Grant, Nano or both?

what kind of GG you want to own exept the GGTS?

  • Grant

  • 14500

  • Nano

  • Both


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Mist_Of_Joye

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2009
888
9
Beirut-Lebanon
sleeve cant be made if we want a thin cig, because sleeve requires 2-3 mm more so it will be fat again.:)

That is true, I forgot this detail. And of course we don't want that.

How about an optional longer tube?

This way you would have produced both 2 models at the same time, without extra cost, and at the same time.
 

keon718nyc

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Hey guys, I know there is much talk about Imeo making a new 14500 and/or 16340 device as well as the new GGTS AFS but i am thinking that for now Imeo needs to focus on building and finishing the GGTS AFS for us and also the GG Slim AFS he was going to make and which i thought was already being worked on. Also cases to hold the GG's is in the works too (not a nessesity but can store a gem in its case). Now i have a collection of the GG's but think that there is not much more to make besides AFS's and possibly another GG to fit the batteries listed above. I feel bad for the guy in a way, We, including me ask alot of Imeo to bring to us to the table. I know people said "get back to work" to him and stuff which im sure is in good humor and faith as well as Imeo likes hearing from the GG family and others through the forum. I know he wants to keep up with the demand and quality ect. but i feel we need to sit back a bit and let him do his thing with the things he's working with now. Besides the point the GGTS is sold out along with many other GG items (In the USA) and we need to get those in stock soon. Ofcourse its a high demand product but should be available more of the time then less. I have a few people ready to buy a GGTS with the AFS and mouthpiece, but i rather them order everything together rather then piece by piece is a pain in the ..... Im by no means want anyone to feel this to be negative post but want to let others know what it comes down to. Imeo will say, don't worry keon i don't mind, but in all reality we need tostep back a step. If he has the man power to accomplish all the things asked for and thought apon, I give him the uttermost respect there possibly can be out there!!!

Much love and thanks to Imeo anyhow on all hes does and done for us all here in our vaping world~
:vapor::toast:
 

imeothanasis

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 13, 2009
47,882
34,510
Athens, Hellas
gg-goldengreek.com
That is true, I forgot this detail. And of course we don't want that.

How about an optional longer tube?

This way you would have produced both 2 models at the same time, without extra cost, and at the same time.

if I make an extra long tube Mist then I have to make different caps too because the 2nd tube would be fatter to fit other batteries. Its a second GG buddy:)
 

imeothanasis

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 13, 2009
47,882
34,510
Athens, Hellas
gg-goldengreek.com
Hey guys, I know there is much talk about Imeo making a new 14500 and/or 16340 device as well as the new GGTS AFS but i am thinking that for now Imeo needs to focus on building and finishing the GGTS AFS for us and also the GG Slim AFS he was going to make and which i thought was already being worked on. Also cases to hold the GG's is in the works too (not a nessesity but can store a gem in its case). Now i have a collection of the GG's but think that there is not much more to make besides AFS's and possibly another GG to fit the batteries listed above. I feel bad for the guy in a way, We, including me ask alot of Imeo to bring to us to the table. I know people said "get back to work" to him and stuff which im sure is in good humor and faith as well as Imeo likes hearing from the GG family and others through the forum. I know he wants to keep up with the demand and quality ect. but i feel we need to sit back a bit and let him do his thing with the things he's working with now. Besides the point the GGTS is sold out along with many other GG items (In the USA) and we need to get those in stock soon. Ofcourse its a high demand product but should be available more of the time then less. I have a few people ready to buy a GGTS with the AFS and mouthpiece, but i rather them order everything together rather then piece by piece is a pain in the ..... Im by no means want anyone to feel this to be negative post but want to let others know what it comes down to. Imeo will say, don't worry keon i don't mind, but in all reality we need tostep back a step. If he has the man power to accomplish all the things asked for and thought apon, I give him the uttermost respect there possibly can be out there!!!

Much love and thanks to Imeo anyhow on all hes does and done for us all here in our vaping world~
:vapor::toast:

thanks a lot my good friend Keon for this post and for your very nice words to me. I really want to make everything at the same time but its impossible, I am alone here. But I try very hard. Of course none of you bothers me by asking for dates but many times I am out of date. :)
 

grimmer255

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 5, 2009
3,271
12
somewhere out there......
your doing just fine Imeo :) and keep up the good work and there is no need to over work yourself either especially with your back the way it is now. I say just make two styles one 14500 grant and a mini-trans-grant/nano. You already have the specs from the older ggt just scale it down to fit only 16340 batteries.

Cr2's just dont hold up... but two cr123 3v. do a great job from what I hear on the forum. In addition, you can just take off the sleeve and you got a nano and at 19mm width, the user will have a great device that is simple, small, and could give the user 3.7 and 6v without having to add width. And on top of that it will be 1mm smaller in width than the orignal grant and 4mm smaller in width that the GGTS... can't go wrong with that. :)

So by adding 1mm in width to the 18mm grant, will give the user longer vaping time and protected batteries for the 3.7v and 6v vapor...I say it's worth the peace of mind considering the bad rep of the cr2 batteries.
 
Last edited:

imeothanasis

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 13, 2009
47,882
34,510
Athens, Hellas
gg-goldengreek.com
your doing just fine Imeo :) and keep up the good work and there is no need to over work yourself either especially with your back the way it is now. I say just make two styles one 14500 grant and a mini-trans-grant/nano. You already have the specs from the older ggt just scale it down to fit only 16340 batteries. Cr2's just dont hold up... but two cr123 3v. do a great job from what I hear on the forum. In addition, you can just take off the sleeve and you got a nano and at 19mm width, the user will have a great device that is simple, small, and could give the user 3.7 and 6v without having to add width.

Thanks for the nice idea Grimmer my friend:)
 

keon718nyc

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
your doing just fine Imeo :) and keep up the good work and there is no need to over work yourself either especially with your back the way it is now. I say just make two styles one 14500 grant and a mini-trans-grant/nano. You already have the specs from the older ggt just scale it down to fit only 16340 batteries.

Cr2's just dont hold up... but two cr123 3v. do a great job from what I hear on the forum. In addition, you can just take off the sleeve and you got a nano and at 19mm width, the user will have a great device that is simple, small, and could give the user 3.7 and 6v without having to add width. And on top of that it will be 1mm smaller in width than the orignal grant and 4mm smaller in width that the GGTS... can't go wrong with that. :)

So by adding 1mm in width to the 18mm grant, will give the user longer vaping time and protected batteries for the 3.7v and 6v vapor...I say it's worth the peace of mind considering the bad rep of the cr2 batteries.

I agree grimmer! And thanks Imeo as well! You are the man!~ This would complete the GG lineup for sure and attract others at the same time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread