I am afraid one or two lab tests aren't enough to prove that under all vaping circumstances there is no acrolyn produced.....people are using higher voltage batteries...changing temperatures ....there are so many variables....to decide that a couple of reports makes you certain that there is no chance of acrolyn being produced (because the reports were done by cleverer people than us) seems a bit naive to me. Still no one is saying it's at a dangerous level...we wouldn't be vaping it if we believed that.
The personal jibes from a couple of members (not you Pete) are like water off a duck's back to someone who grew up where I did and who attended the school of hard knocks. Calm your skin.
I never made any claim that the tests offered definitive proof, but merely pointed out that they should not be easily discounted for obvious reasons.
I know now what I am dealing with so I will leave the thread to their devices.
Although further tests are required, it would appear on available evidence that acrolein presents a minimal risk if any at all.
Some research indicates that acrolein could have cancer inhibiting properties, that's a new slant on the 'bad boy'.
See:
Isophosphamide as a New Acrolein-producing Antineoplastic Isomer of Cyclophosphamide
"Isophosphamide, a new experimentally effective antitumor
agent, generates the cytotoxic aldehyde acrolein during its in
vitro oxidative degradation by either liver microsomes or
chemicals. The patterns of formation of acrolein by hepatic
microsomal preparations from isophosphamide and from
cyclophosphamide are similar, although larger amounts of
acrolein are obtained from the latter. As most of the biological
activation of cyclophosphamide takes place in the liver
microsomes, it is suggested that acrolein might participate in
the antitumor effects of these two drugs."
Now that some progress has been made on the acrolein front, what about the other properties of Humectants? PG VG PEG SEG, are they really safe or could we be at risk of them contributing to any of the following?
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
pneumonia;
asthma;
bronchiolitis;
upper respiratory tract infections.
other acute respiratory tract infections;
Pneumoconiosis and Silicosis
Allergic rhinitis
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Bronchitis
Influenza
Pneumonia
Emphysema
Sarcoidosis
Pleurisy
Lung Cancer
The first paragraph below illustrates how one school of thought thinks that VG is okay when used as a humectant in skin care products, but further evidence contradicts that.
"However, regardless of their ability to moisturize, some humectants are harsh industrial chemicals not suitable for natural skin care. Propylene glycol, for example, is used in anti-freeze, brake fluid, paint and floor wax. It is also used in cosmetics and lotions because of its humectant properties - it enhances absorption of moisture and also facilitates the absorption into the skin of the other ingredients. However, propylene oxide, of which propylene glycol is a derivative, is known to actually cause eczema, rashes and dry skin and is classified as a carcinogen in EPAs Toxic Release Inventory. Per the EPA, if it is inhaled or ingested, or makes eye or skin contact, it can irritate the eyes, upper respiratory system, lungs, and skin.
When choosing skin care products, you should always ensure that humectants are in the ingredients. However, make sure to stay away from propylene glycol. Instead, choose products with vegetable glycerin, vitamin E, panthenol (a form of pantothenic acid - Vitamin B5), collagen and elastin. These humectants are safe and natural and provide the dry skin care you need without causing further damage."
"Propylene Glycol: The most common humectant and carrying-chemical in cosmetics. It is a very inexpensive neurotoxic petrochemical mix. It is also used in antifreeze, airplane deicers, hydraulic brake fluid, varnish, and pet food. It has a small molecular weight, and therefore easily penetrates the skin. It accumulates in the heart, liver, and kidneys (where it can cause damage.) Propylene Glycol can depress the Central Nervous System, cause gastrointestinal disturbance, and induce nausea. It weakens the immune system and cellular structure. The MSDS on this chemical warns to avoid contact with eyes and skin, and suggests the use of safety goggles and other protective gear. Commonly found in deodorants, this substance may be contaminated with 1,4 dioxane.
PEG (Polyethylene Glycol): A petroleum based softener and binder that is widely used in cosmetics. A known irritant and potentially toxic if too much is absorbed into the body."
From:
Health Essentials - Myths
MYTH #2: GLYCERIN A beneficial humectant.
Glycerin is a clear, syrupy liquid used in almost all soaps and lotions (even the "natural" ones), and has many other uses. It's made by chemically combining water and fat. The water splits the fat into smaller components: glycerol and fatty acids. It improves the spreading qualities of creams and lotions, and prevents them from losing water through evaporation.
A solvent, humectant and emollient used in many cosmetics, glycerin absorbs moisture from the air, helping to keep moisture in creams and other products, even if the consumer leaves the cap off the container (Winter).
That sounds fine; however, glycerin also has a tendency to draw water out of the skin (see more at Myth #3). Unless the humidity of the air is over 65%, glycerin will pull the moisture out of the skin, drying you from the inside out (Chase).
MYTH #3: HUMECTANTS Beneficial for drawing moisture to, and aiding in the moisturizing of, the skin.
Most moisturizers contain humectants. These are compounds that act as water attractors. In either a natural or synthetic form, they are used to prevent water loss and drying of the skin, as well as to preserve the moisture content of materials, especially in hand creams and lotions (Winter), giving them a smooth texture.
However, while touted as great moisturizing agents because of their ability to draw moisture out of the air, often they're actually pulling moisture out of your skin (Valmy).
Here's why: Humectants are in search of moisture. If that moisture can be absorbed from the environment, fine; but if the environment is too dry, and there is no environmental moisture to be had, a humectant will get it from the next best source your skin.
This means that humectants, including propylene glycol and glycerin, while apparently effective when used in areas with high humidity will, if used in an extremely low humidity atmosphere (defined as below 65%) such as in an airplane or even a dry room can actually take moisture from your skin. And so, the ingredient used to help your skin remain moist is actually doing the opposite (Brumberg).
MYTH #11: PROPYLENE GLYCOL (PG) A beneficial humectant.
Propylene glycol is a moisturizer, the most common moisture-carrying vehicle, other than water, in cosmetics. It has better permeation through the skin than glycerin, and is less expensive. However, it has been shown to provoke acne eruptions (Chase), and been linked to other sensitivity reactions. Its use is being reduced, and is being replaced by safer glycols (Winter).
The Material Safety Data Sheet, Propylene Glycol USP, shows: "over-exposure to this material (or its components) has apparently been found to cause the following effects in laboratory animals: liver abnormality and kidney damage." (ARCO Chemical Company).
And finally:
Humectant additive
Let the debate expand.
Alan.