My 'addiction' to incandescent lightbulbs was taken care of by the federal government.
My 'addiction' to freedom is not so open to any such 'cure'.
My 'addiction' to freedom is not so open to any such 'cure'.
I wouldn't say "proved just the opposite" - but it certainly made the case for no existing detectable gateway effect - which is now explicitly stated by UK gov.lol Yep, AND just after the other study proved just the opposite. The sciencedirect thread by SJ.
Leaked FDA industry guidance to ecig manufacturers. If this is for real, we're doomed. Read the part that says even zero-nicotine eliquid would be classified as "tobacco"
I knew it would be bad but if this goes through as is, it truly is the end of vaping, and those who see that as fear-mongering are just plain ignorant.
What I think is a shame is this assumption that the white house is just going to rubber-stamp whatever nonsense the FDA dishes up. If that was true, then why bother submitting it at all? Because it's the law? Hell, those idjits MAKE the law, I'm sure they could do away with it if they felt so inclined; they've been whittling away at our constitutional rights for a couple centuries now, it would be no biggie.
I just want to know how much more of the Constitution has to be trampled before we finally rise up and tell them WE'RE MAD AS HELL AND NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!
Andria
I believe that was April's submission, prior to public comment. I don't believe they have to make the Final available to the public until after it is approved by OMB/OIRA, but could be wrong.So what they submitted isn't spring 2015?
It's kinda Amazing, at least to Me, that a thread about Cotton ...
https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/f...n-is-white-so-why-japanese-cotton-not.708776/
... has Twice as many Posts as this one does.
I guess How White cotton is, or Should Be, is More topical that the current state of the FDA Deeming process.
Okay, newsworthy, but not necessarily actionable. For now it seems like the best bet is still the Cole bill. I've already broadcast that CTA a number of times.There are 9 steps in the rule making process to the Deeming Order and step 8 was taken this week. I guess it all depends on how one defines newsworthy, but in my world that is newsworthy. Certainly no where near as big of news as step 9 is going to be, but never-the-less still newsworthy.
To me putting nic in the freezer is the same as house, medical and car insurance. Those three are thousands of dollars a year. 3 bottles of nic for $150 is a decade of protection and dirt cheap.
I did some more figuring. Starting with nothing I could spend $300 up front and be self sufficient for 3 years except, perhaps, batteries. In that same time I could spend $9,000 on cigarettes, a carton a week in Michigan. Vaping isn't cheap, it's free if you want it to be. This gigantic disparity in cost and the ease of DIY severely complicates control, taxation, etc. Health issues will be debated ad nauseam. The economics not debatable. I believe more people around the world will switch to save money than to protect their health. Lots of people have lots of money in the US so may be the economic advantage is not so obvioius.
Some more numbers. If 1.3 billions smokers are spending $800 billion a year that's about $600 per smoker. If they all switched to vaping and spent $100 each per year the vape market would be $130 billion and that lower amount includes no excise taxes, which would be hard to collect anyway. This is what obsesses our dear governments, not our health.
To me putting nic in the freezer is the same as house, medical and car insurance. Those three are thousands of dollars a year. 3 bottles of nic for $150 is a decade of protection and dirt cheap.
I did some more figuring. Starting with nothing I could spend $300 up front and be self sufficient for 3 years except, perhaps, batteries. In that same time I could spend $9,000 on cigarettes, a carton a week in Michigan. Vaping isn't cheap, it's free. Health issues will be debated ad nauseam. The economics are not debatable. I believe more people around the world will switch to save money than to protect their health. Lots of people have lots of money in the US so may be the economic advantage is not so obvioius.
Some more numbers. If 1.3 billions smokers are spending $800 billion a year that's about $600 per smoker. If they all switched to vaping and spent $100 per year the vape market would be $130 billion, an amount that includes no excise taxes, which would be hard to collect. This is what obsesses our dear governments, not our health.
This is the double edged sword of vaping though. I vape on the cheap. I don't DIY but even without that I only spend a few hundred annually on gear AND juice. It is incredibly difficult to have a growth industry when people don't have to buy stuff. Yes you can DIY for pennies a day, but if everyone did that, what would happen to the juice vendors that provide for the newbies and those who don't want to DIY? It's great that vaping on the cheap is an option, I just hope, for the sake of the industry, that most people find a balance.Yeah... Have you seen the threads around here about how vaping costs more than smoking? Only to a person incapable of exercising restraint over the "shinyitis" bug -- for anyone with a grown-up approach to spending money, vaping is LOADS cheaper. Sure, I *COULD* spend a whole lot... but why? The setup I use now is absolutely perfect, I have no need to keep buying tons of crap just because it's shiny. Providing Innokin is still with us next year, I'll grab another couple of coolfire4's, just because I try to buy a few new mods every year as a hedge against electronics-death -- but so far, every one I've bought still works.
Andria
Listen up folks, lets keep the chatter about how many liters of liquid you have in the deep freeze out of this thread. This isn't about you, this is about the 40 plus million folks who still smoke, and if the deeming is a bad as originally advertised that number will essentially remain unchanged.
You are going to have to be more specific Steve instead of making more vague accusations. I have kept up on the calls to action and I have seen none of the sensationalism you are accusing CASAA of doing. You need to give specific examples if you expect anyone to take you serious.I used to read the calls to action then proposed legislation. There's usually a disconnect between the proposals and their summaries and 'attention grabbing' titles and summaries. How can an 'advocacy' group be taken seriously when they use fear and sensationalism?
I hear the ANTS operate covertly and lurk around every corner...
If nicotine weren't addictive, there wouldn't be hoarding based on fear of loss of supply...
Now you are being argumentative. Supply chains for consumers can be established just as they are for tobacco. Pilot projects that study how to speed up the process could be pursued by entities like the Gates Foundation if they were interested. The extreme cost advantage of ecigs is a huge help. That will be discovered over time. Demand will grow. Entrepreneurs will gear up to meet demand. This will happen every where there is smoking. The issue is how fast it will happen.You can't buy DIY stuff or hardware in 3rd world countries for what you can in the US, so it ends up being more expensive. There's also having to have a computer and credit card to order, As shops are few and far between...