Cloud9vaping pulls Five Pawns and other liquids from the shelf after testing.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pinggolfer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2013
6,890
18,792
The Clemson Tigers State
Where have I ever said cigarettes are a safer choice?? I think vaping is far, far safer regardless of what your juice choice is. I have no idea what your chances of lung cancer from vaping 5P is, I have no idea what my chances of lung cancer from vaping are - I have no problem with you vaping 5P, I have no problem with anyone vaping FP.

And adding ammunition for ANTZ to use is fine in your book?

The co-president of the Southern California chapter of a lobbying group, comes out on the side of one of its member vendors from Southern California.

Totally BS and you know it. It's to protect vapers right to vape. Northern CA has it's own chapter.
 

kates

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 20, 2014
504
2,295
United Kingdom
And adding ammunition for ANTZ to use is fine in your book?
No it isn't - but neither is pretending that this issue isn't already out there and our response isn't important. Not adding ammunition to ANTZ doesn't mean we ignore issues that matter to a great number of the vaping community and is based on information that is out there in the public domain for anyone to see. Sit down, shut up and stick your head in the sand isn't the answer for me. We need to tackle it by being open, transparent - not by sitting on results for 9 months whilst at the same time saying they are something else.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,618
1
84,741
So-Cal
So what Retailers ( or Individuals ) have sent samples of Five Pawns to an Independent Lab to be Tested?

I have One set of result from Five Pawns that aren't Very Encouraging. And I have Another Set of results from someone who was Selling Five Pawns and those Results are a Train Wreck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thundernoggin

peraspera

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 2, 2012
2,808
6,184
midwest
It's to protect vapers right to vape.

One of the senior officers of a large trade group makes a public statement that makes the industry look like it is made up of unruly teenagers living in mommy's basement who are too incompetent to come up with their own industry standards for testing for potential harmful chemicals in the product they sell. This is apparently because they are far too busy getting into public feuds over thieving one another's intellectual property and labelling their juice with cartoon characters.

Let me take a wild guess that no professional PR person nor lobbyist approved this blather. Mr. Burton can certainly lay claim to having mastered the fine art of delivering free ammo to the enemy.

I'll take a full pass on Mr. Burton "defending" my right to vape.
 
Last edited:

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,618
1
84,741
So-Cal
...


Currently, there is no standardized test for diacetyl and some other hazardous substances; there are in fact several methods that may have varying results when compared side by side. In most industries, when a product comes back from initial testing with negative results, the manufacturer will have a second independent lab do another round of testing to confirm the negative results. Should that lab also have negative results, the company would take appropriate action. Should the results come back positive, the company and the two labs would work together to figure out why there was a variance and possibly a third independent lab would be brought in for additional testing. Without an industry agreed upon standardized test, it is premature to announce that a company’s E-liquids are hazardous without further examination by a second independent lab.

...

It would seem to me that if Five Pawns believes that the Results from the Lab Cloud9 used were in error, that they would be Encouraging their retailers to send out Samples for Independent Lab Testing.

Has this Occurred?

BTW - If there is Supposedly "no standardized test for diacetyl and some other hazardous substances", why would I put Any Faith in the Test Results that Five Pawns did on their e-Liquids back in 2014? Using the Lab that they Hand Picked.
 

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,232
SE PA
And adding ammunition for ANTZ to use is fine in your book?
I'll tell you what adds ammunition for ANTZ to use: When a major (and formerly highly respected) juice manufacturer has their juice tested themselves, finds very high levels of diketones, buries the results for a year, changes nothing, and lies to consumers about it the whole time by denying that there are diketones in their product. Questioning whether diketones might be harmful, stating that one wishes to to avoid them, and insisting that manufacturers should tell the truth when asked a direct question doesn't.
 

Racehorse

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 12, 2012
11,230
28,254
USA midwest
What about a vapers right to know what they vape?

It would seem to me that if Five Pawns believes that the Results from the Lab Cloud9 used were in error, that they would be Encouraging their retailers to send out Samples for Independent Lab Testing.

Here's the new paradigm:

1) Testing from big government-affiliated laboratories are unacceptable to vapers.

2) Testing from pretty much any other laboratory, Ethalpy, etc., will be found in error by any eliquid manufacturer who doesn't like their test results, and those labs will be subject to legal action.

So I guess the answer to Nomoreach's question is: see above. :)
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,618
1
84,741
So-Cal
I'll tell you what adds ammunition for ANTZ to use: When a major (and formerly highly respected) juice manufacturer has their juice tested themselves, finds very high levels of diketones, buries the results for a year, changes nothing, and lies to consumers about it the whole time by denying that there are diketones in their product. Questioning whether diketones might be harmful, stating that one wishes to to avoid them, and insisting that manufacturers should tell the truth when asked a direct question doesn't.

I think you Pretty Much Nailed it Rossum.

:thumb:
 

Racehorse

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 12, 2012
11,230
28,254
USA midwest
Do you Know if there is a List anywhere of such Flavors that are Diacetyl and Acetylpropionyl free?

Every day, vendors across the U.S., but moreso in the UK and CAN, have test results posted right on the page when you click on ejuice to buy.
Pretty soon, lists will not be necessary.
As of right now, vaporshark carries about a dozen eliquid brands, and each one has a test result attached.

Shopping will be getting easier soon.

Companies like Generals in UK, and Totally Wicked, will probably have results up by end of week, etc.

This is the way going forward.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,618
1
84,741
So-Cal
Here's the new paradigm:

1) Testing from big government-affiliated laboratories are unacceptable to vapers.

2) Testing from pretty much any other laboratory, Ethalpy, etc., will be found in error by any eliquid manufacturer who doesn't like their test results, and those labs will be subject to legal action.

So I guess the answer to Nomoreach's question is: see above. :)

Yeah... The Only Lab Results we should Trust are those that Five Pawns did back in 2014.

Randomized Testing using an Independent Certified Laboratories that have No Monetary Ties to the Product being tested Doesn't sound like a very Sound approach.
 

Racehorse

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 12, 2012
11,230
28,254
USA midwest

sd3614

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 7, 2015
847
750
MIDWEST USA
There are a lot of e-liquid vendors on this very site that if tested could be the same if not worse. The whole thing seems sketchy and Grey.

Good news, the more this is pumped up the sooner we can get more regulation from the Gov and states. Better yet, end up smoking cigs again because it gets banned or buy all of our juice from RJ Reynolds. So of the BEST ways government or Big tobacco can be affective is through social decay from the inside out. Some people..just paid to sit around and turn firewood into burning cities so they can save us from ourselves.

Grass roots becomes mainstream becomes regulated and then new grass roots of something else will start all over. I'm just middle of the road on all of this, but I respect everyone's rights to know, but I can't help think many who are "shocked" are still vaping on crap in their stash they have no clue about on testing. I have a closet of Madtownvap, Cuttwood, Sirius Vapors, Rocky Mountain, Casey Jones, Red Rock. All purchased based on the fact that I wanted to quite smoking and that it is probably is better for me than cigs. That was it, no real data or proof.

I can kill my liver on prescription meds and alcohol, skin cancer from tanning (not that I tan, I wish I could) and the list goes on. I have no doubt everyone is fudging something on ingredients. I guess we need the FDA...
 
Last edited:

Racehorse

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 12, 2012
11,230
28,254
USA midwest

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,232
SE PA
Every day, vendors across the U.S., but moreso in the UK and CAN, have test results posted right on the page when you click on ejuice to buy.
Pretty soon, lists will not be necessary.
As of right now, vaporshark carries about a dozen eliquid brands, and each one has a test result attached.

Shopping will be getting easier soon.

Companies like Generals in UK, and Totally Wicked, will probably have results up by end of week, etc.

This is the way going forward.
That would be excellent.

Vendors who sell a lot of DIY flavors should do the same for those flavors, particularly if the flavor manufacturer won't provide a certificate of analysis.
 

Racehorse

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 12, 2012
11,230
28,254
USA midwest
There are a lot of e-liquid vendors on this very site that if tested could be the same if not worse.

Of course. That is why vapers who wish to vape DAP-free are looking to purchase from companies with published test results. Something we have been waiting for for a long time, and which is finally coming to fruition.

Consumers who wish to vape DAP eliquids can continue to vape them, either by looking for DAP in the test results, or by purchasing from vendors who do not provide tests.

There is something for everyone.

the more this is pumped up the sooner we can get more regulation from the Gov and states.

Not at all. It's not like the regulators don't know about diketones. The vaping industry, if it polices itself, will make that an non-issue. They will have tests to show. That is why the big names in the UK, and many in the U.S. like MOV, started getting ahead of the curve quite some time ago.....they will be in business when and if the regulators start hassling them.

As an example: I work in dog and horse rescue as a volunteer, this attitude of "whispering" about abuses has done untold damage and brought unspeakable suffering to the animals when people who "don't get it" would suggest not exposing what was going on, lest PETA got hold of the information.

thankfully, there are still people in the rescue community who will turn in the abusers, and litigate against them if necessary and even though we hate PETA we really do not care what they "make of it." We are trying to save lives and end suffering, and those who do not follow correct practices in caring for dogs and horses will be called up and called out.

those who want to sweep things under the rug because of fears of "who might get hold of the info" are not helping at all.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread