No! Once the joose vendor opens a container of a USP ingredient for mixing, it's no longer USP certified... unless the vendor follows the same certification process as the original ingredient manufacturer.
Note that most, if not all, joose vendors publish "made with USP ingredients"; not "USP joose".
I think my point still stands. Are juice makers willing to be held to the same standards they use themselves when buying their ingredients?
At this point in vaping history it is up to us, the consumers, to get what we want from the e-liquid venders, else things will definitely go awry. Deal only with AEMSA members and other venders will surely jump on the bandwagon of self-regulation.
I have read a few pages of this thread and I see some of both sides. While I don't want gov or FDA telling me what or how to vape, I do wish that somehow we could do more to self regulate ourselves.
For instance to be a vendor on ecf u have to go through a process and be approved, but that is only on paper, it would make me feel better if there were some sort of on site inspection (by vapers!!) Before u could be a vendor. As I am sure u know not everything that looks good on paper really is.
Of course I get that ecf claims no responsibility for what any vendor does, but I feel that if there was at least an eyes on process that it would eliminate a lot of shady vendors that may have otherwise been let into ecf. I would love to think every vendor is honest and wonderful, but that's just not the case. We need someone looking out for vapers, especially new ones, but vets too. Ecf just seems the likely place to do it since they are the biggest and world wide.
Even tho I enjoy the mom and pop shops and appreciate the craftsmanship, it is still difficult to buy from vendors u just don't know. Even after almost 2 years I still wonder every time I hit that "place order" button if I am going to get took. Until I get what I paid for it's nerve racking.
But I still take that risk all the time and will continue to even if I do get ripped off, I would rather risk
my wallet than go back to cigs.
And who is to say that any FDA made ecig would be any better than what we have now? These are the ppl who lied to us already!! They are the ones pushing us to take chantix instead of Vape!!
No thank u, been there, done that. If I eat at a place and the food makes me sick, I don't go back, ever. So the FDA is not somewhere I want my ecig from. They can make sure.my nic is pure and stay out of the rest.
All I really want is a huge ecig market with mods, hardware and juice from every vendor so I can see and try it all, that's as close to Walmart as I want vaping to get.
Sent from my SPH-D710VMUB using Tapatalk 2
For the record, this is incorrect. No 2-4mg nicotine limit in the UK.
amount to an effective ban if regulators demand impossibly high standards of proof or
take these products off the market in 2013 as there is no transition period to allow manufacturers to apply for and get the necessary authorisation and it would be illegal to sell them as soon as the directive comes into force, which could be as soon as 2013
take these products off the market for many years as most or all manufacturers will struggle to get the necessary marketing authorisation from regulators, who may all disagree with each other around Europe
apply restrictions that make these products unattractive to smokers through packaging requirements, marketing restrictions, bans on flavours, technical limitations imposed;
greatly close down competition, limit innovation, raise costs leaving the market to big players, such as tobacco or pharma companies, that can cope with the huge burdens that comes with medicines regulation.
The directive treats e-cigarettes below a certain threshold as consumer products. The very weakest form of e-cigarettes (with liquids below threshold of nicotine density 4mg/ml) might escape medicines regulation. But these are extremely weak in e-cigarette terms, and not regarded as adequate substitutes for conventional cigarettes and unlikely to do much to help people switch from smoking. More on this in
my briefing on the directive.
Why would governments make it harder to put these products on the market than the much more dangerous products they are designed to replace or compete with? Read novelist Lionel Shriver (We need to talk about Kevin) on Puritans and the powerful and tobacco smokers cant take the fact that electronic cigarettes are harmless and enjoyable.
...
I get the impression that most vapers here like the way the vaping world is structured and want it to stay the way it is.
...from what ive seen a large part of the vaping world is mom and pop, basement and low budget setups.
...
I feel like it needs science and money to create facts and hard evidence about it.
...
I order ejuice that has poison and chemicals is it and jo blow is mixing it up in his basement. Who the hell is jo blow? I need juice but I want Dr science mixing it up using his sterile lab to analyze it before he sends it to me.
...
I want the health department watching where he does it, what he puts in it and how the final product turns out.
Paragraphs are READERS friends!
Since I DIY, one of da last visitors I want to see is the health department, or any fracking governmental agency for that matter!
Get the government involved, and you will end up with 3 corporations making ejuice, and injecting carcinogenic substances to try to get you addicted to their ejuice. Sound familiar?