China Court Upholds Ruyan Patent on E-Cigs–Orders Others to Destroy Inventory

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sun Vaporer

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jan 2, 2009
10,146
27
Florida
As Reported here:
"In a decision rendered by a court in the People's Republic of China in January of 2009, Ruyan prevailed in a lawsuit against e-Cig, a China-based illicit manufacturer of electronic cigarettes and accessories. As a result of the decision, e-Cig was required to pay compensation to Ruyan for damages, destroy all of its existing stock of inventory and agree to never engage in the electronic cigarette business again. The ruling was the first of what Ruyan expects to be a series of such decisions as it has initiated similar actions against other illegal China-based manufacturers.
I begs the question, will Ryan, with its other court decision pending, try to take over control of the majority of e-cigs distibuted and will this cause a monopoly and a bottleneck in supply? Time will only tell, but from this report, Ryan is in fact trying to take hold of the total market share.
Further noted is the studies that have been conducted on the safety of Ryan’s E-Cig as;

"Over the last four years, several respected independent research institutions have conducted reviews of Ruyan electronic cigarette products, including The Institute of Radiology & Radiation Medicine of the Academy of Military Medical Science of China; The Tianjin Center for Disease Control & Prevention, The Chinese Center for Disease Control & Prevention, and Health New Zealand Ltd. In addition to these safety tests, BJ SBT has conducted over 40 product and components tests with an accredited PONY laboratory for every component used in Ruyan products."-- Sun
See-- http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayR...STORY=/www/story/02-23-2009/0004976920&EDATE=
 
Last edited:

SupplierX

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Dec 5, 2008
209
2
Ohio USA
www.VaprEcig.com
Everyone needs to relax. Here is the link to e-cigchina:
EcigChina.Com,Fuyan,Ruyan,Electronic Cigarette,E-Cigarette,China Wholesale Retail, dropship - Catalog

If you notice the only product that has been removed is the penstyle. Ruyan hold a patent for this variety of e-cig. Not to mention, before this ruling they were involking the name "Ruyan" on their site.
So if you are an e-cigar or penstyle user you might have a little to worry about, but not really.

Notice the use of the word "Ruyan" in the link
 
Everyone needs to relax. Here is the link to e-cigchina:
EcigChina.Com,Fuyan,Ruyan,Electronic Cigarette,E-Cigarette,China Wholesale Retail, dropship - Catalog

If you notice the only product that has been removed is the penstyle. Ruyan hold a patent for this variety of e-cig. Not to mention, before this ruling they were involking the name "Ruyan" on their site.
So if you are an e-cigar or penstyle user you might have a little to worry about, but not really.

Notice the use of the word "Ruyan" in the link

I hope you're right, because if they are allowed a monopoly on E-cigs we'll all be in deep doo-doo.

I did notice that the v9 look alike and the e-cigar are both removed from their site, but other products are still available. *crosses fingers and hopes for the best*
 

Sun Vaporer

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jan 2, 2009
10,146
27
Florida
Everyone needs to relax. Here is the link to e-cigchina:
EcigChina.Com,Fuyan,Ruyan,Electronic Cigarette,E-Cigarette,China Wholesale Retail, dropship - Catalog

If you notice the only product that has been removed is the penstyle. Ruyan hold a patent for this variety of e-cig. Not to mention, before this ruling they were involking the name "Ruyan" on their site.
So if you are an e-cigar or penstyle user you might have a little to worry about, but not really.

Notice the use of the word "Ruyan" in the link

Taley--That is not what I have been reading at all. Ryan claims, and the court agreed that the atomization processs is theirs and there are many other patent infrigment cases it is pursuing-- I have read the full opinion of the China Court translated and the court clearly states that it is the process and not the design of the atomizer that Ryan owns--not the style---so IMO they are going after those that infringe on their process--and the Court agreed--Sun
 

SupplierX

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Dec 5, 2008
209
2
Ohio USA
www.VaprEcig.com
You cannot patent a concept. Look at the Mp3 player. The concept is the same, a portable device that plays music files, but all of the designs are different. All that is required is a slight design modification, otherwise there would be no reason for patents to be made public. Read the US constitution regarding patent law, the purpose of patents is to drive innovation. Patents are made public for the sole purpose of driving inventors to improve on allready existing technology. Now, if you own multiple e-cigs, you will see that the atomizers are all slightly different from one another. I know that what I have just said will be picked apart, but the reality is the only ones that need to worry is the suppliers.
 
Last edited:

Sun Vaporer

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jan 2, 2009
10,146
27
Florida
You cannot patent a concept. Look at the Mp3 player. The concept is the same, a portable device that plays music files, but all of the designs are different.

Taley--what is at issue here goes to method and design--not "concept" The court noted that the atomizer heating the liquid in the cartridge was in fact a property right held by and owned by Ryan. That is what Intellectual Property Law is all about--Sun
 

RjG

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 16, 2008
630
42
57
Edmonton AB Canada

As Reported here:
"In a decision rendered by a court in the People's Republic of China in January of 2009, Ruyan prevailed in a lawsuit against e-Cig, a China-based illicit manufacturer of electronic cigarettes and accessories. As a result of the decision, e-Cig...

I'm confused...
They won a lawsuit against ecigchina.com, or E-Cig.com?
The article just states e-Cig (Cixi E-CIG?)

But the link just posted from taleywhacker, ecigChina.com (EcigChina International Co) - I've seen that place before, lots of Ruyan BRANDED stuff for cheap.
They even state "full range of patented ORIGINAL RUYAN products"
Now if thats all FAKE knockoffs of Ruyan products - with Ruyan branding - well this all makes much more sense now.

Does anyone have more info than the single article quoted?
 

Sun Vaporer

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jan 2, 2009
10,146
27
Florida
Well then I guess we are screwed. Not really any point in arguing. Everyone knows it all.

Taley--not at all-just reporting what the Court held. I hope they find away around it --maybe manufacture in another Country that does not reckonize China Law--who knows. All I know is every day there is more bad news on the door step about our devices--the one good point of this story is the Saftey reports that Ryan has done--I thought there was only one, but as reported here there are several and they are on going--So this means more of ammo with the FDA--maybe--a big maybe--Sun
 

Sun Vaporer

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jan 2, 2009
10,146
27
Florida
I'm confused...
They won a lawsuit against ecigchina.com, or E-Cig.com?
The article just states e-Cig (Cixi E-CIG?)

But the link just posted from taleywhacker, ecigChina.com (EcigChina International Co) - I've seen that place before, lots of Ruyan BRANDED stuff for cheap.
They even state "full range of patented ORIGINAL RUYAN products"
Now if thats all FAKE knockoffs of Ruyan products - with Ruyan branding - well this all makes much more sense now.

Does anyone have more info than the single article quoted?

RJG--- This is the first report out of the High Court in China and it make it very clear that they are going to uphold Ruyan's claim that they invented the atomization method used in all atomizers and that anyone else that tries to infinge upon that ownership right will be shut down and pay damages to Ruyan. The burden is always on Ruyan to file suit against anyone infringing on their now enumerated right of ownership--and as the article notes--Ruyan has many suits in the Courts--this is just the first one that the Court actually comes out and clearly states that Ruyan owns the atomization method used in e-cigs--Sun
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread