3. Regardless, it’s always
possible that there’s an as-yet-unidentified interaction between those small quantities of HPHC that are present and which causes a problem…
What problem?
4. But the world’s first study of long-term
vaping never-smokers has shown no negative physiological changes over 3.5 years.
Great!
4. Formaldehyde is present in cigarettes,
vaping products and HTPs, but the exposure is less than those from, er, being indoors.
As we know, and have known.
5. Junk science is endemic in the field, although junk PR is a more insidious problem and likely the lever that creates the issue.
Junk Science and Fake News. Business as usual.
6. Something radical now needs to be done the continuous erosion in public confidence in vapor products. The UK, despite having the most supportive public health community in the world, has yet again seen another annual decline.
Even though Junk Science loses, Fake News wins.
7.The Cochrane organization, the world’s most respected arbiter of medical science data, absolutely destroyed the methodology used by Stanton Glantz and colleagues in their efficacy meta-analysis. In what other field could a scientist’s credibility remain intact?
Climate Scientists. Most Economists.
