dripbox
- Thread starter gertan72
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
So I can't believe I actually watched most of the second video and IMO, it fell into the same category as the first video that was posted..."WORTHLESS"... I can't believe KT would send these to "NON" BF guys to review... Why would they do that? Makes no sense to me!! Send the thing to a seasoned vet that knows what BF'g is all about. That way they will get an honest review of their product and questions answered that other BF's would or have been asking for the past week.
From what I could decipher, it is basically a cheap beater bottom feeder. The atty is just all wrong as well. It might work for some people, but not for most. If they had sent it to someone that actually knew BF's, they could've put a BF atty on it to see if it would work or not...
IMO where this thing will fail is:
Door on the bottom will get knocked off easily and lost.
Neck on the bottle itself will get stretched out and not fit properly and will lose the ability to squonk and will leak.
Feed tube will break off of 510 from bottle going up and down so many times.
Battery venting and no way to get it out quickly and bad things happen...
Liquid leaking from the atty, (over squonking), down into the switch and killing it.
From what I could decipher, it is basically a cheap beater bottom feeder. The atty is just all wrong as well. It might work for some people, but not for most. If they had sent it to someone that actually knew BF's, they could've put a BF atty on it to see if it would work or not...
IMO where this thing will fail is:
Door on the bottom will get knocked off easily and lost.
Neck on the bottle itself will get stretched out and not fit properly and will lose the ability to squonk and will leak.
Feed tube will break off of 510 from bottle going up and down so many times.
Battery venting and no way to get it out quickly and bad things happen...
Liquid leaking from the atty, (over squonking), down into the switch and killing it.
Looking forward to this review. Hopefully he will post one soon...
Pbusardo...
http://www.tasteyourjuice.com/wordpress/archives/10346
Pbusardo...
http://www.tasteyourjuice.com/wordpress/archives/10346
Considering how this atty squonks and how high the airflow is, you would probably have to squonk half the bottle empty before that happens.
I think this is a great idea minus the "replaceable coils" and how the tube+bottle is set up. If I didn't already have a squonker and was interested in squonking then I would absolutely try this out.
Its interesting to see Kanger come out with a rebuildable squonking atty. Hopefully we'll see the other big ecig players come out with their own RDA's and rebuildable squonkers in the future.
Um. All other minor concerns and guesses aside - it would have been nice, being a squonker, if it actually SQUONKED.
From both videos, it clearly does not.
You squeeze and wait, and squeeze harder, and eventually, maybe, your coil gets damp.
That is, by definition, not a squonk.
Look it up, people! Squonking requires enough juice be flowin' to make a SOUND when returning from whence it came. It's an onomatopoeia dammit!
From both videos, it clearly does not.
You squeeze and wait, and squeeze harder, and eventually, maybe, your coil gets damp.
That is, by definition, not a squonk.
Look it up, people! Squonking requires enough juice be flowin' to make a SOUND when returning from whence it came. It's an onomatopoeia dammit!
The day when an affordable regulated VW squonker comes out is the day I'll quit meat.
Jkjkjk I love my steaks too much
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jkjkjk I love my steaks too much
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In the immortal words of Ross Perot "we want to hear the giant sucking sound!"Um. All other minor concerns and guesses aside - it would have been nice, being a squonker, if it actually SQUONKED.
From both videos, it clearly does not.
You squeeze and wait, and squeeze harder, and eventually, maybe, your coil gets damp.
That is, by definition, not a squonk.
Look it up, people! Squonking requires enough juice be flowin' to make a SOUND when returning from whence it came. It's an onomatopoeia dammit!
A disposable pre-built RDA deck, now I've seen it all.
Kanger could have atleast thrown their 75W chip in it, then I may be interested for a first time cheap squonk try. 60w is to low.
Holy fucx, guy! I couldnt even watch dudes video because he says "umm" every freaking 3 seconds. That was cringe worthy. Im not trying to be super mean, but you cant fathom how annoying that was.
Holy fucx, guy! I couldnt even watch dudes video because he says "umm" every freaking 3 seconds. That was cringe worthy. Im not trying to be super mean, but you cant fathom how annoying that was.
I thought the reviewer had a really soothing voice and I enjoyed listening to him; it was a pleasant change from some of the ego-maniacal, bouncing off the walls reviews, (seemingly made for teenage boys) that I see so much of, which was refreshing, too.
I had to go back and listen again before I noticed the um's. Guess it didn't annoy me
Im not talking about Vapnfagen, Im was talking about the first guy. Idk why, but those umms were killing me. Lol.
And Vapnfagen used to have good reviews, but over the past few months hes became more and more stuck up and bitxhy and loves to talk about drama.
And Vapnfagen used to have good reviews, but over the past few months hes became more and more stuck up and bitxhy and loves to talk about drama.
Well, not worthless as I did get a peek from some angles I hadn't seen. Take that baby apart and give me a close up video of the insides and knowledge of bottom feeders will not be necessary.
I also did not find it worthless cause as he said, I knew a little more about it after watching his vid than before I did. This though is not the 1st video I've watched by someone who isn't all in the know. I'd rather have this than nothing at all to see what's actually going on with a device.
Look around- many reviews popping up are from people we've never seen before. The top reviewers aren't even reviewing these products. If they were then we wouldn't be scouring YT looking for first-looks & impressions; at least I know I wouldn't cause it would show up in my notifications that one of them I'm subscribed to has uploaded a video on xyz I'm interested in.
!!! G*NOTE FIVE !!!
I feel you Train!!!! Many people don't know squonking is all about the sound!Um. All other minor concerns and guesses aside - it would have been nice, being a squonker, if it actually SQUONKED.
From both videos, it clearly does not.
You squeeze and wait, and squeeze harder, and eventually, maybe, your coil gets damp.
That is, by definition, not a squonk.
Look it up, people! Squonking requires enough juice be flowin' to make a SOUND when returning from whence it came. It's an onomatopoeia dammit!
I think when KT releases v2, that's when we'll hear the squonk.
!!! G*NOTE FIVE !!!
Not sure how many people here are on the ohman page on Facebook but some guy just uploaded a video using his pancake dripper on the kanger dripbox. The only thing he complained about was it was slow to feed the juice to rda, but otherwise good. Least he confirmed other BF rda's work fine.
Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
Cool - and as suspected from the videos, where it really looks clear that they need to revisit that tube, and maybe yank the plunger off the bottom of it...
Pretty much, maybe you could just pop that plunger off the bottom of the tube.
Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
