I fear citizen complaints about this will get nowhere. It's time to call up a Big Gun.
In nearby New Zealand, you have the biggest gun in the e-smoking world: Dr. Murray Laugesen, head of Health New Zealand, which has been conducting e-smoking clinical trials for Ruyan for a year now. It's his reports we depend on to assure the safety of what we're doing.
We need him to argue why use of nicotine in inhalation devices should not only be allowed, but encouraged. From my dealings with him, I think he believes that to be true.
He needs to say that millions of Australians are addicted to nicotine. It is a highly addictive chemical and most users obtain it from burning
tobacco and inhaling the smoke. Along with the smoke, they take in numerous carcinogenic chemicals that are produced when
tobacco is combusted. That doesn't have to be their only option when vaporizing nicotine is considered.
He needs to say that nicotine does have some health consequences, not all of them bad. It has not been shown to trigger heart attacks in healthy humans. Its impacts are no worse than other, legal stimulants. On the positive side, it has been used to treat ADHD, dementia and Parkinson's Disease.
He needs to say that nicotine derived from vapor is certainly no more dangerous than nicotine derived from smoking
tobacco. In fact, studies show each inhalation of vapor contains only one-fifth the nicotine of a similar cigarette puff. The net result of inhaling nicotine this way would surely be a savings in health costs and years added to smokers' lives.
He needs to say that so-called electric cigarettes can be used in any environment, since they produce no fire or spark. They produce no second-hand smoke, and the exhaled vapor has been tested to show no substances that could irritate anyone nearby.
He needs to say present nicotine-replacement therapies are ineffective for the vast majority of smokers using them to attempt quitting. Vapor devices replace both habit and addiction, offering users an effective and likely safe alternative to "quit or die."
He needs to say the world needs a nicotine delivery system that can be sustained indefinitely. Many smokers find it difficult or impossible to quit, so they continue the harmful practice of inhaling tobacco smoke. Present NRT products are not advised for long-term use. Vaporizing nicotine gives smokers a better choice for long-term use.
He needs to ask for time to study this further, for a suspension of the order while those studies are underway, so that those now vaporizing nicotine can continue to use what many have found to be a better way of obtaining addictive nicotine.
These arguments might not help. But only a voice as expert as his can have a hope of being seriously considered. You're a citizen of Australia, Trumpy. Send this to Dr. Laugesen at the email address on Health New Zealand's Web site. Ask him to lend his expertise to this smoking alternative. There is a possibility he is not aware of the new ban.