I go by how my body has responded, no more horrible cough, shortness of breath, and no more high blood pressure. So how could this be bad for me. Its at least way better than smoking!
Concerns about vaping, sure I have them! Mine are more in this direction though:
[URL=http://s14.photobucket.com/user/1Peep/media/3yuf7_zpsd1df3f48.jpg.html][/URL]
I've read a bit about cooks getting long term lung issues from breathing fugitive oil emissions. Don't know if lawyer ambulance chasers of not. That is why I'm not vaping oil based flavors. Some of my fav DIY e-liq flavors contained oil. Not sure if bad or not. Probably a lot less oil than some cooks inhale.
You need to read a lot more on the subject.
Both PG and VG are vegetable oil in origin. They are highly refined products of vegetable oil. The refining process also removes the toxins that are produced from overheated cooking oils, especially sulfur, ammonia, and chlorine. While PG and VG are vegetable oil derivatives, they do not have the same characteristics of vegetable oil.
Think of it this way...
You wouldn't dare eat or drink crude oil. You know it's filled with nasty toxins.
But Vaseline, a petroleum jelly, is non-toxic.
Concerns about vaping, sure I have them! Mine are more in this direction though:
[URL=http://s14.photobucket.com/user/1Peep/media/3yuf7_zpsd1df3f48.jpg.html][/URL]
But Vaseline, a petroleum jelly, is non-toxic.
I'm always astonished to see the response this kind of questioning provokes.
It's as if every vaper was attacked personally. The reactions are dismissive and very defensive as a rule.
Is it so unreasonable to question the safety of vaping?
The usual responses are:
1-no matter what it's much better than cigarette.
2- PG is used in asthma medication, to create smoke at shows etc.
Personally I find those arguments very questionable. First how do we know that it's much better than cigarettes? How many of us have felt the bad effects of smoking after 1 or 2 years? It usually takes much longer to become noticeable. Second how can the amounts of PG contained medication or false smoke be compared to those we are inhaling while vaping? Personally i often vape close to 10ml/day. Don't think any asthmatic inhales anywhere close to that.
Why so defensive? I vape as said quite a bit and hope it's much better than smoking but to date nobody to my knowledge has demonstrated what happens to those large quantities of PG that I inhale.
I'm always astonished to see the response this kind of questioning provokes.
It's as if every vaper was attacked personally. The reactions are dismissive and very defensive as a rule.
Is it so unreasonable to question the safety of vaping?
The usual responses are:
1-no matter what it's much better than cigarette.
2- PG is used in asthma medication, to create smoke at shows etc.
Personally I find those arguments very questionable. First how do we know that it's much better than cigarettes? How many of us have felt the bad effects of smoking after 1 or 2 years? It usually takes much longer to become noticeable. Second how can the amounts of PG contained medication or false smoke be compared to those we are inhaling while vaping? Personally i often vape close to 10ml/day. