DNA 200 Watt

Status
Not open for further replies.

Darkly spectr

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 9, 2014
468
285
37
Belgium
LiFes are a very safe technology, so that's not an issue at all. And they can support a high discharge rate also. The issue for them is the full charge voltage is only 3.6v/cell (LiPos are 4.2v/cell). So if the DNA200 uses a conservative low voltage cutoff of 3.2v (I'm not sure what the LVC for the DNA200 is) it might not be able to use all it's available power. It is common to have a cutoff or 3.1 or 3.2v, so that really is going to be an important factor for how well LiFes do with this chip. Couple the LVC with the discharge curve of a LiFe cell, which starts out at 3.6v and drops pretty quickly to 3.2v where it stays for most of it's usable charge life and I'm just not sure it's going to perform well.

It's yet to be seen what the LVC of the DNA200 is, and that is probably the biggest concern I have with LiFe batteries with this chip. Maybe someone can chime that knows what the cutoff will be, and if it's settable in the software. LVC being settable to take advantage of LiFe battery technology, that differs quite a bit from LiPos, will be the deciding factor in how this battery tech will work I think. LiFes are designed to spend most of their time at 3.2v during a discharge cycle, so it's important the DNA200 can take advantage of this for LiFes to be viable. And even if the LVC cutoff is 3.1v, a nominal voltage of 3.2v on LiFes is going to trigger a LVC on the chip with normal voltage sag if vaping at high wattage, even though the LiFe pack is operating normally and within spec.

Just too early to say without knowing the complete specs of the DNA200, and seeing how much voltage drop occurs on a LiFe pack at high wattage vaping. I wouldn't be concerned at all about the LiFe pack being capable of doing the job, I just don't know If the DNA200 is smart enough to be able to use this different battery tech properly or if it just treats a LiFe pack as a LiPo pack... which would not be ideal.
Well in a way I guess with the escribe maybe there is a way to set a different voltage cut-off depending on battery?

well stealthvape shipped out my box and chip already.
 

mikepetro

Vape Geek
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 22, 2013
10,224
81,686
67
Newport News, Virginia, United States
Well in a way I guess with the escribe maybe there is a way to set a different voltage cut-off depending on battery?
Yes, it is selectable, and the LVC etc change based on selection of LIPO, LiFe PO4, or Power Supply.
 

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
Last edited:

Troll from behind

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 2, 2012
643
629
49
Finlad
Oh my, you can go up to 50 watts with .04 build!!
What the heck is the frothing about "legit" 200 watts, don't we have chips that can go there (and above) with higher resistances?
For me the "legit" would be something, that can go up to promised through the entire resistance scale.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

Shogun1024

Senior Vapaholic
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 6, 2011
183
214
Charlotte
Oh my, you can go up to 50 watts with .4 build!!
What the heck is the frothing about "legit" 200 watts, don't we have chips that can go there (and above) with higher resistances?
For me the "legit" would be something, that can go up to promised through the entire resistance scale.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Um..... Believe that is 50 watts at 0.04
 

Shogun1024

Senior Vapaholic
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 6, 2011
183
214
Charlotte
Correct, .04 ohms

I can't wait to learn about the hybrid builds.


Sent from my iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

I'm running a hybrid 28ga Titanium/Kanthal twisted with 38ga Clapton right now. Using the SXK vapor flask the TC is working great, BUT the possibilities are virtually endless come the DNA200. So excited personally and I haven't had an Evolv chip since the Darwin
 

Sptz

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
I'm running a hybrid 28ga Titanium/Kanthal twisted with 38ga Clapton right now. Using the SXK vapor flask the TC is working great, BUT the possibilities are virtually endless come the DNA200. So excited personally and I haven't had an Evolv chip since the Darwin

Why would that be? Why would the DNA200 offer more options for hybrid builds than a sx350j or dna40? More so the 350j after the Ti FW update.
 

VapingBad

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 16, 2015
422
2,586
Hertfordshire, UK
Why would that be? Why would the DNA200 offer more options for hybrid builds than a sx350j or dna40? More so the 350j after the Ti FW update.
You can load your own TCR curves for any wire, SteamEngine have a beta page for them to. And temperature controlled pre heat which the YiHi doesn't have will make a big difference for more mass-ive coils.
 

Shogun1024

Senior Vapaholic
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 6, 2011
183
214
Charlotte
You can load your own TCR curves for any wire, SteamEngine have a beta page for them to. And temperature controlled pre heat which the YiHi doesn't have will make a big difference for more mass-ive coils.

MASSIVE difference really as the SXK mod with Nickel Purity can barely adjust to the coil I posted for TC and guessing the Diocedes can too since I don't have one but with 20% resistivity compared to plain Titanium being able to program your own TCR curves WILL be the next big thing ESPECIALLY with hybrid "heavy metal" builds
 

BlueridgeDog

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 20, 2014
1,181
3,944
Rocky Mount, VA, USA
I just hope that somebody designs up a chip sled/holder for the DNA 200

I have done a few, about as far as I can without the chip in hand...should have one soon. The sled design I have has been printed and I will know if it is a success shortly. My only concern at this point is window alignment and button depth.
 

Darkly spectr

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 9, 2014
468
285
37
Belgium
I have done a few, about as far as I can without the chip in hand...should have one soon. The sled design I have has been printed and I will know if it is a success shortly. My only concern at this point is window alignment and button depth.
yeah buttons and such are all no issues. I just have no idea how to get the DNA screen solid set in that hammond box. Also. not sure how I feel about the USB being onboard and not a seperate board you could move around like the DNA40. but eh I will see when I get everything together.
 

Jazzman

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 24, 2013
947
2,115
High Desert, CA
By default, the LiFe PO4 soft LVC is 2.84v, I am not sure what the Hard LVC is but it will be somewhat less.

ETA, the soft limit is configurable, albeit I am sure it limited by the HARD LVC.

That LVC makes LiFeP04 battery tech very usable with the DNA200D. Thanks for the info Mike. Every time I hear more of the little details about this board I get more excited about getting mine! This certainly seems like a really well thought out board. I hope they added drool proofing to the board so I don't ruin mine before I get the mod built :)
 

SavePaperVapor

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 5, 2009
1,741
2,162
Minnesota, USA
  • Like
Reactions: KTMRider

windxrunner

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 23, 2014
438
219
Portland, OR
I don't think LiFe's are going to be a good choice for the DNA200D unless you use a 4 cell pack. And even then, high amp draw is not a good fit for this battery tech I think. If only using between 20 and 40watts they will probably do OK, but LiPo's will do a much better job I would think. A lot depends on where the DNA200 has the low voltage cutoff (LVC) set (or if it's settable). If the LVC can be set to 3.0 or 2.9 LiFe's may not be too terrible, but if the LVC is 3.2 they won't do well at all.

You wouldn't be able to use a 4 cell LiFePO4,,,the DNA 200 has a 3 cell balancing charger. Not 1s, 2s, 4s, etc. Only 3s will work.

EDIT: So basically, if you want to use LiFePO4 cells, you're going to have to deal with a low battery warning constantly and terrible battery life. LiFePO4 cells do have a very flat discharge curve, but they do drop down to 3.3 (or 9.9 for our uses) pretty quick, where they stay for a while before going down below that. So you really wouldn't get the full mAh out of your LiFeP04 unless you could somehow tell the board that it is indeed a pack with lower operating voltage so it would know not to cut off until a lower voltage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread