Its all being funded by people like philip morris to try and kill the electronic cigarette industries so they can sell more tobacco!
This isn't as likely as it may appear.
For instance, PM was (allegedly) looking in to buying Ruyan Group less than a year ago. With more and more states going smoke-free, tobacco companies have enough incentive to sell a product that can be used where smoking is prohibited.
Two years ago, Camel sent me a sample of snus. I had no idea what I was supposed to do with it, and was afraid if I got hooked on it, I'd never be able to buy more. Now it's available in almost every gas station, with several brands and flavors to choose from.
Similarly (because this always seems to go hand-in-hand when conspiracy theories are afoot), Pfizer does okay selling Chantix. But you're only supposed to use Chantix for three months.
From a profitability standpoint, someone with high blood pressure who continues to smoke and has a doctor willing to prescribe the blood pressure medication du jour is a goldmine. One one hand, you have an expensive pill you take for three months. On the other, a somewhat less expensive pill you take forever.
Tobacco and drug companies have every incentive in the world to keep nicotine flowing in you. How that actually happens is inconsequential.
I also believe we should really go after them and keep showing how bad Analogs are compared to vaping. The big hitters need to do some more comparative infomercials and introduce to the public the difference in smoking vs Vaping and get more people vaping to put Big tobacco in the back seat
The
only way this is going to happen, is if there is independent, credible, and peer-reviewed evidence that e-cigs are safe.
At best right now, there's "Some company from China paid for a study in New Zealand, and it turned out pretty okay." and arguments that
appear logical, but haven't been tested. Sure, PG is generally recognized as safe. But the effects of intentionally inhaling it vaporized multiple times daily aren't exactly easy to find. It
should be reasonably safe. But that's not the same as "It
is safe."
Oddly enough, it could be PM that spends the money or greases the wheels to get that research developed and released to the public.