There are medics on both sides of this argument.
Here is a GP (general practice physician) who has opened a vape shop next to his surgery (office):
Doctor sells ecigs ...so it's fairly obvious what side he is on.
The most senior figure in tobacco control in the UK, Prof Britton of the RCP (Royal College of Physicians), says that if all smokers switched to ecigs then 5 million lives would be saved in the UK just among those alive today. It's also pretty obvious which side he is on. He's joined by Profs West, Hajek, Polosa, Flahault, Bauld, McNeill, Siegel, Phillips, Rodu and many others. Against them are people like Glantz, who are regarded as corrupt since they speak for their funders, the pharmaceutical giants, who need to protect smoking as it generates around $150 billion a year for them.
The most obvious characteristic of the average medic who is an anti is how ignorant they are of the issues. Prof Siegel says they need "a remedial course in basic science". If you ask them about the history of PG, or what medicines it is used in, and what types of use it has pharmaceutical licenses for, and the relative quantities of the different materials in vapour, they simply wouldn't have a clue - they are just repeating the poisonous commercial propaganda.
One of the weirdest effects of the propaganda has been how nicotine is perceived. It's a normal part of the diet (or should be). In a recent survey 44% of British doctors thought it was associated with cancer - which is completely wrong according to their own official clinical guidance body, NICE - "Nicotine does not cause cancer and is not associated with cancer".
This is a propaganda war and those with the most money and influence win. The facts get lost in the fog.
Here is a GP (general practice physician) who has opened a vape shop next to his surgery (office):
Doctor sells ecigs ...so it's fairly obvious what side he is on.
The most senior figure in tobacco control in the UK, Prof Britton of the RCP (Royal College of Physicians), says that if all smokers switched to ecigs then 5 million lives would be saved in the UK just among those alive today. It's also pretty obvious which side he is on. He's joined by Profs West, Hajek, Polosa, Flahault, Bauld, McNeill, Siegel, Phillips, Rodu and many others. Against them are people like Glantz, who are regarded as corrupt since they speak for their funders, the pharmaceutical giants, who need to protect smoking as it generates around $150 billion a year for them.
The most obvious characteristic of the average medic who is an anti is how ignorant they are of the issues. Prof Siegel says they need "a remedial course in basic science". If you ask them about the history of PG, or what medicines it is used in, and what types of use it has pharmaceutical licenses for, and the relative quantities of the different materials in vapour, they simply wouldn't have a clue - they are just repeating the poisonous commercial propaganda.
One of the weirdest effects of the propaganda has been how nicotine is perceived. It's a normal part of the diet (or should be). In a recent survey 44% of British doctors thought it was associated with cancer - which is completely wrong according to their own official clinical guidance body, NICE - "Nicotine does not cause cancer and is not associated with cancer".
This is a propaganda war and those with the most money and influence win. The facts get lost in the fog.