I used up exactly 2,000 characters. These jerks aren't taking away my ecigs.
[See attachment]
Abstract:
The FDA should refrain from regulating e-cigarettes as tobacco products. There is no evidence that the products are in need of regulation beyond the safeguards that are already in place. Nobody is developing lung disease, heart attacks, strokes, or cancer from using e-cigarettes. There are fewer cases of nicotine poisoning with e-cigarette liquid (11) than with FDA-approved nicotine patches, gum, and lozenges (1,413.) There is no evidence that e-cigarettes are causing serious harm to either users or the general public.
In fact, smokers who switch to e-cigarettes report improvements in their health. Friends and family members are delighted that the people they worried about are no longer killing themselves with smoking.
If any e-cigarette manufacturer wants to be able to advertise that their products reduce health risks when compared with smoking, they can apply to the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation & Research (CDER) for fast-track approval as an innovative product for (1) Total abstinence from tobacco use, (2) reductions in consumption of tobacco, and (3) reductions in the harm associated with continued tobacco use. Given the powerfully positive effects on public health, the products should remain on the market during the approval process.
Telling smokers not to use low-risk alternatives is like telling passengers on the sinking Titanic not to use the lifeboats, because they haven’t been certified 100% safe by the Coast Guard. (“Just keep swimming!”) Regulating low-risk products by taking them off the market, reducing their effectiveness, or obfuscating their relative risks is like punching holes in those lifeboats. People are dying, folks. It’s time to get smart about helping smokers quit.
I am a 33 year old former smoker with a 20 pack-year history. I stopped smoking on January 4, 2012 after receiving my first electronic cigarette kit. I have been using these devices, or 'vaping' as it is referred to colloquially, ever since.
I have experienced no significant side effects. I have noted important improvements in my health - morning cough disappeared, effort tolerance improved, along with resting heart rate and blood pressure. I had a mild retinopathy attributed to HTN which since resolved.
There is a substantial body of evidence linking tars, CO, and other substances in cigarette smoke, but not nicotine, to health hazards. There is some safety evidence for nicotine use from pharma NRTs. There is evidence from the Swedish cohorts showing smokeless tobacco, even, to be significantly safer than smoking.
E-cigs vaporize a mix of propylene glycol, glycerine and nicotine with optional added food grade flavorings. No other potentially harmful chemicals have been detected at clinically significant level in e-cig liquids.
E-cigs have the potential to offer a harm reduced, attractive alternative to smoking for those smokers who cannot or do not want to cease their nicotine habit. They tackle both the supposed chemical dependence to nicotine and offer a pleasurable experience that pharm NRTs do not.
NRTs have a staggering fallure rate. Non-NRT smoking cessation meds have considerable side effects.
It stands to reason that research into e-cigs should be the main priority of an honest public health organization and large trials should be fast tracked. No one can honestly ignore or try to hinder e-cigs while at the same time considering extending NRT usage approvals.
There is no reason, however, to deem e-cigs as pharm products. They are consumer, non-tobacco, nicotine containing product. That's what they are. Deeming them as anything else is disingenuous.
Please regulate e-cigs on par with alcoholic beverages for safety standards and cleanliness alone.
Very well said aubergine, and I am quite sure all of us feel the same way.And this is just unproductive venting, but I'm so intensely, furiously, numbingly ......