Hi Kurt,
Thanks for the great work!
uh, what is BO?
You mention custards, would that extend to chocolates as well?
Thanks!
Any sweet desert flavor, especially creamy ones, are suspect.
Hi Kurt,
Thanks for the great work!
uh, what is BO?
You mention custards, would that extend to chocolates as well?
Thanks!
This is good, but only if the limit of detection is about 1 microgram/mL or less. That is generally where the test becomes more expensive. I have seen many less expensive test results where the limit of detection is very high, making false negatives when significant DA/AP is actually present very possible.
I'll get more details on the process and sensitivity. I am thinking about just submitting my own samples for testing just to find out for myself.
It surprises me the lack of reaction the e-juice manufacturers have had. The liabilities are enormous. I can see future lawsuits on this basis. If I were in the business I would have in house testing capability as well as third party confirmation and keep batch certificates on file for the next 30 years. Big Tobacco proves the degree of liability and industry can be subjected to if society chooses to vilify a product and pursue it as a public health concern. Tobacco Bonds are just the beginning of how BT is going to fall.
"Under the Master Settlement Agreement, or MSA, struck 16 years ago between the biggest U.S. tobacco companies and 46 U.S. states, the companies make annual payments to the states using a complex formula tied to U.S. tobacco shipments. The accord ended years of litigation brought by the states, which had sought to recoup healthcare costs for treating ailments tied to smoking.
The states with the highest populations, such as California and New York, are owed the most. The majority of them arranged to get much of their money up front by selling bonds and pledging the annual payments to the bond holders.
The only problem is that as tobacco shipments decline, so do the payments. And sales of e-cigarettes, which now appear to be helping to accelerate the tobacco-consumption decline rate, are not counted as cigarette sales under the MSA.
The outlook for tobacco bonds is so dire that a forecast last month from Moody's Investors Service predicted 65 to 80 percent were headed toward default."
Legislators pay lip service to public health, but when you structure the liability in an economic framework, the chickens come home to roost real quick.
In house testing for DA and AP would be wickedly expensive, and require highly skilled chemists very familiar with the assay to carry it out. This is not just injecting a juice into a GC-MS. There are a lot of variables in flavors that make this problem a difficult one to solve. Far better, IMHO, to go with an independent pro lab that can give results with low LOD. Discounts are often available with batch testing.
'DA and AP were found in a large proportion of sweet-flavored EC liquids, at levels that were higher than the strictest safety limits but significantly lower compared to smoking.'
This quote is all I needed to see. Yes, there are hazardous chemicals *when inhaled* in e-liquid, but we all couldn't be so blind as to think vaping was completely harmless. Most of us used vaping as a tool to get off of cigarettes, as we wanted to improve our health, and continued because we love it.
As long as there are *significantly* lower levels of DA and AP (and any other hazardous when inhaled chemical for that matter) in e-juice, I know I've made the right decision. Thanks for posting this.
I'm no doctor, but because the process is vaporization instead of combustion I wonder if there is a difference in absorption or bioavailability.
Diacetyl is supposedly safe to eat, but the vapors of cooking where it's present aren't safe to breath. Strange, huh?