Because of the creamy carrier/undertones, the orange didn't have much bite, but there was a little crisp tartness on the finish. All in, this one was much more of a start to a pretty good orange creamsicle, or simply a orange cream. I would place the orange to cream percentages to about 55% orange, 45% creameries. No real off notes, but a big want would be more citrusy punch or bite from the orange. As it stood, not terrible, but it's "orange" uses will be limited. Leaving it modestly at a **6.5/10**.

**Peach Gummy Candy (TPA) 4.5% (10-26-25)** -- Gummy, gummy, kinda gummy was the name of the game for this one. The gummy profile seemed to stay as an undertone from beginning to the middle, and was most dominant on the finish. The peach profile was mostly yellow, candied, and somewhat subdued. At times I thought I was getting a light pear, and maybe a hint of green apple. The peach was the dominant fruit, and it worked. Even at 4.5% it wasn't overpowering and at about a 7/10 on the strength scale.

Sweetness was just below mid-level, and no off or squirrel-y notes. About my only want would have been more peach. As it stood, it was a pretty good Peach Gummy. It never jumped over into a Peach Rings, but stayed squarely in a Peach Gummy. With no off-notes, and the only want for more Peach, I decided to leave this one higher at an **8/10**.

**Pineapple (Fresh) (TPA) 4.5% (10-26-25)** -- Typically most pineapples I've tested fall into 4 categories: Fresh/Natural, Candied/Sugared, Baked/Browned, Juice. This one seemed to straddle 2, almost 3. It had a very good fresh, yellow pineapple taste, with a hint of juice, and some baked/browned notes. It was interesting, because it was fairly complex. The juicy natural notes were impressive and realistic, with some brighter juice notes in there. From the middle and through the finish, it had some nice (unexpected) slightly darker, maybe baked notes. While not truly baked, that was just an approximation, but it was almost like fresh pineapple with some golden syrup notes.

At 4.5% it was nicely strong, with some punchy, bright notes, and I'd rate it about an 8.5/10 on the strength scale. Sweetness levels were a little tricky to quantify, because the initial onrush and middle tasted fairly sweet, but the finish did not. Very interesting. It was almost like it COULD benefit from a dash more sweetness, and I finally decided on a just below mid-level sweet. No off notes, slight if any "funky-ness", and no real complaints. Typically I prefer a much punchier/brighter Pineapple, and my current to go is VTA's Sugarloaf, for comparison. I think my only "want" would have been for a little more sweetener, and some more of the brighter, punchier top end notes. Even sans that, it was a very good pineapple, which was mostly natural with some slight sugared, artificial notes, and was complex-if-ied with some bright, mid, and dark notes. Leaving this one fairly high at a **9/10**.

**Raspberry (Ripe) (TPA) 4.5% (10-25-26)** -- Before testing this one, I was wondering if it would be a slightly different version of their Sweet Raspberry, but it was NOT. For reference, I use both TPA Sweet Raspberry, and Inawera Malina regularly, and love both of them. Some people seem to be put off by some of the sharpness, and maybe some "florals" of the Malina, so that shows that not ANY Raspberry is the RIGHT Raspberry for everyone. The moment I started testing this one, I did a double take, checked the label saying, "Wait, is this a Raspberry Jam" ?? It's jammy-ness hit me right out of the gate, and stayed fairly present to the end. It had some aspects of INW Malina, and some of their Sweet Raspberry, but it was even more. Ripe might be a good description, but maybe sweetened, and jammed might have been better.

At 4.5% it was strong but not overbearing, and about a 9/10 on the strength scale. It had more sweetness than tartness, but just enough of the latter to keep it interesting. I am not floral sensitive, but I can still taste them, and I got none here. No off-notes or complaints that I could detect, and sweetness was 1 tick above mid-level. The Raspberries themselves (yes, more than one), seemed more centered on the mid, and dark varieties, BUT, with some punchy tart sparkle on the finish. All in, it was a keeper, and somewhat like a mashup of INW Malina, and TPA Sweet Raspberry, WITH, a healthy dose of jammy-ness. Because it straddled so many different types and nuances, I could see this one being popular. Handily a **9.7/10**.

**Strawberry (Fresh) (TPA) 4.5% (10-26-25)** -- Luckily, I'm not Strawberry blind, and have never had one I can't taste. This flavor presented as a fat, red Strawberry. No jammy elements this time, and it was far more sweet and smooth, as opposed to tart. It was somewhat juicy, and mostly on the finish, as the initial onrush seemed to be mostly a smooth red one. At 4.5% it was about 8/10 on the strength scale, and sweetness was about mid-level.

With TPA's already well known and widely used Strawberry, and Strawberry Ripe, I'm sure it was no easy feat to squeeze this one into the lineup. No off-notes, or take-offs that I could detect. With so many SB's out there, it can be hard to differentiate one from the pack. Because it didn't have much tart, it could easily be "helped" out with another SB if needed. It's staying power and pairings with creams, etc., is outside the scope of this review. All in, it was a fat, red, very smooth strawberry. Nicely placing it at a **8.5/10**.


**Strawberry (Splash) (TPA) 4.5% (10-28-25)** -- This one goes out to my brother @Torturedzen. Alright guys, this one was a SMASH (not splash) hit, right out of the gate. From the MFG ............."Juicy and vibrant, this flavor leans into sweet strawberry notes with the refreshing notes of a summertime drink." To my tastes, this one had a LOT more saturation, presence, and "snap" than the previously tested Strawberry (Fresh). I had a distinct opinion on the 3 main profiles on this one from the start, and that didn't change at the end. I got clear juicy red, and white strawberries, mixed on top of (maybe) a light lemonade flavor. NOW, before you guys start thinking this was a simple SB Lemonade, it wasn't. It tasted like TPA gently layered in the Lemonade far below the Strawberries (red, and white) just to ACCENT them, not to PARTNER with them. "..... of a summertime drink.". 3 testers later, my assessment didn't change.


At 4.5% it was spot on strong and not lacking at all, and I'd rate at a 9.5/10 on the strength scale. Sweetness was just above mid-level, and it was very enjoyable. With the pairing of both red and white strawberries, it really filled up the "spectrum" leaving even just the SB profile as complex, and adding in the very light but present lemonade just kicked the whole flavor up another two notches. The sweetness was kept in check by a some nicely placed tart notes. All in, this one was a winner in my book. Red and white strawberries, perfectly paired with a light/er lemonade carrier. BBA (Big Bottle Approved). Releasing the Kraken on this one folks. **10/10**, no hesitation. More than just a simple sweet strawberry.

**Sweetener (Stevia) (TPA) 2.5% (11-1-25)** -- Only for YOU guys do I test straight sweetener. I specifically tested this one at 2.5% and wanted to see EXACTLY how it tasted at somewhat higher than normal usage rates. As many of you probably know Stevia's CAN indeed have a bitter, and/or "twangy" finish, so THAT is what I was looking for. TPA hasn't updated their Compound List for this Sweetener (Stevia) yet, but I'll keep an eye on it and let you all know. Stevia can be a great alternative to Sucralose, and EM, with a cleaner, less "gunkier" experience. Most times however it comes down to the Reb (A, D, or M) that they use.

With all that out of the way, at 2.5% this one tasted VERY clean, with NO bitterness, and NO aftertaste at the finish. That is/was actually impressive. I cannot tell if it is pure Stevia, or a mix, but it was clean tasting, lingered slightly after the finish, and tasted very good. There was a VERY slight earthy-ness on the finish, but remember, I'm rolling this solo'd at 2.5%, so I'm going to call it clean as a whistle. At 2.5% it surprisingly didn't "bloom" or wasn't cloyingly sweet, but again, this is at 2.5%, solo'd without any other interaction, but I'll be picking up a bigger bottle and testing it with custards, bakeries, and of course fruits. Clean, no bitterness, no aftertaste and only a whisper of earthy undertones on the finish. Leaving this, the LAST tester in this series very high, at a **9.8/10**.

**Tangerine (TPA) 4.5% (11-1-25)** -- After a little delay, finally got into this one. As a disclaimer, I am not a huge fruit guy, but I LOVED this flavor. Super spot on accurate Tangerine with every nuance you could ask for from the fruit body, AND, a very accurate citrus oil/zest on the finish. That's it in a nutshell, and if you need to tangerine, this one will get it done. The fruit body notes tasted very natural, and while not overly sharp or punchy, had an almost slight blood orange undertone, which helped "fatten" up this one into more of a full spectrum tangerine. At times I got a very light, almost grapefruit nuance to it, and although that might sound strange, absolutely worked.

At 4.5% it was great, and felt like an 8.75/10 on the strength scale. Sweetness was a tick or two below mid level, and I literally GAVE UP trying to find a single nit-pick, off-note, or even a "want" with this one. I'm already working on a "Tangerine-A-Cream", and it's tasting great. If you want a very natural Tangerine, this one should be already in your cart. Fairly complex, full bodied, and with slight Blood Orange, and very light Grapefruit notes, and a stellar citrus oil/zest finish. Smooth, and accurate, with just enough citrus tart to keep you coming back. From the "not fruit" guy, this one was a winner. Releasing the Kraken again, and **10/10**'ing this one, all day long.

**Watermelon Juice (TPA) 4.5% (11-1-25)** -- With this being the LAST flavor in this 16 flavor series, (Sweetener will be next), I was torn between two profiles on this one. The first was a kind of, pretty close WM Juice, and the second was more of a Candied WM sweetened by a Golden Syrup. While it wandered between both during my tests, the latter seemed to be more prevalent. I emphasize Candied WM over a WM Candy, as the Watermelon was in the front, not the candy profile. I felt the sweetener came across as a bit darker than a simple white sugar sweetener, which is why I defined it as more of a [Golden Syrup](https://www.thespruceeats.com/what-is-golden-syrup-5191046), which opened up some darker notes. At 4.5% it was pretty strong, and far more saturated than the previously tested WM Sour Candy, and I'd give this one a 9/10 on the strength scale.

No overt off-notes to be found in this one. The watermelon notes leaned heavily artificial with slight natural notes, and as stated above, had an interesting dark/er undertone. All in, not a bad flavor, BUT, not entirely sold on the "juice" aspect. Candied watermelon, mostly artificial with hints of natural, with a somewhat darker sugared undertone, with it being more of a candied watermelon as opposed to a juice. Leaving it at a **8.5/10**.

**Watermelon Sour Candy (Stevia) (TPA) 4.5% (10-26-25)** -- Not wanting to do two Strawberries back to back, I broke them up with this one. Having used a lot of Stevia, but only for fruits, I was interested to see how that fared here, in a sour candy flavor. Overall, fairly well. It was, well, a watermelon sour candy LOL. It wasn't the strongest flavor, and at 4.5% it tasted lower on the strength scale, around a 5.5/10. Unsure if increasing it would help or not. The watermelon was as expected candied, and artificial, and somewhat sour. Sweetness on the initial onrush felt higher, but on the finish, it seemed to drop off, and at the finish it actually tasted a few clicks below mid-level sweet. It did feel/taste a bit muted, and possibly due to the sour.

I did get an off-note on the finish while it was breaking in, but after it did that dissipated. It also had a slight harshness to it, but only slightly. My biggest want would have been, more watermelon !!! Not terrible, but not outstanding. Good all around flavor for sour candy mixes. Leaving it somewhat lower, at a **7/10**.


TFA New Flavors Sample Pack

https://forum...................../t/new-tpa-tfa-2025-flavors-reviewed-by-sessiondrummer/285581

Hi everyone! I found ya'll while trying to figure out if I could still get coils for my old vape anymore, and figured I'd join up! I'm a 40-something secretary. I've done light vape and traditional hookah before (all non nicotine), but haven't used either in a while. I recently found my old Smok H-PRIV 50W TC, cleaned it up since, charged it, and checked to see if it still worked. It seems to work, but I'm getting a "check atomizer" message, I'm assuming because it desperately needs a new coil. Which is understandable, I was just hoping to test if it worked before incursion in ancient could. Since I can't do that, though, I would like to purchase new coils to test and see if it's still viable. Would anyone know what coils I need or where to find some, pretty please? Pictures included of what I have.

