By comparison...Yihi would call it a "modified bug" update....but they won't even say what the bug is... lol
By comparison...Yihi would call it a "modified bug" update....but they won't even say what the bug is... lol
Vlad your avatar trips me out. Everytime I see you post I picture your avatar puffing on a SX Mini M Class and it exploded on him and that's why he looks like he doesYour comparing what? What am I missing here?
I'm not saying a SX Mini will ever explode but for some reason that just pops up in my headVlad your avatar trips me out. Everytime I see you post I picture your avatar puffing on a SX Mini M Class and it exploded on him and that's why he looks like he doesI'm not saying a SX Mini will ever explode but for some reason that just pops up in my head
It was gruesome how Vlad the Impaler died, well depending on which story one chooses to believe. I think there are 5 to 6 variations of his death. If that is his head preserved in honey then that is pretty gruesomeI picked up Vlad as an online ID along time ago "Vlad the Impaler" Should be somewhat gruesome shouldn't he.![]()

Whoah, that is a pretty neat read, good findTemp control thread from 2009
A circuit for temperature control of the atomizer coil | E-Cigarette Forum
Temp control thread from 2009
A circuit for temperature control of the atomizer coil | E-Cigarette Forum
That is a very cool thread and those folks were thinking and designing TC 6 years ago taking into consideration all the same factors that are in play today with the current fleet of TC stuff coming out every day.Temp control thread from 2009
A circuit for temperature control of the atomizer coil | E-Cigarette Forum
Not quite all. It's a very very simplistic conceptual discussion and in the end there's a reason why it took 5 years before it actually made it into a product -- it's not anywhere near that easy.
Anyone notice the mention of self-calibration?![]()
Temp control thread from 2009
A circuit for temperature control of the atomizer coil | E-Cigarette Forum
Maybe there's a reason why it took years to make it into an e-cig product, but from the perspective of IP law that's often not relevant. For example, prior to the e-cigarette industry, there has been a lot of effort to develop electronic inhalers for the medical industry (as aerosols are a very effective method of rapid drug delivery). Such electronic inhalers described the use of positive/negative temperature coefficients in materials to control heating elements and also described the application of electronic inhalers for nicotine supplementation. If those inventions failed to develop from ideas to actual products, there can be a lot of commercial reasons for that (e.g., lack of investors, bad management) wholly apart from the merits of the ideas.
It's fairly typical to find multiple patents from different inventors describing how to solve a problem well before a commercial product is a success. Temperature control is not an exception to that, as noted by the above cited material. Evolv and other companies should be commended for their commercial success with TC-enabled e-cigerattes, but their commercial success comes well after many others have proposed ways of using the general principle of temperature control for such purposes.
Yeah and it could be a coincidence that the industry suddenly widely released TC independently exactly one cloning/reverse engineering cycle after Evolv released it.
And made it look and work just like the Evolv product, in many cases, or marketed it just like the Evolv product. Coincidentally.
Yeah and it could be a coincidence that the industry suddenly widely released TC independently exactly one cloning/reverse engineering cycle after Evolv released it.
And made it look and work just like the Evolv product, in many cases, or marketed it just like the Evolv product. Coincidentally.