Hope is great, but right now we're down 14 points and there's two minutes left in the game.
There's always a chance. I mean there's a chance that a giant meteor could hit Washington DC before May 11th.So, you're saying there is still a chance.
Hope is great, but right now we're down 14 points and there's two minutes left in the game.
I posted some thoughts regarding this lawsuit a few days ago here:
Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!
Haha, I was thinking that but decided I might get beat up mentioning Tom Brady anywhere but in a New England Patriots forum.And I don't see a legal version of Tom Brady to lead us into a miracle finish.
Haha, I was thinking that but decided I might get beat up mentioning Tom Brady anywhere but in a New England Patriots forum.
Woo hoo!!!! We have hope.
I suppose the PMTA deadline might get pushed back to 2021/2022, where it was prior to the AAP et al decision?Say we Won, which is Kinda like Arron Rogers throwing 2 Hail Mary's with No Timeouts left, what would we Really Achieve?
I suppose the PMTA deadline might get pushed back to 2021/2022, where it was prior to the AAP et al decision?
Reality: We've been on borrowed time since 8/8/2018 (the original deadline).
It seems the media is anything but tired of doing that. Just look at the hysteria they're stirring up over a couple of dozen youngsters hospitalized with lung problems ostensibly due to vaping.If I felt that there was some Pro Advocacy Momentum building, or if the Media would get tired of throwing e-Cigarettes Under the Bus, or if we could just Hold Off until some New Legislation or Political Leadership could come to bare, I would be More Positive.
I think in the end, the real question will be: How much effort will they put into enforcement?And an Argument could be that Maybe it would be Better to have the PMTA Drop Dead Date occur in this Cycle? Verses in the Next?
I think in the end, the real question will be: How much effort will they put into enforcement?
The fact that something is illegal on the federal level does not mean the agency responsible for it will necessarily do much (or anything at all) to enforce against it.
Agreed, but don't you think it would be better to vape-stuff readily available in some states rather than none at all?True... But where the Problem lies is that without a Clear Federal Policy/Enforcement, state policy makers will take it upon themselves to do what they Want. Or what they feel will get them the Most Votes from an Uninformed populous.
Agreed, but don't you think it would be better to vape-stuff readily available in some states rather than none at all?
I think in the end, the real question will be: How much effort will they put into enforcement?
The fact that something is illegal on the federal level does not mean the agency responsible for it will necessarily do much (or anything at all) to enforce against it.
True... But where the Problem lies is that without a Clear Federal Policy/Enforcement, state policy makers will take it upon themselves to do what they Want. Or what they feel will get them the Most Votes from an Uninformed populous
Sure... that's a Captain Obvious type question.
But the FDA is going enforce the Deeming Regs. There's just Too Big of a Spot Light on them to Not. So it Isn't like Some States will be Unaffected while other are.
So in Many Ways, I would like to see the FDA just let the Hammer Drop. Because it would Slow Down much of what I see states doing.
Then the Feds can Tax e-Cigarettes. And the Tide can Turn.
I think it's possible that the FDA will use their enforcement power specifically against teen vaping. ...