There very well could've been other factors. For all we know her 21 year old boyfriend bought it for her. But that is what we had to get to the bottom of.
As you state these problem do happen in everyday life, with everyday products. Minors get served at bars. But that too is also a half truth. Bars also get shut down under the Liquor Act for serving minors.. that's the rest of the story. In our case we have Health Canada, who isn't a friend to us, and has the power to do a lot of damage.
This is the type of situation you defuse through moderation, rather than stating what she already knows, and finds unacceptable. She came to try and find resolution, not confrontation and denial.
Again "this happens in everyday life" so what.. Isn't the position of the ECTA on the matter of underage sales, so the comment was removed.
Fine and dandy that the comment was removed (albeit a valid point to the subject), but why was a member booted out of the "community" (I use that term loosely as to remain civil) for a comment that "someone" deemed that they did not like when it was state that it is a valid point.
The OP was not there seeking guidance to the situation, she was there to inform of said transpirings. Since it was merely a post of information, should not all view points of the subject be taken into consideration and general conversation be allowed? Instead censorship is taking place and not all view points are being heard.
Upon any discussion all view points should be heard and considered. This is the point of open discussion (even if it is taking place in a closed group).
Health Canada would have no jurisdiction on this matter. Much the same as they would have no say in the matter of a bar serving a minor.
The issue at hand is an open discussion on the matter was silenced and not allowed to continue due to someone within the group deciding that they would silence one persons voice. If a group which is trying to stand for the best interests of Canadians starts to silence its members, how can you call yourselves any different than an organization like Health Canada?
The people to which you are representing should have a free and clear voice to state their opinions and contribute to any subject.