... I'm not sure that e-liquids reach the temperatures (> 500 degrees F, 260 Celsius) that cigarettes burn at to produce formaldehyde.
I was wrong in that statement -
Cigarettes burn at 480°C - 752°F to 580°C - 1700°F producing the levels of formaldehyde that become a concern. Do e-cigs vaporize at a temperature high enough to produce a like amount?
The question becomes how hot is the e-cig vapor.
Glycerin's (VG and PG):
- boiling point (where liquid starts to become vapor) is 176 °C - 349 °F
- flash point (where the vapor becomes flammable if exposed to an ignition source) is 290 °C - 554 °F
- critical point (all gas and where no liquid remains) is 577 °C - 1070.6 °F.
(Information obtained from a couple of different manufacture's Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS).
It was pretty easy to test for flash point - I took a .6 ohm dripper with pure VG and without the cap, put it on a DNA mod at 20.6 watts (3.6 volts), fired it off, and placed a lit butane torch near the atomizer under the vapor - instant flame over the top of the atomizer.
At least on a .6 ohm dripper our vapor is produced at 290 °C - 554 °F or higher. How much hotter can a dripper vaporize at? Would those using .2 ohm drippers with a fresh battery that are pushing more than 80 watts - be enough to reach the threshold temperatures of a cigarette. It would be interesting to see some valid studies.
Very interesting test, but I believe that if you go too high over the flash point, you might not get ignition (really not 100% about this as it definitely depends on intrinsic properties of the liquids involved and resulting air concentration.)
The best way to check coil temperature would be with an infrared thermometer. Coils being so small, it would be more precise to use thermal imagery. Does anyone here have access to such equipment???
Also, this would be a time-curve relation as coils don't fire up at max temperature right away and many other factors also count (time on, coil gauge/resistance/size, battery voltage/capacity, watts, voltage, amps, PWM (regulation type or battery discharge curve in general), wick type and gauge, how much liquid in contact with the coil, airflow, atomizer chamber size, heat dissipation from the atomizer chamber, ambient temperature/humidity level, air pressure, etc.) Any direct temperature reading would be interesting at this point, though.
Like boiling water on a stove, once there's water in the pot, the temperature is the boiling point of water, and the energy from the fire is going into latent heat of vaporization of the water; but once the water gets all boiled off, THEN the temperature of the pot goes up rapidly.
Similarly, once the wick remains wet, the coil temperature should be at the boiling point of the liquid, but if the wick goes dry, THEN the temperature of the coil shoots up.
That's why the coil goes red only when dry.
Like boiling water on a stove, once there's water in the pot, the temperature is the boiling point of water, and the energy from the fire is going into latent heat of vaporization of the water; but once the water gets all boiled off, THEN the temperature of the pot goes up rapidly.
Similarly, once the wick remains wet, the coil temperature should be at the boiling point of the liquid, but if the wick goes dry, THEN the temperature of the coil shoots up.
That's why the coil goes red only when dry.
With the pot, water, and stove: the temp of the stove (gas flame or electric) is much higher than the boiling point of water when the water is boiling. I suspect the temp of the atomizer coil is higher than the boiling point of the eliquid. The ejuice boils furiously, and almost instantaneously.
With the pot, water, and stove: the temp of the stove (gas flame or electric) is much higher than the boiling point of water when the water is boiling. I suspect the temp of the atomizer coil is higher than the boiling point of the eliquid. The ejuice boils furiously, and almost instantaneously.
.................
As far as studies showing harmful substances in vapor, it's key that we accept them and make a point that eCigs are still way, way safer than cigarettes. Let's not pretend that vaping is harmless.
After I read about carcinogens and higher temps, I immediately reduced the wattage that I vape.
Five watts is not so bad. Been vaping 5 for a few days. Noticed juice seems to last longer too.
That's only if it is a valid peer reviewed unbiased study, unlike this one. There have been plenty of these BS studies that do not come close to real world conditions. You need to understand what is a valid, correctly crafted study (try reading the Drexel University study) and ones that are not (try reading Stan Glantz's UCF study).
The orthodox view is that any study that hints there might be something unhealthy about vaping is bogus. Studies that hint it might be benign are fine and dandy good science.
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...sion/565191-science-bogus-2.html#post13204600