well mine is the very first release and i like it a lot so the newer ones can only get better...
throjh" data-source="post: 3983534" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">Next step up is with a passthrough option on this batt!
Just a little jibber jabber relating to the post. Two hours really doesn't sound bad to me. A dual coil is kind of like operating two single coils simultaneously so a halving of time as compared to a single coil - it seems - should be a reasonable expectation. It would also seem that the resulting vapor/mist would not be twice as hot as might be expected from halving the resistance but instead a greater volume of vapor/mist that one might compensate for by taking perhaps shorter duration hits. To the extent that one shortens the duration of each hit, the halving of batt time as compared to the single coil becomes less expected. But the doubling of the vapor/mist at less than scorching temperatures would seem to offer the vaper greater options to find that "incredible" vape without having to eat a burnt steak. JMO. I need to try one of those dual coils.
You said it right: boosted and regulated.
The regulation part seems to be missing (or very weak) in the first version.
But then, we're only assuming they would be regulated...
As soon as someone checks the output with an oscilloscope or an RMS voltmeter, all will be clearer.
I'll do it when I have the chance.
The center post needed to be lifted for it to work. On the highest setting it's the best combination I've found so far - incredible!!! The problem is the battery only lasts about 2 hours.
Pretty sure that what you will find on the oscilloscope is all three levels of selection are pulse width modulated - and no boost present. Low will have a duty rate of about 76%, mid-range at about 90% and high 99% or so. AC measurements are showing about 1.6 at low, about 0.9 at mid-range and very small at high but not zero. At same time I read the AC, DC read 2.77 at low, 3.33 at mid-range and 3.76 at high. The AC and DC reads suggest RMS values of 3.21 at low, 3.45 at mid-range and 3.76 at high. These numbers suggest that power at mid-selection is about 84% of power at high and power at low about 73% of high. Had readings perhaps been more precise and accurate I think the RMS values would have turned to have produced power reductions identical to the duty rate percentages.
It seems to me the VV eGo is a hybrid of a Joye eGo and a Riva. Joye eGo varies the duty cycle of the PWM output so as to produce a consistent DC reading and, I think, relatively consistent power output throughout its discharge cycle life. Riva does not modulate and as a result produces greater power output in early stages as compared to eGo but less toward the end. The VV eGo is basically a Riva at its high selection and is a moderated Riva at the other two selection levels using PWM to achieve the moderation.
That level of efficiency for the blue setting from a PWM circuit is unlikely.
Even more when the previous "DC" readings (most likely flawed) show a performance a bit higher than a simple li-ion bat.
...
Mine and ITA's.
99% efficiency is unlikely, yes. Expect a higher power drop introduced by the circuit even in it's higher duty cycle.