ECA in the News

Status
Not open for further replies.

nycsublimegirl

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2008
884
0
45
NYC
Starting a new thread to post news stories where the ECA has been quoted:

[FONT="]E-cigarette an option for Staten Island's smokers
[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#293546][FONT="]by Staten Island Advance
Sunday July 05, 2009, 9:41 PM
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
Jan Somma-Hammel/Staten Island AdvanceSusan Albano of Prince's Bay puffs on electronic cigarette, also known as e-cigarette, as vendor Amit Harel touts the tobacco-free product at Staten Island Mall.

Susan Albano took her first drag at 15 in a Brooklyn school yard. By her early 20s, she was addicted.
The 51-year-old Prince's Bay woman -- who sometimes plans her day around where and when she can smoke, which even she admits is absurd -- has tried to kick her pack-a-day habit "a million different ways" ever since.

Hypnosis and acupuncture failed. She was allergic to the adhesive in nicotine patches, and Chantix -- a smoking-cessation medicine -- made her sick. Cold turkey didn't work either.
Last week, Mrs. Albano took her first puff on an electronic cigarette -- simply known as an e-cigarette.

The battery-powered, tobacco-free, nicotine-delivery device looks like the real thing, right down to the odorless vapor mist. And while e-cigarettes are being criticized by anti-smoking groups and monitored by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), they are embraced by large numbers trying to quit or avoid bans on lighting up in public.

"My sister got it first, and me and Mom are trying it now," Mrs. Albano said after purchasing a starter kit in the Staten Island Mall at the Smoke Anywhere Kiosk, a cart decorated with gold ribbons to match the product packaging, glossy boutique-style shopping bags and glamour shots of e-cigarette users who might make the Marlboro Man jealous.

"My sister had some spots the doctors thought could have been lung cancer. We just got the good news that it's not. She had a kidney removed due to cancer and we thought it was spreading. It was kind of a wake-up call to all of us."

Starter kits, which typically include the battery-powered cigarette, replaceable cartridges and chargers, range in price from $70 to $150 at mall kiosks or online retailers.
When the user inhales, a heating element is activated, vaporizing the nicotine solution, which comes in a variety of strengths and flavors.

The tip glows red, imitating a real cigarette, but without the odor or secondhand and tar-filled smoke. E-cigarettes can be used in airports, shopping malls, restaurants and movie theaters --or anywhere a cigarette can't.

"We think this is a reliable and safe alternative to smoking," said Matt Salmon, president of the Electronic Cigarette Association, a Washington, D.C.-based trade group representing an industry on track to make $100 million this year.

"It gives smokers the nicotine they crave, but without all the known carcinogens found in combustible cigarettes."

TOO MANY UNKNOWNS?

But some see e-cigarettes as nothing more than smoke and mirrors.

The American Cancer Society, the American Lung Association, the American Heart Association and the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids have joined Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) in calling on the FDA to remove them from the market until they can be tested.

Critics also charge children may be attracted by the e-cigarette's novelty, accessibility and its chocolate, strawberry, vanilla, cherry or mint flavorings.
"These devices haven't been examined by any government agency," said Alberta Brescia, regional vice president of the Staten Island American Cancer Society. "We don't know how the ingredients are affecting the body."Many smokers who use [e-cigarettes] also continue to smoke cigarettes, and they are under the false impression that because they are smoking fewer cigarettes, it's OK to keep smoking."

The FDA has banned several shipments of e-cigarettes from coming into the country -- mostly from China, where they have been manufactured for the last five years -- saying the product is a drug-delivery device requiring agency approval before being legally marketed and sold in the United States.

There is also no scientific data documenting the safety of e-cigarettes, a spokeswoman for the agency said.

But Salmon said his group's members sell e-cigarettes strictly as an alternative that allows smokers to get their nicotine in a way that is more palatable, not as smoking-cessation products that need federal regulation. They also do not sell to minors, though many non-members play by their own rules.

NOT TAKING CREDIT

"There are a lot of anecdotes out there about people kicking the habit, but those aren't claims we're making," said Salmon, a non-smoker who as an Arizona congressman pushed through a state law that was among the nation's first public-smoking bans.

Some companies have taken the FDA to court, arguing the agency has no jurisdiction over e-cigarettes because they are not designed to help people quit.

"You've got special interests out there that see us as a threat or maybe even a displacing technology and they're trying to do everything they can to gear up the FDA and the powers that be here in Washington to protect them," said Salmon, noting his association is not involved in any of the pending litigation.

"Withholding the e-cigarette from the market is like telling someone who chooses to smoke that his or her only legal option is to smoke tobacco," he said. "My feeling is government should try to help people have an alternative, not take them away."

For Mrs. Albano, an executive assistant to the CEO of Thomson Reuters in Manhattan, there is only one reason to power up her e-smoke.

"I think the concept is just perfect for people who want to quit -- and I want to quit."

[I]-- Contributed by Stephanie Slepian
[/I][B]See more in[/B] [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#405094][FONT="]News[/FONT]
[FONT="] [URL="http://www.silive.com/news/index.ssf/news/"]<http://www.silive.com/news/index.ssf/news/>[/URL]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]





[/FONT]









http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=7814430 Matt Salmon representing the ECA


http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/bal-to.hs.cigarette18may18,0,6367460.story ECA Baltimore Sun


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/02/us/02cigarette.html ECA NY times
 
Last edited:

nycsublimegirl

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2008
884
0
45
NYC
[FONT="]Importers fight ban on electronic cigarettes
[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][FONT="]
[/FONT][FONT="]Brigitte Yuille[/FONT][/COLOR][/B][FONT="]
[/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT][B][FONT="]Florida company leads lawsuit against government agency[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT][COLOR=#333333][FONT="]FLORIDA: A Florida importer of Chinese electronic cigarettes is leading the fight against a US government ban on the product, and is awaiting a decision from a federal court. [/FONT][FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT][FONT="]Smokers in the US could see more options if a seller of Chinese-made electronic cigarettes wins its lawsuit. Bloomberg News [/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT]

[FONT="]An electronic cigarette is intended to be a smokeless alternative to regular cigarettes that delivers nicotine without heavy carcinogens. It is made up of a small steel tube that contains a battery, a nicotine cartridge and atomizer. The nicotine is vaporized for inhaling, and a white mist is exhaled. [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]Since March 17, shipments of e-cigarettes, cigars, and pipes, and their components - many of which come from China - have been banned. But in May, Sunrise, Fla.-based Smoking Everywhere Inc filed a complaint with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), asking that it refrain from stopping shipments from its Chinese manufacturers. [/FONT]

[FONT="]"The lawsuit seeks an order stopping the FDA from treating the product as a drug, and to require it to treat it as a tobacco product," said Walt Linscott, lead counsel for Smoking Everywhere. "As a tobacco product it can compete with traditional cigarettes." [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]In a statement, the company cited a 2000 US Supreme Court decision that determined "the FDA lacked the authority under the Federal Drug and Cosmetic Act to regulate traditional tobacco cigarettes as a drug/medical device combination". Smoking Everywhere said the same legal rationale should apply to its electronic cigarettes. [/FONT]

[FONT="]Scottsdale, Ariz.-based Sottera Inc, which sells NJoy electronic cigarettes, has also joined in the lawsuit. Attorneys for both sides in the case have closed their arguments and are awaiting the judge's decision. [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]"Once a judge says the article is a drug, all bets are off," said Benjamin England, an attorney and former FDA regulatory counsel who also assisted Smoking Everywhere with the FDA request. [/FONT]

[FONT="]"The FDA is likely to become more aggressive on the product and its distributors, and may move from simply detaining and refusing the products entry," returning them to China, or having the products seized England said. [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]England added that as enforcement increases, more wholesale buyers will refuse to carry the products. [/FONT]

[FONT="]"Right now, buyers are bearing the loss, because they are paying in advance," he said. "Buyers will shift the risk of getting the goods across the border to the manufacturer." [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]According to court documents, the FDA examined the product information that Smoking Everywhere submitted and determined that electronic cigarettes are a "drug device combustion product." [/FONT]

[FONT="]The FDA arrived at its conclusion based on determinations it has made on other nicotine-containing products, such as gums and a nasal spray, and thus believes that electronic cigarettes fall within its jurisdiction. The FDA also pointed out that while other products obtained FDA approval to market in the US, Smoking Everywhere has not submitted an application that demonstrates the product's safety. [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]"The agency will continue to evaluate these products on a case-by-case basis," the FDA said in a statement. FDA officials say the agency has taken action because of the potential of addiction and abuse. [/FONT]

[FONT="]If the importers win their suit, electronic cigarettes could be a revenue boon for Chinese companies, said Matt Salmon, president of the Electronic Cigarette Association. [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]According to Salmon, the industry is on track for $100 million in sales. He also said electronic cigarettes have significant benefits over regular cigarettes, such the lack of second-hand smoke and reduced carcinogens. [/FONT]

[FONT="]However, the American Cancer Society, Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, the American Lung Association and the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids support the FDA's decision to ban the imports. [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]Critics point out that e-cigarettes allow direct inhalation of nicotine and may challenge some smoking laws. They're concerned that the fruit-flavored products are being marketed to young adults online and their ages aren't being verified. They are also alarmed by unproven health claims suggesting the product is safer than normal cigarettes. [/FONT]

[FONT="]"Absent scientific evidence these claims are in blatant violation of FDA rules," said the American Lung Association in a press statement. [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]But Salmon defends the importers, saying they have taken measures to avoid marketing that reaches children. He said that consumers are required to complete a form on seller's Internet sites indicating they are of legal age to purchase tobacco products. In retail locations, the products are sold in the same location as tobacco, which is usually kept behind counters to limit access. [/FONT]

[FONT="]In addition, the cost is prohibitive to most children, Salmon said. Starter packs typically cost $80, with 10 cartridges costing about $20. [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]He also argues that because "the only substance that might be in question is nicotine," that "common sense would tell you it probably wouldn't need clinical trials." [/FONT]

[FONT="]But US Senator Frank R. Lautenberg of New Jersey disagrees. He has urged the FDA to ban e-cigarettes until the product is thoroughly tested. Lautenberg is a staunch proponent of anti-smoking regulations and helped write the law banning smoking on airplanes, among related legislation. He has also fought cigarette companies that market their product with "light" or "low-tar" labels. [/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]"Manufacturers and retailers of these products claim that e-cigarettes are safe, and even that these products can help smokers quit traditional cigarettes," Lautenberg wrote in a March letter to the FDA. "There have been no clinical studies to prove these products are effective at helping smokers quit," the senator added. "Nor have any studies verified the safety of these products or their long-term health effects." [/FONT]
 

nycsublimegirl

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2008
884
0
45
NYC
[FONT="][URL="http://www.boston.com/news/health/articles/2009/07/21/alex_beam_knows_where_theres_e_smoke_theres/"]Alex Beam knows where there’s e-smoke, there’s... - The Boston Globe[/URL]

[/FONT][FONT="]Where there’s e-smoke...
[/FONT][/B][COLOR=#272727][FONT="]By Alex Beam <Alex Beam - Boston.com Local Search>
Globe Staff / July 21, 2009
clip_image001.gif

[/FONT][/COLOR][FONT="]Not my beloved Larks (gack!) or non-filter Kools (double gack!) of yore. Now I am smoking a plastic doohickey known as “No. 9,’’ an electronic cigarette.
E-cigarettes are to tobacco cigarettes as e-mail is to snail mail. Both deliver, just in a different fashion. The e-things, which cost $69 for a starter kit that seems to last quite a while, are actually rechargeable electronic devices with the look and feel of real cancer sticks. The “filter’’ has a tiny, microprocessor-controlled atomizer that vaporizes a mixture of propylene glycol - the stuff used in theatrical smoke machines - and liquid nicotine when you inhale. You exhale vapor, which vanishes immediately.
The idea: It’s like smoking, but it’s not smoking. You get a nicotine fix, but not the superheated smoke and chemicals that Philip Morris & Co. want to push into your lungs. If you don’t count the gross taste of nicotine in your mouth, the whole process is odorless and doesn’t annoy people near you. The No. 9 even has a plastic tip that glows when you inhale.
How is it? Well, it’s cool to be smoking again, just like those smooth fellows on “Mad Men.’’ People think I’m French or James Dean, which is a step up for me. I’ve smoked my e-coffin nail in cafes, libraries, and restaurants, so far without incident. I should add that I have done a lot of this smoking in New Hampshire, where there are no laws at all.
So why does the Food and Drug Administration want to ban them? That’s an interesting question, one the FDA can’t answer right now because its lawyers are in court as we speak, trying to enforce its authority over the devices. Heaven knows there are plenty of nicotine products out there - patches, gums, and so on - so how the FDA lawyers concluded that “distribution of E-Cigarettes in commerce in the U.S. is prohibited’’ is beyond me.
FDA, schmeffDA, the e-butts are on sale everywhere, at mall kiosks, through the Costco website, and about a billion other places on the Internet. Former Arizona congressman Matt Salmon, the front man for the Electronic Cigarette Association, says the market for e-fags has multiplied from under $10 million to $100 million in just the past year or so.
Salmon twists himself into knots explaining that his products aren’t supposed to help you kick the habit. If they were marketed as smoking cessation devices, which they certainly can be, then the FDA could definitely regulate them. In court papers, the FDA calls the e-butts a “drug device combination’’ of the type it should be allowed to regulate. I bet the e-merchants enjoy their current status of slipping between the cracks. For instance, e-cigarettes are not mentioned in the recently passed Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, and are not subject to confiscatory federal and state excise taxes.
You might think the anti-smoking yapsters would welcome the appearance of a “safe cigarette.’’ You would be wrong. The pressure group Action on Smoking and Health claims that the exhaled vapor contains a “deadly’’ substance, nicotine. ASH is circulating a petition that reads: “If you don’t want people sitting next to you - in a waiting room, restaurant, bar, or any other area where smoking is now prohibited - using one of these devices to get around smoking bans, and forcing you and your loved ones to inhale deadly nicotine - please help now!’’
Dr. Michael Siegel, a professor at Boston University School of Public Health, writes on his blog: “From a scientific perspective, there simply is no evidence at this time that electronic cigarette use poses any significant risk to nonsmokers.’’
What’s the bottom line? If you would like to quit, then e-cigarettes’ milder dose of nicotine - less than one fifth of a tobacco cigarette - might help. (Got that, President Obama?) If you are hooked on nicotine, the cooler vapor is a lot better for you than tobacco smoke. The e-cigs are cheaper, too, averaging out to about $2.50 or $3 for a putative pack, versus $6 and up for the real thing.
And if you want to look like James Dean in “East of Eden’’ or Jean-Paul Belmondo in “Breathless’’ - oh, never mind.
[I]Alex Beam is a Globe columnist. His e-dress is [URL="http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/beam@globe.com"]beam@globe.com[/URL]. [/I]
clip_image002.gif

[/FONT][FONT="]


[/FONT]
 

nycsublimegirl

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2008
884
0
45
NYC
Last edited:

nycsublimegirl

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2008
884
0
45
NYC
[FONT="]The St. Peterburg Times printed this article
[url=http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/article1025004.ece]Electronic cigarettes set for battle with FDA - St. Petersburg Times[/url]
[/FONT][/B][B][FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
Electronic cigarettes set for battle with FDA
[/FONT][/B][FONT="]By Nicole Norfleet, Times Staff Writer
Posted: Aug 05, 2009 10:15 AM [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT][/CENTER][/CENTER]
[FONT="]







