FDA On The Job

Status
Not open for further replies.

englishmick

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 25, 2014
6,706
36,475
Naptown, Indiana
  • Like
Reactions: DC2

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
Seems like they gave into pressure-

The warning comes several days after a large group of anti-tobacco organizations sent the FDA a letter urging the agency to enforce regulations against Santa Fe Natural tobacco over marketing claims. That letter, sent on Monday, was signed by 29 groups including the American Heart Association, American Legacy Foundation and Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

Wonder if that anti group from Pennsylvania is among the 29...
 

Isabelle49

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 27, 2015
203
588
76
Now they are going after American Spirit for saying their product doesn't contain added chemicals.

"The issue over the claims is that they may lead consumers to believe the products pose a lower risk."

MAY. Gawd help us.

My Way News - FDA issues warning letters to "natural" tobacco makers

Leading consumers to think those products pose a lower risk is a valid reason for the FDA to get involved. American Spirit products may not have added chemicals, how does the company advertise and present their products. If they are doing so in a manner that sounds as if they are safer, that would be misleading.
 

MaxwellPink

Super Member
ECF Veteran
While I'm glad they're distracted for at least a little bit, I'm saddened to see American Spirit take the hit.

Seriously, are people that stupid?

Rhetorical question, I know.

That was my brand of choice. And never once did I think of them as safer. Just better tasting -- for a cigarette.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpargana

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
Leading consumers to think those products pose a lower risk is a valid reason for the FDA to get involved. American Spirit products may not have added chemicals, how does the company advertise and present their products. If they are doing so in a manner that sounds as if they are safer, that would be misleading.

If they don't have added chemicals and and the tobacco is grown organically and processed without chemicals, wouldn't that mean it is safer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC2

MaxwellPink

Super Member
ECF Veteran
If they don't have added chemicals and and the tobacco is grown organically and processed without chemicals, wouldn't that mean it is safer?

Yes and no. It's kind of like when they started adding filters and making light cigarettes. These things may make the cigarettes safer in the extent of the harm, but not enough in the grand scheme of things, if that makes any sense.
 

Isabelle49

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 27, 2015
203
588
76
If they don't have added chemicals and and the tobacco is grown organically and processed without chemicals, wouldn't that mean it is safer?

The tobacco might be safer, but the method of consumption would not be. It is common for consumers to see "organic" and "safe" and read into that as meaning it is safe for consumption in the manner intended, when it is really not safe. This is as bad as when "doctors" we're featured in cigarette television ads years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpargana

Maurice Pudlo

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 27, 2013
1,601
2,232
United States
For the sake of conversation I think it would be a better option to require tobacco companies to print ingredients used in their products.

If I were in the market for a combustable tobacco product I'd like to know what non tobacco products are in the available range of products I was looking at. In that same vein I'd like to know which are organic and which are not.

At this point it seems the FDA is more messing with consumer choice than combustable tobacco consumer safety.

I recall
Death (cigarette) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Death (Black Death) cigarettes, which were very clear about their products lack of good for you status.

My ultimate thought on harmful products is this, tax the product till its impact is born fully by the consumer. The end.

Non-smokers already fund the FDA and any efforts it makes regarding tobacco, that shouldn't be the case.

Maurice



..,
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. 8/27/15

Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. 8/27/15

ucm113123.gif
Department of Health and Human Services

Food and Drug Administration

Center for Tobacco Products
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
AUG 27, 2015
VIA UPS and FAX
Michael Little, President
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
1 Plaza La Prensa
Santa Fe, NM 87507
WARNING LETTER
Dear Mr. Little:
The Center for Tobacco Products of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed your cigarette product labeling and determined that your cigarette products are manufactured and distributed or offered for sale to customers in the United States. Under section 201(rr) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. § 321(rr)), as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act), these products are tobacco products because they are made or derived from tobacco and intended for human consumption. Certain tobacco products, including cigarettes, are subject to FDA jurisdiction under section 901(b) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387a(b)).
FDA has determined that several of your cigarette products are adulterated under section 902(8) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387b(8)) because they are modified risk tobacco products sold or distributed without an FDA order in effect that permits such sale or distribution.
Modified Risk Tobacco Product Violations
You sell or distribute cigarette products the label, labeling, or advertising of which represents explicitly and/or implicitly that the products or their smoke do not contain or are free of a substance and/or that the products present a lower risk of tobacco-related disease or are less harmful than one or more other commercially marketed tobacco products. Specifically, you sell or distribute Natural American Spirit cigarettes described in product labeling as “Natural” and “Additive Free.”
A tobacco product is considered a “modified risk tobacco product” under section 911(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387k(b)(2)(A)(i)) if its label, labeling, or advertising explicitly or implicitly represents that: (1) the product presents a lower risk of tobacco-related disease or is less harmful than one or more other commercially marketed tobacco products; (2) the product or its smoke contains a reduced level of a substance or presents a reduced exposure to a substance; or (3) the product or its smoke does not contain or is free of a substance. Under section 911(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387k(a)), no person may introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce any modified risk tobacco product without an FDA order in effect under section 911(g) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387k(g)). A product that is in violation of section 911(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387k(a)) is adulterated under section 902(8) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387b(8)). Your product labeling for Natural American Spirit cigarettes, which uses the descriptors “Natural” and “Additive Free,” represents explicitly and/or implicitly that the products or their smoke do not contain or are free of a substance and/or that the products present a lower risk of tobacco-related disease or are less harmful than one or more other commercially marketed tobacco products. As such, these products are modified risk tobacco products. Because these products are sold or distributed to customers in the United States without an appropriate FDA order in effect under section 911(g) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387k(g)), these products are adulterated under section 902(8) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387b(8)).
FDA recognizes that Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. has entered into a consent order with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding the company’s use of additive free claims in tobacco product advertising (Federal Trade Commission, In the Matter of Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc., a corporation, Docket No. C-3952, Decision and Order, Issued June 12, 2000). This order requires, in part, that the company display certain disclosures (e.g., “No additives in our tobacco does NOT mean safer”) in any advertisements using claims that represent tobacco products as having no additives, unless the company possesses and relies upon competent and reliable scientific evidence demonstrating that such products pose materially lower health risks than other tobacco products of the same type. This consent order predates the Tobacco Control Act, which was enacted on June 22, 2009 and gave FDA authority to regulate the manufacture, sale, distribution, and promotion of tobacco products, including authority over modified risk tobacco products under Section 911 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387k). As noted above, under section 911(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387k(a)), no person may introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce any modified risk tobacco product without an FDA order in effect under section 911(g) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387k(g)). Because you sell or distribute modified risk tobacco products without an appropriate FDA order in effect under section 911(g) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. § 387k(g)), you are in violation of the FD&C Act, notwithstanding your consent order with FTC.
Conclusion and Requested Actions
The violations discussed in this letter do not necessarily constitute an exhaustive list. You should immediately correct the violations that are referenced above, as well as violations that are the same as or similar to those stated above, and take any necessary actions to bring your tobacco products into compliance with the FD&C Act.
It is your responsibility to ensure that your tobacco products and all related labeling and/or advertising comply with each applicable provision of the FD&C Act and FDA’s implementing regulations. Failure to ensure full compliance with the FD&C Act may result in FDA initiating further action without notice, including, but not limited to, civil money penalties, criminal prosecution, seizure, and/or injunction. Please note that adulterated and misbranded tobacco products offered for import into the United States are subject to detention and refusal of admission.
Please submit a written response to this letter within 15 working days from the date of receipt describing your corrective actions, including the dates on which you discontinued the violative promotion, advertising, sale, and/or distribution of these tobacco products and your plan for maintaining compliance with the FD&C Act. If you do not believe that your products are in violation of the FD&C Act, include your reasoning and any supporting information for our consideration. You can find the FD&C Act through links on FDA’s homepage at http://www.fda.gov.
Please note your reference number, RW1500345, in your response and direct your response to the following address:
DPAL-WL Response, Office of Compliance and Enforcement
FDA Center for Tobacco Products
c/o Document Control Center
Building 71, Room G335
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
If you have any questions about the content of this letter, please contact Ele Ibarra-Pratt at (301) 796-9235 or via email at CTPCompliance@fda.hhs.gov.
Sincerely,
/S/
Ann Simoneau, J.D.
Director
Office of Compliance and Enforcement
Center for Tobacco Products
VIA UPS and FAX
cc:
Susan M. Cameron
President and Chief Executive Officer
Reynolds American Inc.
401 North Main Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101-3804
Dr. James Swauger
Vice President Regulatory Oversight
401 North Main Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27102

Here is the relevant part I think:
This order requires, in part, that the company display certain disclosures (e.g., “No additives in our tobacco does NOT mean safer”) in any advertisements using claims that represent tobacco products as having no additives, u
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
The tobacco might be safer, but the method of consumption would not be. It is common for consumers to see "organic" and "safe" and read into that as meaning it is safe for consumption in the manner intended, when it is really not safe. This is as bad as when "doctors" we're featured in cigarette television ads years ago.

I don't they ever said they are safe... Just like with vaping, lower risk does not mean safe...
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
Anyone seen an American Spirit ad lately? They have "Organic Tobacco does NOT mean a safer cigarette" and "No additives in our tobacco does NOT mean a safer cigarette" all over them. Yeah, the FDA is an on the ball organization.

I haven't seen a cigarette advertisement in the US in years... I guess people get confused easily. Wait until they get around to e-liquids...
 

Froth

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 1, 2014
1,184
1,592
Chipotle.
This is the kind of crap that upsets me in our nation, the corporations are so fearful of yet another lawsuit that they are forced take extreme measures to ensure that they don't offend the 'less than 1%' that would actually sue over something of the nature. Why oh why must I begrudgingly drink coffee that I don't find hot enough from almost every coffee house/fast food joint in the state? Oh yeah, lawsuits. Why do cars have ......ed tire pressure monitoring systems? Why am I forced as a 30 year old man with no children in my home to constantly open child-proof medicine bottles? Why does my packing tape dispenser say "caution sharp knife"(REALLY!?!?) There's no world for me out there anymore it seems, the person with common sense who knows better than to do things that could cause me harm(or the person who won't sue over something trivial)...there is so much money spent and so many hours wasted on things this nation doesn't need and so many things put to the side to address these "major issues" that don't really need a damn bit of addressing...

Now I'm angry.
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
This is the kind of crap that upsets me in our nation, the corporations are so fearful of yet another lawsuit that they are forced take extreme measures to ensure that they don't offend the 'less than 1%' that would actually sue over something of the nature. Why oh why must I begrudgingly drink coffee that I don't find hot enough from almost every coffee house/fast food joint in the state? Oh yeah, lawsuits. Why do cars have ......ed tire pressure monitoring systems? Why am I forced as a 30 year old man with no children in my home to constantly open child-proof medicine bottles? Why does my packing tape dispenser say "caution sharp knife"(REALLY!?!?) There's no world for me out there, the person with common sense who knows better than to do things that lack common sense...there is so much money spent and so many hours wasted on things this nation doesn't need and so many things put to the side to address these "major issues" that don't really need a damn bit of addressing...

Now I'm angry.


Wait until the lawsuits against e-liquid manufacturers begin...
 

satchvai

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 16, 2015
472
1,089
58
Off the grid
Maybe the chemicals are good then and help reduce tar...
The sad part is some of the chemicals do "good" things and there are many smokers that have a harder time breathing when they quit because of the additives they use in tobacco smoke that make it easier for the lungs to accept nicotine absorption which in turns makes it easier to breath. It sounds crazy until you do the research of the additive chemicals in commercial cigarettes. In all honesty, comparing any tobacco to any other tobacco is a moot point due to most of the harmful chemicals coming via combustible smoke. That is what makes vaping such a brilliant invention and a completely different animal from a risk profile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread