email I got from the FDA

Status
Not open for further replies.
Smoking cessation???

Nope not here, I am not interested in stopping smoking. I just refuse to pay the taxes on them now. I can smoke all day for pennies. If I do stop then thats a bonus, but I am not kidding myself, nicotine is a big monkey and why should I go thru hell kicking a habit.

Sad thing is we have lost all manufacturing, so we can not get local made fluids.

My state loses $2.52 a day I do not buy a pack of smokes. Wisconsin is #5 on taxes on tobacco. :)
 
Schoolboy, 14, nearly dies in free nicotine gum binge | Metro.co.uk

Boy 14 nearly dies chewing nicotine gum.

I don't think anyone has nearly died simply from overdosing on analogues.
There is also an overdose risk with patches if you continue to smoke, not likely with vapour as it is unlikely you would do a lot of both as it has the same mechanics as smoking.
 
Futhermore if ecigarettes are banned it is inevitable a black market will develop, in liquids
and atomisers, which would be less safe for existing and inevitably new young smokers.
Atomisers can't be hard to make they only cost a few dollars and people an already make their own liquids.
I have got all my cigarettes on the blackmarket for the last 15 years I don't like paying the highest taxes in Europe. The cigs are all smuggled in in big packs, or big 1/2 kilo packs of tobacco, that pack would last me 5-6 weeks, a similar sized pack of liquid would last me a lot longer, let me see I reckon you could get 60+ 30ml bottles in the same space, so I think we are talking about what several years supply in the same volume? And I buy 3 packs at a time!! Currently they crush smugglers cars and that don't stop stop em.

So a ban will be totally ineffective anyway, at least as far as I am concerned, apart from makng the product cheaper, as it is with analogues for me know, as black market ones are 1/3 the price!!
 

Superstargoddess

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2009
863
0
47
Ohio
Schoolboy, 14, nearly dies in free nicotine gum binge | Metro.co.uk

Boy 14 nearly dies chewing nicotine gum.

I don't think anyone has nearly died simply from overdosing on analogues.
There is also an overdose risk with patches if you continue to smoke, not likely with vapour as it is unlikely you would do a lot of both as it has the same mechanics as smoking.

Can anyone confirm the risk of no chance on OD'ing on a PV? I can't possibly see how it would even happen, I say 0% chance. Unless you are an idiot and drink the liquid, then you will be fine. And even if you did drink the liquid, I think that it would probably cause you to puke it all out anyway. Uneducated guess there, but that's what I would figure.
 

Superstargoddess

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2009
863
0
47
Ohio
Futhermore if ecigarettes are banned it is inevitable a black market will develop, in liquids
and atomisers, which would be less safe for existing and inevitably new young smokers.
Atomisers can't be hard to make they only cost a few dollars and people an already make their own liquids.
I have got all my cigarettes on the blackmarket for the last 15 years I don't like paying the highest taxes in Europe. The cigs are all smuggled in in big packs, or big 1/2 kilo packs of tobacco, that pack would last me 5-6 weeks, a similar sized pack of liquid would last me a lot longer, let me see I reckon you could get 60+ 30ml bottles in the same space, so I think we are talking about what several years supply in the same volume? And I buy 3 packs at a time!! Currently they crush smugglers cars and that don't stop stop em.

So a ban will be totally ineffective anyway, at least as far as I am concerned, apart from makng the product cheaper, as it is with analogues for me know, as black market ones are 1/3 the price!!

I honestly don't see how they would even be able to flat out ban it really. I don't think that it has anything in it that a patch or anything else doesn't have and it's not like it has any illegal drugs in it or anything. I can see them totally regulating it or making the liquid manufacturers use a little bit less of this or that component in it, but I can't see them just flat out banning it.
 

sue

New Member
Aug 13, 2009
2
0
Please don"t let them ban this. I quit real cigs 4 days ago, and bought e-cigs yesterday as I was missing the hand to mouth, swirling smoke kinda thing (tho I was wearing a nicotine patch). Tonight, while having a few glasses of wine and relaxing, I have reached for my pack of cigs, only to happily remember that I am now smoking e-cigs (i keep alternating between the full, low and zero nic). Five days ago I was a pack or more a day die hard smoker - today I am loving my e-cig - never would have thought it possible.
 

sonic__temple

New Member
Jul 15, 2009
4
0
When I was a teen, our school still had sexual education classes. We were "introduced" to sex. Didn't mean we had to do it. In the state I live in, my 5 and 14 yr old daughters can sit at a bar in a restaurant with me (as close to the taps as they want) and be "introduced" to what alcohol is. Doesn't mean they will want to try it. My kids walk into any gas station in this state to buy a pack of gum. When they are ready to pay for it, what is directly behind the cashier? An "introduction" to A WHOLE WALL OF CIGARETTES! Doesn't mean they are going to start smoking. I suppose my problem with that statement "may introduce young people to" is very subjective. I think it should be my job to guide my kids in the proper direction not the FDA.
 

stevo_tdo

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 27, 2009
605
2
Missouri
Alternative quit smoking methods that have been proven safe? Like the patch that has killed people and Chantix which currently has a law firm running a commercial about, wanting people to come forward and sue that company?

We need scientific data, someone go get Bill Nye the science guy!

I would love that. I might even settle for beakman's world. What would work however is everyones famous Dr. Oz who's always on oprah. Then you'll have a huge demographic knowing the benefits. I almost believe people trust him more than the fda. Remember, Oprah is god.
 

Webby

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Mar 31, 2009
796
15
USA
Well young people will smoke cigarettes if they want to, it's legal!!

no no no...that simply isn't true.

The cigarette vending machine in my local restaurant here around the corner, out a view, between the toy grabber arm machine and the golf video game, and the bathrooms says they are strictly for adults....

...and if an adult should happen to catch some kid buying cigarettes BOY would they get a stern look...
 

paise

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 9, 2009
382
146
This BS ab the danger to kids is ......ed, im sick of hearing it. Did you hear the confrence call? I would never take my kid to that pediatrician because he is a complete .....!
They haven't been able to stop kids from using tobacco products for as long as they've been around. Atleast with ecigs there not going to die!

by the way, proven cessation = <15% after one year, and both gums and patches contain DEG, what an @55 hole! FDA = F*^*&ING DUMB @55es

And... what about the booze kids seem to get their hands on? How many car accidents and deaths have occurred from kids getting their hands on alcoholic beverages yet nothing is EVER said to the alcohol industry. It isn't as if a cigarette (e-cig or tobacco cig) is going to kill a kid with one-time use. They can't say the same thing about booze. All it takes is for some stupid kid to start downing Everclear and their dead; all it takes is for one kid to attempt to drive home drunk and they are likely dead as are others on the highway. That doesn't happen with cigarettes yet the FDA, ASH and the rest of the alphabet soup always get their panties in a wad every time something comes up about smoking or a smoking device. That just pisses me off.
 

dopebeat

Full Member
May 10, 2009
29
0
45
Sorry, but this email sounds for the most part fair and well balanced, the suppliers of e-cigs and more importantly the liquid are completely unregulated at the moment, browsing through the forum shows that allergic reactions to ingredients in juices are common occurrences and that most have had bad experiences with at least one supplier.

At the moment we as users are test cases on the effects that these products will have in the long term and to expect the FDA to approve of an industry where there are no doubt players who scour China for the cheapest possible liquid and don't have the facilities to analyse the contents of their products is crazy.

Hopefully they won't put their foot down and ban the juice outright, but equally I would hope for them to shut down suppliers that are found to be selling liquid with unneeded dangerous chemicals.

Self regulation by existing suppliers is essential to the reputation of the industry, despite it not being illegal it is for all extents and purposes currently a black market.

The issue of age of consumer is one which should be addressed by all suppliers via their websites, currently I have not seen a single age check more stringent than; Are you over 18 YES/NO. How difficult would it be to restrict purchases to credit cards only and thus ensure that your users are over 18. And for people without credit cards emailing of copies of identification could be used for initial verification of account. Of course that would be easily defrauded but a good supplier should be seen to be doing all they can to ensure the safety of their product.
 

Superstargoddess

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2009
863
0
47
Ohio
And... what about the booze kids seem to get their hands on? How many car accidents and deaths have occurred from kids getting their hands on alcoholic beverages yet nothing is EVER said to the alcohol industry. It isn't as if a cigarette (e-cig or tobacco cig) is going to kill a kid with one-time use. They can't say the same thing about booze. All it takes is for some stupid kid to start downing Everclear and their dead; all it takes is for one kid to attempt to drive home drunk and they are likely dead as are others on the highway. That doesn't happen with cigarettes yet the FDA, ASH and the rest of the alphabet soup always get their panties in a wad every time something comes up about smoking or a smoking device. That just pisses me off.

Yeah, without a doubt. I'd say that alcohol is a much bigger threat than analogs or PVs. I remember when I was 17 I got a bad case of the alcohol poisoning. I was fine, but it wasn't good. I didn't have to go to the doctor or anything, but it was still bad. Well, my grandmother wanted to take me to the doctor but I was all like no no no no.
 

SLDS181

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 11, 2009
1,325
1
Western NJ
Sorry, but this email sounds for the most part fair and well balanced, the suppliers of e-cigs and more importantly the liquid are completely unregulated at the moment, browsing through the forum shows that allergic reactions to ingredients in juices are common occurrences and that most have had bad experiences with at least one supplier.

You can't blame allergic reactions on suppliers if their ingredients are listed. Thats why they are listing them.

At the moment we as users are test cases on the effects that these products will have in the long term and to expect the FDA to approve of an industry where there are no doubt players who scour China for the cheapest possible liquid and don't have the facilities to analyse the contents of their products is crazy.

Ok, I really need to ask here, because people keep saying this. The effect of what long term?

We know the long term effects of inhaling propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin. This was studied for use in fog machines.

We know what nicotine does to the human body.

We know that extracting nicotine from tobacco can result in trace amounts of carcinogens, and that a good manufacturing process will minimize this. This is a matter of the supplier of the pure nicotine to the company mixing the juice, not the juice company.

Many flavors are also used in aerosol air fresheners, perfumes, etc and have been for many, many years.

So what part do we not know the long term effects of?

Self regulation by existing suppliers is essential to the reputation of the industry, despite it not being illegal it is for all extents and purposes currently a black market.

Calling it a black market is ridiculous.

Dietary supplements are monitored, not regulated. They can be very dangerous, and are imported in massive quantities each day. The FDA monitors it by.... get this...

Making the manufacturers self-police and responsible for their products! Crazy, I know...

The issue of age of consumer is one which should be addressed by all suppliers via their websites, currently I have not seen a single age check more stringent than; Are you over 18 YES/NO. How difficult would it be to restrict purchases to credit cards only and thus ensure that your users are over 18. And for people without credit cards emailing of copies of identification could be used for initial verification of account. Of course that would be easily defrauded but a good supplier should be seen to be doing all they can to ensure the safety of their product.

Thats precisely the same method used for many products sold over the internet that have a minimum age to purchase.

You can be over 18 and not have a credit card.

You can be under 18 and have a credit card.

So thats not really a good solution. And I sure as hell wouldn't go to any company that required my identification to be sent to them, thats just insane. NOTHING has that level of regulation, and nothing ever will.
 

paise

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 9, 2009
382
146
Yeah, without a doubt. I'd say that alcohol is a much bigger threat than analogs or PVs. I remember when I was 17 I got a bad case of the alcohol poisoning. I was fine, but it wasn't good. I didn't have to go to the doctor or anything, but it was still bad. Well, my grandmother wanted to take me to the doctor but I was all like no no no no.

Superstargoddess: My DH nearly died from alcohol poisoning. He went to the beach with a bunch of his friends. They stayed at one of the friend's house. (It was her and her husband's summer place) They were all drinking, having a good time, and partying and then DH went down and nobody could wake him up. Next thing anyone knew the ambulance had to come get him. He nearly died from drinking too much bourbon not to mention the fact he is a juvenile diabetic; however, like me during those years, both of us were heavy drinkers so it wasn't unusual for him or me (we traveled in different circles at that time) to drink more than many of our friends.

His mother had to come get him from the hospital but they couldn't release him for about 3 days until his alcohol levels came down to normal and his sugar levels returned to normal. His mother is a retired nurse so you can imagine the argument that took place over that 2-hour ride. :oops:

Personally, I would rather have had a total outright beating by my birth father than to have to handle his mother after something such as that and my birth father was an angry, physically abusive alcoholic. He didn't care where he hit, what he used to hit, or how long he hit as long as he was hitting someone, which was usually me b/c my mother was usually working opposite of him so my younger sibling and I caught the brunt of his rage although when he started on my brother I would do whatever it took to piss him off enough to forget about going after my brother so he would come after me instead. My baby brother would never have survived the beatings I took... Never. He'd have likely killed himself first. I'm sure of it.

Now my aunt (mother's oldest sister) has got in my face when caught drinking underage, which I did with a fair degree of regularity. For me, it was an escape. It was the only time I could reach the point where I felt nothing; I was numb. It was better than the pain, the hate, and even the disappointment and shame I felt all the other times when I was sober.

What bugs me the most is that it is almost easier for a kid to get hold of alcohol than it is for them to get cigarettes although, depending on the kid (I was one of them) getting hold of either/or or both was never a problem.

During Bush's term when his underage twin daughters were going out drinking illegally used to piss me off. Those two had presidential security guards yet why didn't they yank their little a$$es out of those nightclubs and drag their butts home instead of just standing there like a lump on a log letting them get slobbered down drunk where it was captured on television for all the teen America to see and look up to doing.

It gave the message that if the president's kids could do it then it must be okay so we can do it. That just royally ticked me off.

DH and I have been open with both our girls over alcohol. If they question it or want to taste it we are not above letting them. Usually they make this ugly face because we don't drink many fruity-type drinks - at least not at home or around the holidays when among family. Like for me, I'll throw together a Gibson every now and again or have a glass of red wine and DH usually drinks a Tom Collins or a glass of red wine. (Gibson is like a martini only it has vermouth and gin with onions as garnish vs olives). My girls thinks Gibsons are gross. They think the same of their dad's Tom Collins and only just within the last year has my oldest, whose almost 22 years old, has just got to the point where she can appreciate a fine wine with a meal - not the cheap stuff, which tastes like rot gut but a nice wine served with a meal. It's taken time but now she realizes that wine is not something to get drunk on. Each type of wine can and often does compliment a meal especially if you know how to match a specific wine with a specific dish, which I do.

I hope my youngest does like her oldest sister and hates the taste of alcohol until she's old enough to learn to appreciate it without abusing it. She never went to the beer blasts. To be honest, my oldest hates beer. I hate domestic beer. DH calls me a snob but if it isn't imported, I don't drink it. LOL.

On nights when both the girls are gone and the spa is filled and ready, he will stop by to pick up 2 six-packs of beer. He can't get just one b/c he doesn't like import and I don't like domestic so he buys one of each. Usually we go through 2 to 3 bottles each over a course of a few hours kicked back in the hot tub with the bubbles going, music playing in the background, and just the spa lights on low in the bottom of the tub. (It's inside in a wet room so we don't have to worry about neighbors. There's a window but it has a layer of that material on it that makes it so you can't see through the window even though the window has a nice set of drapes with matching sheers under it and two huge matching art prints (30 x 40 give or take; they are big & they are Cuban art work) to go with the drapes, the linoleum, and one day I'll have a freaking palm tree or coffee tree in that room. I have a small tree in the room now along with a few tables with decorations to make it look nice. There's a huge cabinet that holds the chemicals and stuff but it also has hooks to hold robes and towels.

The spa time is about the only time we get to wind down together without kids so we can feel like a husband and wife not a worn down daddy and mommy. Unfortunately we haven't been able to use it since DH had those 2 heart attacks that caused him to have the quadruple bypass. It will be some time before the docs will release him to use the hot tub and even then I'll have to turn the heat way back. I had to do the same thing when my oldest was doing her physical therapy in the spa after she was t-boned in the driver's side door. She has a heart condition too. If the water is too hot, usually above 100 degrees, it can cause her heart to beat irregularly and cause tachy that can lead to a heart attack. It has to be down around 97 to 98. I keep it at 102 when I'm in the tub alone. It has a cool down seat though. That help keep either of them from getting too hot.

I used the money I got from selling some rental property I owned to buy the hydrotherapy spa to do physical therapy in for myself with the lupus and Sjogren's with the joint disease. It's also a medical tax write off because my doc prescribed it since I can't travel to the health center, I can't run because of the pressure on my joints, I can't job either. Walking is tough here because of high heat and higher humidity. The spa was the one thing I could do and it's great in the winter when your frozen to the core of your being.
 

dopebeat

Full Member
May 10, 2009
29
0
45
You can't blame allergic reactions on suppliers if their ingredients are listed. Thats why they are listing them.

That's great if they make them themselves, but I wouldn't like to put any money on all suppliers knowing exactly what is used in the liquids they import.


Ok, I really need to ask here, because people keep saying this. The effect of what long term?

We know the long term effects of inhaling propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin. This was studied for use in fog machines.

We know what nicotine does to the human body.

We know that extracting nicotine from tobacco can result in trace amounts of carcinogens, and that a good manufacturing process will minimize this. This is a matter of the supplier of the pure nicotine to the company mixing the juice, not the juice company.

Many flavors are also used in aerosol air fresheners, perfumes, etc and have been for many, many years.

So what part do we not know the long term effects of?

None of the research about PG was conducted with the thought that people would be using it in personal vapourisers mixed with nicotine and I know of no one that has been regularly inhaling their perfume for many years. We can make assumptions based on the research that has been done in the past, but assumptions wont hold any weight in court.



Calling it a black market is ridiculous.

Dietary supplements are monitored, not regulated. They can be very dangerous, and are imported in massive quantities each day. The FDA monitors it by.... get this...

Making the manufacturers self-police and responsible for their products! Crazy, I know...

e-cigs aren't even monitored, just like the sale of ......., you have no idea what different juices contain, neither do half the suppliers.


Thats precisely the same method used for many products sold over the internet that have a minimum age to purchase.

You can be over 18 and not have a credit card.

You can be under 18 and have a credit card.

So thats not really a good solution. And I sure as hell wouldn't go to any company that required my identification to be sent to them, thats just insane. NOTHING has that level of regulation, and nothing ever will.

Being seen to do something is far better than to be seen to do nothing, and internet gambling sites have long requested copies of identification to verify age and identity. If you don't trust them with a copy of your passport, you really shouldn't trust them to be primarily concerned with the safety of the products they are selling.

I don't know, maybe I'm too mistrustful of Chinese Health and Safety standards and suppliers that use cheap websites, I think that there are companies involved in the trade that have less morals than it would take to accidentally kill their customer base.
 
Last edited:

paise

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 9, 2009
382
146
Thats precisely the same method used for many products sold over the internet that have a minimum age to purchase.

You can be over 18 and not have a credit card.

You can be under 18 and have a credit card.

So thats not really a good solution. And I sure as hell wouldn't go to any company that required my identification to be sent to them, thats just insane. NOTHING has that level of regulation, and nothing ever will.

That's how identification theft occurs. I should know. Somebody stole my identification last year, run up a utility bill to some $800 and then either left or changed the name on the account. I get a call from Ohio, FREAKING OHIO telling me I have an $800 electric bill. I've never been to Ohio! I've never LIVED in Ohio. So how in the world does somebody get my name and my address and my information to bill an electric company in OHIO?

I'm like you, there's no way in Hello I'm sending anybody my personal information just to have it get stolen again. They can have the bare minimum to cover my order and nothing more. I'm sick of people stealing identification, putting others in hock for their bills, then skipping out without a way to catch them. That's one of the reasons I want somebody to begin addressing the problem of so many illegals in this country because they are the top of the food chain of the identity theft rings.

Oh, and it's been about a year since I learned of this Ohio bill thing and the police are no closer to solving now than they were a year ago. :mad:

Some benevolent being better help the person(s) who stole my identity because if I find them, they'll sure need someone to step in to help because if I find them I'm going for blood. I had finally earned A credit after my ex-husband ruined my credit only to have some thief ruin it again....

BTW, my 21, almost 22yo daughter has had a credit card since she was 16, almost 17 years old. She's had a safety deposit box and overdraft protection too. She's been working in the public since she was 15yo. She bought her own car with HER money when she turned 16.
 
Last edited:

SLDS181

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 11, 2009
1,325
1
Western NJ
That's great if they make them themselves, but I wouldn't like to put any money on all suppliers knowing exactly what is used in the liquids they import.

I would.

Here, let me put it to you this way. When you buy toothpaste, do you buy it from the dollar store? Why/why not?

Buy from reputable people, get a reputable product. Suppliers *should* know exactly what ingredients are in what they are importing.

None of the research about PG was conducted with the thought that people would be using it in personal vapourisers mixed with nicotine and I know of no one that has been regularly inhaling their perfume for many years. We can make assumptions based on the research that has been done in the past, but assumptions wont hold any weight in court.

Its a mixture. There is no chemical combination of PG + nicotine, so the difference between inhaling pg and inhaling PG plus nicotine is..... none. Your claim that it won't hold weight in court is a baseless assumption, because you don't know that to be true.

e-cigs aren't even monitored, just like the sale of ......., you have no idea what different juices contain, neither do half the suppliers.

BS. I go to supplier sites, and I see "List of Ingredients".

PV's don't need to be monitored, the liquid should be. And it should be monitored just like dietary supplements are, in my opinion. But, I'm not making claims out of nowhere, and I'm not making ridiculous comparisons to ....... of all things - stop that please.

Being seen to do something is far better than to be seen to do nothing, and internet gambling sites have long requested copies of identification to verify age and identity. If you don't trust them with a copy of your passport, you really shouldn't trust them to be primarily concerned with the safety of the products they are selling.

1) Gambling sites do it because....... you can't use them in the United States! Yay..... truth!
(BTW, the laws were horribly written, and some have figured out a way through it.... resulting in more regulations. But you are limited to what you can do based on what country you are from. Its also a bad idea to give them your passport.)

2) Its not the companies that isn't trusted, its the information being saved somewhere. Do you have any idea how many online stores get broken into each year by hackers?

Seriously, stop and think for a minute here.
 
Last edited:

SLDS181

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 11, 2009
1,325
1
Western NJ
That's how identification theft occurs. I should know. Somebody stole my identification last year

Exactly the issue! I've had my identity stolen once, and a second attempt two or three years later after my information was "misplaced" by a bank.

BTW, my 21, almost 22yo daughter has had a credit card since she was 16, almost 17 years old. She's had a safety deposit box and overdraft protection too. She's been working in the public since she was 15yo. She bought her own car with HER money when she turned 16.

And thats it right there! (both credit card and my favorite thing, personal responsibility).
 

paise

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 9, 2009
382
146
Dopebeat: Everything boils down to what that doctor who basically trashed the FDA report said. You're not asking the right question. The right question is: Are e-cigarettes safer than traditional tobacco "analog" cigarettes and the answer is a quantitative YES! They are MUCH safer than a standard tobacco-filled, 4000+ carcinogen filled analog cigarette.

That is the question you should be asking but you're tip-toeing around the right question.

As for diet pills, any teenager can walk into a pharmacy and by them. I used to do the same thing. It's up to parents to know what their children are doing, - to some degree that's not the government's job.

As for adults, what we do should be our choice and not regulated by the government. Instead, the government treats us adults as though we are children in need of supervisor and guidance by slapping us across the hands telling us not to do that.

If I want to buy a naturally growing herb that is indigenous to this country that was used for centuries to treat illness with the side effects ranging from giggles to sleepiness to the munchies to crashing without pain then I should have the right. I don't have the right to get on the highway after smoking said herb but I should have the right to smoke it.

If I want to take a drink in my home, I should have the right. If I want to use e-cigarettes versus standard tobacco cigarettes then I should have that right. The government shouldn't have the right to stop me. If I want to order my medications overseas where there is no 110% markup by the pharmaceutical companies then I should be able to do it.

I haven't taken an order from my parents since before I was 15 years old. Why in the heck would I take an order from the government over doing something that as an adult I know my limits as to what I can and cannot handle or do? When did the government earn the right to be my mother or father and treat me like a child? This is a country whose government seems to have forgotten that THEY WORK FOR US, not the other way around. It's time WE THE PEOPLE taught them a big lesson in that fact, IMHO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread