Wow.
Someone should've told Lorillard they may have overpaid for Blu by...134 million? Not the brightest transfer of all time on Lorillard's part, lol.
I have mixed feelings about seeing this. For ages there's been a large consensus amongst vapers that the Blu - relative to other e-cigs - sucks quite badly.
(And I'm being kind putting it that way, lol.) But on the other hand, the Blu
is a means by which people can at least be introduced to the concept of vaping. Yes, it may have very short battery life & low voltage...but you
can vape with it. I also remember being
wowed by the Joye 510 when I was a newbie...which as we all know, has a fairly short battery life & low voltage. So I have to concede...maybe the Blu will be enough for
some people to start with. Don't get me wrong, I absolutely think there are far
better starting choices
(which also happen to be more affordable)...but yeah.
So does it bother me that the Blu will continue on? No. Do I have a serious concern about big tobacco's involvement? Yes and no.
Yes, in that given their track record, I don't trust them an inch; I have real concerns about proprietary changes they might make to the brands they acquire...changes to e-liquid for example, that could conceivably make the product less safe, less satisfying, more addictive, etc.
There is also a real concern that companies like Lorillard might further confuse the legal/regulatory situation in some countries by claiming their Blu products are
"tobacco products." Given that they're a tobacco company...it's not a stretch of the imagination. The problem of course, is that we all know these are
not tobacco products, as
they contain no tobacco. The inclusion of nicotine in e-liquid does
not make it a tobacco product either, even though the nicotine
is extracted from tobacco. Because
if the nic made e-liquid a tobacco product...then that would make every NRT out there a tobacco product too. And they're not
(nor are they treated as such).
The last thing we need is
any e-cig company misclassifying e-cigs or e-liquid as tobacco products.
---
Conversely...I know that the Blu sucks
(relatively speaking of course), lol. Market forces determine that sucky things don't sell well, at least not in the long term. Yeah you may sell to a few folks who didn't know any better...but they're gonna tell others, aren't they? Sooner or later, most people will realize that your product sucks. They'll google stuff, find forums like this one, vendors aplenty...and in so doing, they'll realize there are
way better products out there to choose from.
So is Lorillard going to have a piece of the vape-market pie? Yes...a very, very small piece.
Remember also that the basic, generic concept of an electronic cigarette
(battery, atomizer/cartomizer, e-liquid) is now
generic. No can lawfully say
"I've invented a new design of car...so everyone else stop making cars, period" lol. Big tobacco can acquire brand names/designs...but the point is, there's no way for them to corner the market. Which is excellent news for the e-cig industry. There are numerous designs out there...and there'll be many more in the years to come. So it's never going to be a situation where there's only
one thing to choose from, as was the case with tobacco cigarettes for decades.
One more thing. These people are
still selling tobacco cigarettes! They are still selling death in a brightly coloured box, which is completely unethical. Many will be eager to avoid giving their vape-business to them, even if the product is relatively good
(and in this particular case...it's not even that, lol).
---
In conclusion...this was an interesting development to learn about today. Thank you to
DevilFishPhil for sharing the story!
What can I say...it's something to keep our eye on, but also take with a grain of salt. The vape-industry will continue to thrive & grow, regardless of whether Lorillard has one of the very very small
(& crummier) pieces of the pie. Happy vaping &
VAPE PROUD, everyone.