Paraphrased from ECF's battery warning thread: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...9007-warning-rechargeable-batteries-apvs.html
Note 1
Li-Mn or Li-FePo4 rechargeables made by for example AW are a safer technology battery that can be used - they need no protection.
Current information is that AW IMR Li-Mn rechargeables are the safest batteries for use in APVs.
Ron -
Hey man, I completely understand how you feel. You have to do what you feel is right for you. I will add that a lot of devices were made and tested prior to the AW IMR being made. The difference in the protected battery and the AW IMR is the protected battery uses a protection circuit that shuts the battery down to possibly keep it from a catastrophic failure whereas the AW IMR is a safer chemistry battery to prevent that from happening. I will say that in the past several months, a lot of vendors that once recommended the protected batteries, (as you've stated), in their APV's, have changed their description to the AW IMR safer chemistry batteries as they have a pretty positive track record to date in the industry. Not to mention they are the best high drain battery on the market, but with the addition of the new Panasonics they are getting a run for their money. Though I have only seen the Panasonics in 18650 size so far. I heard they are going to be manufacturing in different sizes for the vaping community though. I also believe I read a few posts as to the amp limit being a lot higher on the AW IMR by almost double that if the ICR that you are using, which would make them safer as they don't get overpowered by a lot of the APV's in todays market. I think the max discharge rate for the protected is 5.2 amps and the safer chemistry is 10 amps. There are a few posts on the forum about this topic and there was a lot of good info about batteries with the unfortunate incidents in Florida and Colorado this past year. I do know that the Efest batteries are relatively new in the vaping industry and they are also "safer chemistry" the same as the AW IMR's. I have suspicions that they are actually made by AW and re-branded with the Efest label. They are certainly very similar in all aspects.... I could be wrong about the re-branding but it is certainly coincidental though.....
Very nice find Ron..... I was looking, but obviously not in the right place..... Thanks....
Thanks guys for your input. I dont doubt that the IMRs are safer by nature, my concern was that something about my mod would be wrong for them and cause them to do somehting that would normally not happen. i was concerned that i would be using the batteries incorrectly. it clearly states to use protected only in my mod. i erred on the side of caution, but i dont know how cautious i am in the long run. its only a matter of time until i get a single batt device anyway so i am comfortable with my current setup for the time being.
as far as the efests being rebranded AW, i guess anything is possible but i think the Efests were non-button top batts. the AWs appeard to be button top, if that matters.