All that I own right now is a Ameravape Manhattan, and am looking to get a box mod. I want the most advanced device, which I've decided is most likely a dna 40 device, assuming I get one with a functional chip, with no issues. My dilemma is deciding which dna 40 device to get. It seems the hana modz and Vapor Flask are of a higher quality than the Vapor Shark. Any ideas on how to determine the dominant device?
Hana Modz DNA 40 vs. Vapor Flask DNA 40
- Thread starter mstephens0500
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
I think it should come down to which one you like best, If all the chips are working them they should all function the same really. Vaporflask has twice the battery life though with 2x18650 . I happened to get the Flask because i went into my local B&M for some juice, picked up the flask as they were new in and happened to have enough money in my wallet to not need to put it down again. It does feel nice.
Best bang is the flask. Only $50 more for the flask than the hana and dual 18650 parallel batteries for extended battery life. Also the flask just looks downright amazing compared to the hana v3
Vapor Flask. Longer battery life. More ergonomic design, it just fits in your hand better than a squared off box mod. Solid build as the body is basically a single piece of metal. You can open the battery slots with that coin that's in your pocket. 22mm attys just look better on a Vapor Flask.
I have Flask40, and XPV40.
The XPV is very nice; but it has to be charged with USB only and it takes a while. -1
The Hana is a good feel; I have a dna30 and like it a lot.
The VS is loved by those that like them and there's a lot of those folks.
Check each out.
I like the XPV because its light vs. the Flask.
The Hana and VS are single batts, but really with a dna device, you are not going to be using a lot of Amps so changing out a batt every day (maybe more) is no big deal imo.
I guess it would come down to feel and function. The flask was my first choice because of dual batts, but all are great imo.
The XPV is very nice; but it has to be charged with USB only and it takes a while. -1
The Hana is a good feel; I have a dna30 and like it a lot.
The VS is loved by those that like them and there's a lot of those folks.
Check each out.
I like the XPV because its light vs. the Flask.
The Hana and VS are single batts, but really with a dna device, you are not going to be using a lot of Amps so changing out a batt every day (maybe more) is no big deal imo.
I guess it would come down to feel and function. The flask was my first choice because of dual batts, but all are great imo.
I have a Flask so I'm a bit biased (though I've always liked Vapor Shark products). One of the best features (IMO) of the Flask in comparison with other DNA40 devices is the fact that the screen is on top and you can see what's going on while you're vaping (trust me...you'll want to know what's gong when you start building with nickel).
Aside from that it's extremely ergonomic and looks amazing. Good luck.
Aside from that it's extremely ergonomic and looks amazing. Good luck.
Building with nickel and getting the DNA40 to cooperate is a pain. Not worth the effort in my opinion.
I have a Sigelei 100w that I enjoy way more than the VF.
I have a Sigelei 100w that I enjoy way more than the VF.
Last edited:
nickle is a bit more difficult if you are not used to making your own coils, but really, imo most of the "horror" stories (exaggeration) were the confusion between having a bad chip and trying to get a ni200 coil going for the first time, and not so much inherent in nickle wire.
Is rdna40 the same as VS dna40?
I hear the new rdna40 from VS is going to have the bigger screen and Zip CHARGER, and beeps if you put batt in wrong...
I hear the new rdna40 from VS is going to have the bigger screen and Zip CHARGER, and beeps if you put batt in wrong...
I hear the Hana uses glue to attach the internal electronics. Glue fails with heat. Glue fails with e-juice. Having had previous experience with a PV that used glue to secure it electronics, I will never make that mistake again. Plus, doesn't the Hana require a screw driver to replace the batteries?
My choice would be VS rDNA 40 or Vapor Flask.
My choice would be VS rDNA 40 or Vapor Flask.
I have both the Hana DNA 40 and the Vapor Flask DNA 40. The VF is in with VF getting a new chip; I only had it for less than 24 hours before it failed on me.
The Hana was perfect right out of the box. The DNA 40 with temp. protect works as advertised and I've had no issues with the mod. It all comes down to personal preference. Both have spring loaded 510's which is a good thing.
I feel that I'd be more qualified to form a better opinion if I spent more time with the VF. The form factor of the VF is awesome; it fits in your hand so well! But I must say, the Hana box feels nice to use as well.....IMO you can't go wrong with which ever one you pick!
The Hana was perfect right out of the box. The DNA 40 with temp. protect works as advertised and I've had no issues with the mod. It all comes down to personal preference. Both have spring loaded 510's which is a good thing.
I feel that I'd be more qualified to form a better opinion if I spent more time with the VF. The form factor of the VF is awesome; it fits in your hand so well! But I must say, the Hana box feels nice to use as well.....IMO you can't go wrong with which ever one you pick!
Thanks for all of the advice. Hopefully I'll be able to get one of these devices for Christmas
- Status
