In my what seems to be never ending search for the perfect vaping experience , I have tried lots of things with varied results. I started with a kr808d-1, tried a 901, picked up a 510 , then a riva and an ego.
I have tried lots of different atty's and cartomizer's and these are just a few of my thoughts , and what i hope will someday be changed by manufacture's .
i have standard attomizer's , and i have low resistance atty's , i have different cartomizer's from different suppliers in different Ohm ratings .
For me personally i feel that all the 510 cartomizer's have to much of a air flow .
if you use an automatic battery from time to time you will notice it more , it is just a real airy draw ( like a ultra light analog )
I have tightened this up by plugging one of the holes , this helps me greatly.
Now on to resistance .
When i am at home and can drip a lr atty is fine , when using a stock 510 or riva ego etc, but when i put it on a mod running a true 3.7 it's a little much.
But what i have found is i like a 306 atty and dripping better on the ego battery , it gives tons of vapor and the flavor still hangs in there, these are giving me ratings of 2.3 ohm so it is a good match for the 3.0 to 3.2 these batteries are putting out
Now on to cartomizer's . i have these in 2.7 3.4 and some v4l carto's that are at 2.3 ( these are for a kr808d-1 ) and i use an adapter for these on a 510.
For true 3.7 vaping i like the 3.4 cartomizer's better, hands down! they don't burn up & the flavor and vapor are off the hook!!!
For use with a 510, riva , ego , i have found i am getting the best performance off a V4L 2.3 ohm cartomizer , with the 3.4 the vapor is really weak and the throat hit just isn't there. With the 2.7 ohm cartomizer it just feels like a comprimise, but when i put the 2.3 ohm carto back on it's like it is unleashed.( i would also like to note that the draw on the kr808 carto with a 510 adapter is just right )
What I am getting at is that it would be nice to have one more option for a 510 cartomizer. A 510 CARTOMIZER AT 2.3 OHM WITH SMALLER DIAMETER AIR HOLES.
If that was out there i would have all things covered
I have tried lots of different atty's and cartomizer's and these are just a few of my thoughts , and what i hope will someday be changed by manufacture's .
i have standard attomizer's , and i have low resistance atty's , i have different cartomizer's from different suppliers in different Ohm ratings .
For me personally i feel that all the 510 cartomizer's have to much of a air flow .
if you use an automatic battery from time to time you will notice it more , it is just a real airy draw ( like a ultra light analog )
I have tightened this up by plugging one of the holes , this helps me greatly.
Now on to resistance .
When i am at home and can drip a lr atty is fine , when using a stock 510 or riva ego etc, but when i put it on a mod running a true 3.7 it's a little much.
But what i have found is i like a 306 atty and dripping better on the ego battery , it gives tons of vapor and the flavor still hangs in there, these are giving me ratings of 2.3 ohm so it is a good match for the 3.0 to 3.2 these batteries are putting out
Now on to cartomizer's . i have these in 2.7 3.4 and some v4l carto's that are at 2.3 ( these are for a kr808d-1 ) and i use an adapter for these on a 510.
For true 3.7 vaping i like the 3.4 cartomizer's better, hands down! they don't burn up & the flavor and vapor are off the hook!!!
For use with a 510, riva , ego , i have found i am getting the best performance off a V4L 2.3 ohm cartomizer , with the 3.4 the vapor is really weak and the throat hit just isn't there. With the 2.7 ohm cartomizer it just feels like a comprimise, but when i put the 2.3 ohm carto back on it's like it is unleashed.( i would also like to note that the draw on the kr808 carto with a 510 adapter is just right )
What I am getting at is that it would be nice to have one more option for a 510 cartomizer. A 510 CARTOMIZER AT 2.3 OHM WITH SMALLER DIAMETER AIR HOLES.
If that was out there i would have all things covered