Anti-smoking TV ad sprays actors with "smoke" simulated with Propylene Glycol

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
This message was posted on the We Are CASAA Facebook page:
[h=6]I saw an anti-cigarette ad on TV today showing a big gas truck thing and a guy in a suit hosing down kids/etc with "smoke" and all the dangers of it. Please, please tell me there's a way to find out if they were using PG to hose these people down since it's safe. By the looks of it, these people were hosed down with more vapor than I produce in an entire year.[/h]Later, Chris tracked down a copy of the ad here: Live Tobacco-Free Austin | Sherry Matthews Advocacy Marketing | Tanker | WE LOVE AD


Philosophy
A new public service campaign for Austin, Texas’ Live tobacco-Free program makes the point that secondhand smoke is a danger wherever it occurs, indoors or out. Conceived by Sherry Matthews Advocacy Marketing, Austin, and directed by Scott McCullough, the new 30-second spot, in English and Spanish versions, shows a large tanker truck driving through Austin as a worker in a haz-mat suit sprays unsuspecting residents with thick, billowy clouds of noxious fumes. People at an outdoor restaurant, kids playing in a park and pedestrians strolling along a path react in horror and disgust as they are enveloped by the sooty smoke. The voiceover notes that secondhand cigarette smoke contains 7,000 chemicals, many harmful to humans, and directs consumers to the Live tobacco-Free Austin website for more information.

In the comment section, Steve Chase asked: "Obviously real smoke wasn't used in this commercial. What was used to simulate the smoke?"

The response: "Fog juice"... aka: Propylene Glycol??

If inhaling PG is dangerous, surely they wouldn't be going out and spraying unsuspecting actors with it, now would they?
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
I wonder if the director might be mistaken. There is some concern about lipoid pneumonia with use of oil-based fogging liquids.

At Harvard, there is a limit on exposure to fogs created using glycols. No use is allowed for oil-based liquids.

Airborne Media Policy

I sent an email to the director, asking him to double-check which type of liquid was used to generate the artificial smoke.
 
Last edited:

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
I wonder if the director might be mistaken. There is some concern about lipoid pneumonia with use of oil-based fogging liquids.

At Harvard, there is a limit on exposure to fogs created using glycols. No use is allowed for oil-based liquids.

Airborne Media Policy

I sent an email to the director, asking him to double-check which type of liquid was used to generate the artificial smoke.

Yes, I actually mentioned the lipid pneumonia issue on our Facebook group page. They probably figured it wouldn't hurt anyone since they are outside. A law of physics which cigarette smoke (and only cigarette smoke) seems to break. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
I have received the following email message from the Director of the Tanker ad:

the ingredient mixed with the water to create the fog is called Glycol, it is used in food, the same stuff they use in nightclubs and theaters, not dangerous

Sincerely, Scott McCullough
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread