I was wondering the same thing. So far the kanger mini tanks are working well and easy to clean. May try some other suggestions soon.
- Status
I just ordered a couple of HH357's from Avid. How do you think the Nano's would compare to the HH357? I've been focusing on my juices a lot lately and need some easy, very good vape gear to test samples. I have many different RBA's and rda's, but I don't always want to make a new coil to test a quick new juice or two and I think my question is also along the lines the OP has asked. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Best to you!
Bill, my guess is that the flavor of the atomizer would be superior to that of a Nano. It is, after all, a clearomizer, which are known to mute at least some flavors. Not everyone likes dripping; it like most vaping techniques has a learning curve to fully enjoy it.
I was never much of a dripper, so the Nano were adequate for my purposes.
I was never much of a dripper, so the Nano were adequate for my purposes.
I'm getting ready to dive into DIY, and am looking to get a few of these so I can sample just a few drops. 3.0 ohm 510 Atomizer - MVari/Lambo
The Nano is a great little device for carrying a couple with you when out and about. the Joye cone will fit over them giving extra stability to the Nano and makes for a nice look when combined with an Ego twist.
I've had a couple of issues:
1. When cleaning them, the water (even when using PGA) often remains for a long time in them and if not completely dried out (I've needed to let them sit for weeks sometimes) will boil on use giving a very hot (burn your lips and tongue on the steam) vape.
2. Some have a plastic taste when new. This can be remedied by soaking in white venigar--but see #1.
3. Any time I have tried a dry burn (no matter how short the burn), it creates a permanent plastic taste which cannot be removed and ruins the Nano.
But at $2 ea, they are great little devices.
- Status
Similar threads
