Nope. Its called common courtesy. I don't carry around copies of studies with me to justify my personal choices nor do I expect non vapers to read them so that they will feel better about what I'm choosing to do. As far as other pollutants, I don't care if they have a .... lab setup in their rumpus room.... I'm not doing it.
If you think its totally benign you are kidding yourself. I know for a fact that if I get a high nicotine content liquid and hit it really hard a few times then I'm going to get light headed. If I continue to hit it hard I'm going to get a headache. Thats why they sell various levels, so that we can adjust our nicotine intake to our personal preference. How many comments here have you seen about vapers dropping nicotine levels because of a new device they were using or the sub ohm coils they just twisted were delivering too much nicotine for them? Do you honestly believe that all of that is absorbed before you exhale?
Obviously something to that and I don't need a study to prove it to me. Personal observations are plenty for me.
So as a matter of common courtesy I have decided that I won't be subjecting anyone to my second hand vape without their consent. I will never subject a child to my second hand vape under any avoidable circumstance. Some things I just won't do.
Someone who has their kids in an ecig store with a vaping lounge obviously isn't expecting people to not vape.
You wouldn't be avoiding vaping around the kids out of common courtesy, you would avoid it because you've been conditioned to think of yourself as a smoker and vapor as second hand smoke (which was proven to not be dangerous but those results were lied about, BTW).
That whole post has nothing to do with anything said here. It is simply you trying to justify irrational behavior with the claim of courtesy.
This is what I believe about what is being exhaled, http://publichealth.drexel.edu/SiteData/docs/ms08/f90349264250e603/ms08.pdf
"Conclusions
By the standards of occupational hygiene, current data do not indicate that exposures to vapers from contaminants in electronic cigarettes warrant a concern.
There are no known toxicological synergies among compounds in the aerosol, and mixture of the contaminants does not pose a risk to health."
"The cautions about propylene glycol and glycerin apply only to the exposure experienced by the vapers themselves.
Exposure of bystanders to the listed ingredients, let alone the contaminants, does not warrant a concern as the exposure is likely to be orders of magnitude lower than exposure experienced by vapers"
I don't carry that around with me to justify vaping around people. Common courtesy is if someone has a problem with it I move.
It has nothing to do with common courtesy if you choose to ignore the research and treat vapor as second hand smoke. It has nothing to do with courtesy for you to say, "Kids and vape shops shouldn't mix."