Wheres everyone's spirit?
I think I'm going to go watch Braveheart again.
I think I'm going to go watch Braveheart again.
I think whoever started this thread is crazy...
ditto Risky
Why you are saying risky? (I dont know anything about political science and our country is Republic
& Democratic ; so, we can protest against Govt. policy legally Wikipedia:India)
that was the name of the guy I was agreeing with lol
I have gone Mad...@ChipCurtis : Analog makers will not give away their market so easily.Calculate the amount Any Govt. get from analog sales tax
I dont want the blood shed too...we all have to fight together..."you are not alone"...
I don't know too much about what's going on politically in India, but here in U.S. we are re-making the Caste System that you guys apparently got rid of, or are wanting getting rid of. We have nothing left in the U.S. but a handful of wanna-be aristocrats and an overwhelming population of uneducated, feudal subjects who are led around on a leash and told how to live, eat, think, conduct themselves. A large population with no facility for critical thinking.
People have to smoke, and people have to get sick from smoking. No matter what. From a human welfare perspective, it's sick and twisted. From a business perspective, it's necessary.
It won't matter. I will vape whether it is illegal or not. Vaping stopped me from smoking and that is a good thing. If they try to make it illegal it'll go underground and we'll still be able to do it.![]()
Someone asked why, if nicotine can be found in potatoes, why cant we call e-cigs a potatoe product? While I laughed at that, and there is a certain logic to it, the fact is is that most of the nicotine in e-juice is derived from tobacco. To my knowledge, that puts it squarely in the FDA's sights.
While it may seem somewhat contradictory to the above, I submit the following, a quote from Martin Luther King, Jr:
One may well ask: "How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?" The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all."
I don't think that you and Dr. King are expressing anything contradictory. You are both observing that the individual is sovereign, and obtains his rights from natural law, and then delegates certain authority to government. When government makes a law that contravenes natural law, it need not be followed. IMO, you are Dr. King are both correct.
Quite right. I have no intention of recognizing a law that takes away my right to self medication.