[/FONT][FONT="]Electronic cigarettes don't contain tobacco or tar, but a South Florida company is fighting for its high-tech substitutes to be identified as tobacco products.
Why struggle to be grouped with a product vilified for killing millions of people each year? At least for Smoking Everywhere Inc., it's a step up from having its product regulated as a drug.
Smoking Everywhere distributes e-cigarettes, which can't be lit and don't have tobacco. They are battery-operated and contain cartridges filled with nicotine, flavor and other chemicals. The steel tube that is made to look like a cigarette turns nicotine and water into a vapor that is inhaled.
Company representatives will be in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 17 for a hearing in federal district court to challenge the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which wants e-cigarettes labeled as drug devices under its jurisdiction.
The FDA has not approved e-cigarettes as safe and has seized shipments being imported into the country.
Smoking Everywhere filed a lawsuit against the federal agency in April and sought a restraining order claiming that the FDA doesn't have the authority to control its products.
"It is an electronic cigarette, and a cigarette is not designed to stop someone from smoking … so practically speaking it would not fall under the definition of a drug," said Walt Linscott, a lawyer for Smoking Everywhere.
Smoking Everywhere and another e-cigarette company, NJoy, which is a plaintiff in the suit, have had about 50 shipments confiscated by the FDA, Linscott said.
Smoking Everywhere imports all its cigarettes from China. With shipments not able to pass through U.S. Customs, its distributors will eventually run out, he said.
The FDA asserts that it's protecting consumers. Right now, it's unclear how e-cigarettes will affect users' health, said Judy Leon, a spokeswoman for the FDA.
"It is important for the American people to know what is in electronic cigarettes in terms of the chemicals and the dose of nicotine," Leon said.
In a court filing, the FDA proposes that e-cigarettes fall in the category of drug devices as defined in the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. They are designed, the FDA argues, to help in the treatment of nicotine addiction, which some medical experts have labeled a disease.
No matter how the companies market the product, e-cigarettes deliver nicotine, so the FDA has the authority to regulate them, Leon said.
Smoking Everywhere claims that unlike nicotine gums and transdermal patches that the FDA regulates, its e-cigarettes are a safer alternative to smoking, not necessarily a means to quit smoking.
"A regular cigarette has no therapeutic value. ... It's not designed to provide a health benefit. It's quite the opposite ," Linscott said.
David Drobes, a researcher who works in the Tobacco Research and Intervention Program at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, said that if e-cigarettes are not regulated now, the public may regret it later.
"If history proves anything, it is that companies that say they offer safer cigarettes really don't have the data to support that," he said, referring to light cigarettes advertised to have less tar and nicotine, claims that health advocates have found misleading.
The FDA announced on July 22 that a laboratory analysis of e-cigarettes found that they contain carcinogens and toxic chemicals such as diethylene glycol, an ingredient used in antifreeze.
Matt Salmon, the president of the Electronic Cigarette Association, criticized the report as too narrow in scope and not including a peer review.
"My personal feeling is that it was a lot more about public relations than public health," Salmon said.
If Smoking Everywhere wins the lawsuit and becomes part of the big boys club of tobacco companies, it still faces rough waters.
At the end of June, President Barack Obama signed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act to create stricter tobacco regulation.
Despite this legislation, Linscott said Smoking Everywhere is ready to face the challenges of being a tobacco company.
"If we are correct that it is a tobacco product, we are subject to all of the limitations and regulations of Marlboro and any other traditional cigarettes that you can name," he said.

Tobacco roadblocks
If e-cigarettes are found to be tobacco products, here are some ways the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act could pose some issues for Smoking Everywhere:
• By October, tobacco companies will no longer be able to make candy or fruit-flavored cigarettes. Smoking Everywhere has different flavors of cartridges such as vanilla and strawberry.
• Tobacco manufacturers may no longer sponsor sporting, athletic and entertainment events using tobacco product brand names and logos. This year Smoking Everywhere sponsored several large entertainment events, including the 40th Annual NAACP Image Awards, the Grammy Awards and the Oscars.
• A new Center for Tobacco Products will oversee the science-based regulation of tobacco products, which would ultimately put the control of tobacco products in the FDA's hands.[/FONT]​
 

LaceyUnderall

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 4, 2008
2,568
5
USA and Canada
Battery-powered cigarettes catch on with consumers | Detroit Free Press | Freep.com

Pretty good article mentioning one of ECF's Forum Suppliers as well as mention of the ECA.

Also very interesting is:

"The FDA has stopped about 50 shipments of e-cigarette products at the border, but now faces a lawsuit from two U.S. companies that sell the products. For now, "there is no import alert on e-cigarettes at the border," FDA spokeswoman Siobhan DeLancey told the Free Press."

This is the same Siobhan DeLancey who was quoted in another article that has been discussed by Dr. Siegel on his blog just today!

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: FDA Quoted as Stating that It's Not Sure Cigarette Smoking is Any More Dangerous than the Use of Electronic Cigarettes
 

tony206

Moved On
Sep 25, 2009
57
0
  • Deleted by Misty
  • Reason: unregistered supplier
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread