Since last Saturday I have been testing the sample smileomizer that John sent out and have found:
a) Taste of the sample smileomizer is as good as any of the best previous smileomizers, with lots of vapor production.
b) The sample smileomizer lacks the tight draw that the previous smileomizers had (even with the tiny hole in the metal tip).
c) As the sample smileomizer aged the draw did not tighten up allowing it to last much longer.
This is the main difference; lacks a tight draw and doesn’t tighten up as it ages allowing it to last longer.
For me: That is what the problem is with the current smileomizers – they start out very tight and get much tighter as they age cutting the life span down by more than 50%.
It seems like V4L might have solved the problems with the smileomizers. I look forward to ordering the newer smileomizers when they come out on the website.
Thanks for letting me try it out.
Bill
a) Taste of the sample smileomizer is as good as any of the best previous smileomizers, with lots of vapor production.
b) The sample smileomizer lacks the tight draw that the previous smileomizers had (even with the tiny hole in the metal tip).
c) As the sample smileomizer aged the draw did not tighten up allowing it to last much longer.
This is the main difference; lacks a tight draw and doesn’t tighten up as it ages allowing it to last longer.
For me: That is what the problem is with the current smileomizers – they start out very tight and get much tighter as they age cutting the life span down by more than 50%.
It seems like V4L might have solved the problems with the smileomizers. I look forward to ordering the newer smileomizers when they come out on the website.
Thanks for letting me try it out.
Bill