It's not fluff when a product fails and causes a serious injury regardless of who is at fault but now we want a fair account of what happened so others can avoid the same situation. I would say a fire inspector assisted by someone experienced with vape technology would be the right combination. Usually the people in the firefighting business don't play games. They will want to know what happened and they will want the relevent public to know. Fire fighters spend as much time looking for risky situations as they do putting out fires. By now there may have been some articles written for firefighters about this new kind of fire risk. I'm sure there have been a few papers written about Li batteries already.
I wasn't discrediting the news article for existing at all. Indeed this is important, as the vaping community can't stand up in front of policymakers and claim safety when people are turning their vaporizers into pipe bombs.
So we are in agreement, a lack of facts doesn't help the community improve safety, which we all want. BUT, a lack of facts does actually help move the ANTZ agenda forward.
ANTZ: "See? I told you those e-cigarettes were dangerous! Kids are using them and blowing their face off!"
Public: "Oh my... what about the children? These things are dangerous! Pipe bombs ready to go off at any second!"
Community: "Wait... there are a lot of issues that could cause this, most likely stupidity, but could be a rare fluke (like cell phone batteries exploding). What was the specifics on the situation? Was he running a 0.1ohm coil on a battery he bought from China on eBay, perhaps?"
ANTZ: "We don't know, and it doesn't matter, because there's a lot we don't know, which is why we need to stop it, and stop it now."
Public: "Yes... save my child! I don't want him breathing all that vapor anyway!"