Just to explain further... I didn't really think my examples were "duckies and bunnies" or random allergy-type commercials (I feel like my contributions are the ones being called that.) The images were meant to actually invoke a positive feeling towards CASAA and the work we are doing.
The woman with the blue sky - taking a breath of fresh air, away from cigarette smoke, she is enjoying freedom from the bondage of analogs and the freedom of choice.
And I already explained the little girl - invokes safeness, gentleness, innocence, fresh air, "save the children" (ie no second hand smoke) and the dandelion floating in the air as something that is an alternative to smoke being blown into the air (ie vapor.)
Neither image was just randomly chosen - they were meant to envoke positive feelings in smokers and non-smokers alike.
We need to remember that we are trying to appeal to non-smokers, too. And that these aren't e-cig or snus ads.
Are people who are already using e-cigs & snus and the like really our target audience? If so, we can create a whole different kind of ad campaign for them. My ads were aimed at non-vapers, smokers and non-smokers.
Also, I think smokers are sick of seeing quit smoking warnings and ads. This is meant to say, "There is an alternative."
Anyhow, just my 2 cent clarification...
And I would agree--after all, what is wrong with ""duckies and bunnies" or random allergy-type commercials--if they work for Madison Avenue Main Stream advertising, why are they no good for this group? Those marketing people spend millions on demographics to see what kind of advertising does and does not work and if that is what they put their money on, then it is good enough for me.
Sun