But in the meantime,
@AttyPops, maybe you can explain to me WHY I had
such a hard time finding somebody to
carry through in doing the job, even
after they agreed to it. It's still a mystery to me!!!
Sigh. The fact you don't understand that shows why you're missing the boat on the bet thing too.
He rescheduled on you several times. There's a reason for that. And all of them would probably do the same thing, to varying degrees, no matter who you picked.
Imagine that you owned that business. You pay guys to work for you (seasonally), and have equipment, material, and facilities expenses.
You book your schedule as full as you can, because you have to make a profit. You don't want big gaps in the schedule with down-time, as the equipment sits idle, and you have to pay people for doing nothing. So working = money. Not working = losing money. Right?
BUT....there's a "base cost" to doing any job. Transporting people and equipment to/from site. Travel time = expense. Going back a 2nd day is extra expense, but is necessary if the job can't be done in a day.
Basically, Bear, your job was "fill in work". That is to say, a basic small job that they schedule when they are in the neighborhood and will have an extra 1/4 day or 1/2 day available to "squeeze" you in. Maybe a sub-group dispatched from the main group working 5 blocks away.
He can't really charge you what he'd want/need to charge you for a 4x8 area to make decent money, as it would cost double what you probably paid. He's gong to charge you whatever he can get away with at reasonable cost and schedule you as fill-in to take up any "otherwise idle time" since he's paying these employees in the area anyway.
So the fact that you got "bumped" several times is due to his scheduling needs and other priorities (and any other circumstances I don't know about). Basically, he's glad to have the fill-in work, but it's hard to schedule and you don't get $$$ hit as hard as you could be, but you have to be flexible. Many places wouldn't even take it if they're real busy. Later in the fall they might have more "idle time" and you could have competed for prices.
Basically, he either lost money on the job as "good will/advertising", broke even as "fill in work" or made enough money to
buy lunch.
EDIT: Buuuut... he didn't LOSE money (or he lost less money), compared to if he had had his people idle. So even if your work is a loss, it's a "less loss"/cost savings measure compared to no work at all.
P.P.S./Edit: All guesswork on my part, of course. I've not done any asphalt work.
P.P.P.S He should probably explain that more-or-less to you; that he'll take the job and you'd need to be flexible and he'd schedule you as time permits between jobs.