Thought I would start up a thread that points the membership to some great deals. This one just showed up in my news feed and at nearly 50% off, is a freaking steal.

Anker Power Bank Power Station 60,000mAh​

Perfect for those who experience power outages during inclement weather.

Hi, today we're taking a look at the Dead Rabbit 4 RTA, sent to me by Hellvape. In this review, I'll examine each of the features that distinguish this vaporizer. I hope that by the end of this review, you've understood this product and can decide whether or not to invest in it. As always, my opinions are free and based on my personal experience.

► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 RTA; Before we begin, let's take a look at some of the special features listed by the manufacturer:
1. Updated build deck with 48 holes
2. Top-to-bottom airflow
3. Easy filling with a sliding top
4. 810 drip tip



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 RTA; Packaging:
The compact red/black DR4 package features the following on the front: The Hellvape logo, the identifying wording "RTA DEAD RABBIT 4," a sticker indicating the color of this vaporizer, and a product image. The back features the specifications, parameters, packing list, logos, and trademarks. The remaining parts of the packaging include the product name (Dead Rabbit 4), the slogan "Evolve your vaping genius," a scratch & check, a sticker with the batch number, and the color of this sample.





► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 RTA; Packing List:
• 1* Dead Rabbit 4 RTA
• 1* Bubble Glass
• 2* 0.37Ω Ni80 Clapton Coils
• 1* Accessory Bag
• 2* Cotton Ties
• 1* Coil Trimming Tool
• 1* User Manual



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 RTA; Specifications:
• Dimensions: 26x49.5mm
• Net Weight: 59g
• Capacity: 3.5ml, 5.5ml, 2ml (TPD)
• Replaceable 810 Drip Tip
• Dual Coils Postless Deck with 48 Airholes
• Adjustable Top Airflow
• Slide Open Fill



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 RTA; Available Colors:
• SS
• BLUE
• GUNMETAL
• GOLD
• MATTE BLACK
• MATTE FULL BLACK
• BLACK GOLD



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 RTA; Introduction:
Hellvape continues to relentlessly improve its Dead Rabbit series. The new Dead Rabbit 4 RTA uses thicker and more robust construction materials. The build deck features 48 holes to maximize cloud production. Furthermore, the coil build space has been increased to 13mm, making it even easier to build. The Dead Rabbit 4 RTA maintains a top-to-bottom airflow path to ensure a 100% leak-proof system. The refill system is as simple as it gets, featuring a securely locked slide that prevents accidental opening. My two samples for this review came with an additional bubble tank and the classic straight tube. The straight tube appears to be polycarbonate rather than glass as stated in the specifications. It should be noted that the versions I own are "samples" and are subject to future modifications. The user manual also mentions a possible PRO version, which would also feature a metal armor to protect the tube glass. We'll see how it develops.
Enjoy the read.



Naturally, when choosing to use a high-powered dual-coil RTA like this, it's important to pair it with dual-battery mods that can push it to high power and provide the user with a good reserve of energy. In this case, a great pairing with the DR4 would be the Centaurus BT200 mod I recently reviewed. However, I won't push the power too far, so I find the Dead Rabbit 4 RTA pairs very well with simple and easy-to-use 21700 mods. In the image below, you can see the Dead Rabbit 4 RTA with a straight glass tube (3.5ml) installed on an Innokin Kroma 217.



► Hellvape Dead Rabbit 4 RTA; Exploded view:
The tank is completely removable for thorough cleaning. The threads and various joints are well-crafted, as usual, and handling this tank reveals a high-quality structural sturdiness, in keeping with Hellvape's finest traditions.

Hey all, new member but long time lurker. Ive been vaping for about a decade now and couldnt afford all the mech mods i really wanted back in the day until now but unfortunately alot of the mods i want are no longer available online. That being said, i was really hoping someone here might have some rig mods for sale or know where I could find some. I really want one of the legacy rigs to add to my collection, if anyone could help me one id really appreciate it!