Thanks I would really appreciate it. Any other ideas on how to make it hotter besides that in case it doesn't work?
I can have the butter tested, better safe then sorry
We tested Capellas Vanilla Custard last year and found Diactyl, even though they claimed it didnt contain it.. thus I will not carry them, sorry!
If acetoin converts to minute amounts of diacetyl, as you have in the past stated it does, than many of TFA's flavors would also fall into this category yet you sell her flavorings. This really upsets me Kimberly and I will no longer be a customer of yours.
I have taken that into consideration . Its just not adding up for "me" Personally. Let me explain why "i" feel so . There has been a proven document posted as well as the owner saying it doesnt contain diacetyl . If it did theres no reason why TFA wouldn't also contain it . Has there been any documents on TFA flavors . Not that iv seen . There is also a possibility of TPA flavors using lower quality perfumer ingredients which have been posted in the past. Why was this not tested before selling if safety is a only concern ? Shouldn't there be testing on both sides . Why take the word of one and not the other ? Thats just my opinion .Ymmv . I feel these are valid points in my mind . There is not much actual testing that anything we vape is truly safe even down to the PG and VG
Also even if Kim personally thinks one flavor contains diacetyl what reason do you have for not carrying their other flavors .You dont seem to mind carrying FA . There are a bunch of FA flavors that contained diecetyl . That also makes me wonder the actual reason for not wanting to carry capellas. Saying you dont want to carry Capellas is fine but saying it because they are unsafe and contain diacetyl "i" don't think is a accurate reason and defamatory to their company.
All i personally go off of is documents and speculations however im not speculating the documents nor am i documenting the speculations until the speculations become documents .
These are just my opinions as said above << .Its fine to think differently but im just stating what "i" think
“Good evening, Kimberly. Your check arrived today and thank you. Diacetyl, 2,3-Pentanedione, and Acetoin are all present in the Vanilla Custard sample that you sent. Just a very small amount of diacetyl, however. Let me know if you need anything else. “
For the safety of my customers, that was the end of my Capella’s interest. I was not interested in paying hundreds of dollars to get the exact recipe or the report showing its contents because it was more a test of interest. If it had not contained diactyl, I would have considered carrying their products.
I emailed the ABC company that did the report posted in this thread asking if their response of ND<.04% meant there was no Diacetyl present and I got this response:
"If it is not detected, reported as ND <0.04%, it means if there is any, it is <0.04%. You used ">" sign. Which is not typical. You have to confirm with the lab who send the report. Are you reading a ABC Testing ,Inc. issued report?
Thanks
<name omitted>
ABC Testing ,Inc."
Obviously I got the sign turned the wrong way in my email hehe but note she said “If there is any", that means its less then .04%. She did not yet state to me there is none, nor referenced any tolerance levels. Hopefully I will get more information which I will share when she responds.