Status
Not open for further replies.

slopes

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 19, 2009
616
210
London, UK
You are doing both the olive oil and the parafin soaks ?

I've still got yesterday's paraffin (mineral oil) soak sitting in my icing gun filtering off after 24 hours (this is separate from the experiment I mentioned two posts back). The mineral oil has separated but looks murky... I don't think it will clear any further now, so I might go to the next stage.
 
Returning to my post of a few days ago (see above) - which was pointed out to be dangerous as it contained a potentially hazardous non-consumable which may leave harmful trace elements... I've done some further searching around and believe that the lighter fluid could be replaced with a food-grade Limonene (specifically, D-limonene) - which is non-polar. This can be bought for around £13 per 100ml ($20).

So such a revised procedure could be re-stated as:

1) Heat and simmer the ground tobacco in a sodium carbonate solution. Reduce.

2) Filter off liquid and place filtered liquid in bottle (throw away cooked tobacco).

3) Add 10% limonene and shake

4) Let separate. Remove limonene (collect in a sealed container)

5) Repeat steps 4 and 5 several times (throw away liquid)

6) Allow some limonene to evaporate, add a small amount of acidified water to remainder and shake.

7) Pour into saucer, Let mix separate and allow limonene to completely evaporate.

8) Add VG to WTA/water concentrate and mix

9) vape.

I don't have a clue if this would work and do not recommend anyone try it. I am attempting the lighter fluid method - but that is purely out of curiosity and I will throw it away.

Its BP is 176C so I dont see it evaporating any time soon.

I don't see the purpose of a volatile non-polar unless one wants to have undisolved alkaloids. Though there is one possible advantage (and considerable hazard). I think DVap's approach is something like this; it seems therefore that the alkaloids are sufficently miscible in water / VG to remain in their freebase form. Either as freebase or salts, they likely are carried out of the atomiser. Absorption rate is likely faster with freebase alkaloids.
 

slopes

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 19, 2009
616
210
London, UK
Its BP is 176C so I dont see it evaporating any time soon.

I don't see the purpose of a volatile non-polar unless one wants to have undisolved alkaloids. Though there is one possible advantage (and considerable hazard). I think DVap's approach is something like this; it seems therefore that the alkaloids are sufficently miscible in water / VG to remain in their freebase form. Either as freebase or salts, they likely are carried out of the atomiser. Absorption rate is likely faster with freebase alkaloids.

kinabaloo - can you help me on this? My understanding is that if a liquid is volatile it will evaporate quickly and completely at room temperature. So there will be no more of that liquid left in the resulting WTA/acidified water concentrate? Although the VG it is mixed with might end up giving a very orangey taste in this instance.
 
kinabaloo - can you help me on this? My understanding is that if a liquid is volatile it will evaporate quickly and completely at room temperature. So there will be no more of that liquid left in the resulting WTA/acidified water concentrate? Although the VG it is mixed with might end up giving a very orangey taste in this instance.

Indeed; but limonene is not volatile.
 

slopes

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 19, 2009
616
210
London, UK
How's the oilve oil one doing ?

I have my olive oil mix all ready to go. Just trying to decide what the best way forward is. Any advances on your end?

...Polmos Spirytus Rektyfikowany Vodka, 192 proof, 80% alcohol... volatile?

EDIT : Spirytus Delikatesowy Vodka... 95%?
 
Last edited:
I have my olive oil mix all ready to go. Just trying to decide what the best way forward is. Any advances on your end?

...Polmos Spirytus Rektyfikowany Vodka, 192 proof, 80% alcohol... volatile?

Ethanol is only slightly volatile. And miscible with water !

Just theorising today ...
 
4 ml is not too unreasonable a volume.

But the yield is not the volume of course. It's what's in there ...

If you got 50% of the alkaloids that would be ~0.75% x 20,000mg = ~15mg so ~ 4mg / ml (oil stage)

So you'd need to use as little acidic water as possible - say 0.5 ml

Then after adding VG would be ~7.5mg / ml

Doesn't sound much, but WTA is said pretty powerful, and can be mixed with high nic juice.
 
Last edited:

slopes

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 19, 2009
616
210
London, UK
But how would I separate 0.5ml acidic water off?

Actually one workable method of separation I have discovered is to draw up a dirty oil/water potion into a dropper, let it separate in there and then take off the whichever part you want. The separation takes place quite quickly, but you can only do small amounts each time, of course.
 
Last edited:
But how would I separate 0.5ml acidic water off?

Actually one workable method of separation I have discovered is to draw up a dirty oil/water potion into a dropper, let it separate in there and then take of the whichever part you want. The separation takes place quite quickly, but you can only do small amounts each time, of course.

Very good tip.

Otherwise a tall slim (narrow) clear container - such that it would hardy stand up. Or something like a pipette.

For mortals, your idea is likely as good as it gets.

~~

ps - how dark is the separated mineral oil ?
 

tescela

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 28, 2009
536
5
Slopes... if you aren't willing to drink/eat it... then why would you consider using it to make something vapable?
My intention was to use only food grade materials at ALL steps in the process, and to never have a nicotine concentration that is hazardous. If you want to try alternative non-polar solvents etc., there are lots of options. None will be found in the kitchen though.

To each his own, but I wouldn't endorse it. While I've only a rudimentary understanding of the chemistry involved, it's not something I would ever try.

Good thinking, tceight!

Kinabaloo and slopes: This thread suddenly exploded (which is excellent! :) ), and I've skimmed almost 30 pages of posts today...and still cannot tell if either of you have succeeded in producing "tceight/Dvap-potency" WTA eliquid in the last five days. Am I missing something, or are you trying to torture us with suspense?
 
Good thinking, tceight!

Kinabaloo and slopes: This thread suddenly exploded (which is excellent! :) ), and I've skimmed almost 30 pages of posts today...and still cannot tell if either of you have succeeded in producing "tceight/Dvap-potency" WTA eliquid in the last five days. Am I missing something, or are you trying to torture us with suspense?

tescela - on my part, i feel i want to hone the procedure some more. But tceight's method does work and others can follow it as is.

slopes - read your mail; thinking about it ...
 

Hotwire

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2010
1,890
909
England
Guys I am not pharmacutically inclined nor skilled but am following this thread like a hawk and awaiting the day I can try a vape of some potent wta juice!!!

If you guys keep this up and discover a method of mass reproducing tceght / dvaps results - you will be mavericks and it could well be massive for those of us that feel we want something in the middle of cigs and current nic only e-juices!
 
Guys I am not pharmacutically inclined nor skilled but am following this thread like a hawk and awaiting the day I can try a vape of some potent wta juice!!!

If you guys keep this up and discover a method of mass reproducing tceght / dvaps results - you will be mavericks and it could well be massive for those of us that feel we want something in the middle of cigs and current nic only e-juices!

Actually it would be quite easy to do on a commercial scale, technically speaking. An efficient and easy to do home method is not so straightforward; but we're getting there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread