This message was posted on the We Are CASAA Facebook page:
[h=6]I saw an anti-cigarette ad on TV today showing a big gas truck thing and a guy in a suit hosing down kids/etc with "smoke" and all the dangers of it. Please, please tell me there's a way to find out if they were using PG to hose these people down since it's safe. By the looks of it, these people were hosed down with more vapor than I produce in an entire year.[/h]Later, Chris tracked down a copy of the ad here: Live Tobacco-Free Austin | Sherry Matthews Advocacy Marketing | Tanker | WE LOVE AD
In the comment section, Steve Chase asked: "Obviously real smoke wasn't used in this commercial. What was used to simulate the smoke?"
The response: "Fog juice"... aka: Propylene Glycol??
If inhaling PG is dangerous, surely they wouldn't be going out and spraying unsuspecting actors with it, now would they?
[h=6]I saw an anti-cigarette ad on TV today showing a big gas truck thing and a guy in a suit hosing down kids/etc with "smoke" and all the dangers of it. Please, please tell me there's a way to find out if they were using PG to hose these people down since it's safe. By the looks of it, these people were hosed down with more vapor than I produce in an entire year.[/h]Later, Chris tracked down a copy of the ad here: Live Tobacco-Free Austin | Sherry Matthews Advocacy Marketing | Tanker | WE LOVE AD
Philosophy
A new public service campaign for Austin, Texas Live tobacco-Free program makes the point that secondhand smoke is a danger wherever it occurs, indoors or out. Conceived by Sherry Matthews Advocacy Marketing, Austin, and directed by Scott McCullough, the new 30-second spot, in English and Spanish versions, shows a large tanker truck driving through Austin as a worker in a haz-mat suit sprays unsuspecting residents with thick, billowy clouds of noxious fumes. People at an outdoor restaurant, kids playing in a park and pedestrians strolling along a path react in horror and disgust as they are enveloped by the sooty smoke. The voiceover notes that secondhand cigarette smoke contains 7,000 chemicals, many harmful to humans, and directs consumers to the Live tobacco-Free Austin website for more information.
In the comment section, Steve Chase asked: "Obviously real smoke wasn't used in this commercial. What was used to simulate the smoke?"
The response: "Fog juice"... aka: Propylene Glycol??
If inhaling PG is dangerous, surely they wouldn't be going out and spraying unsuspecting actors with it, now would they?