I think you might be getting a little too far ahead. At this point we haven't decided what exactly the board positions will entail and not all the nominees may accept their nomination or be qualified.
And regarding people's positions on issues, it might be interesting to know but it hopefully will not make a large difference since I think major policy stances for the organization will be made by a collective vote. That said, what are the questions you would like answered?
The key thing is whether the FDA are right to insist that e-cigs are a drug-delivery device.
It feels more and more like there is an inner-circle of kings and then the rest of us, who are just supposed to pay up and nod our heads.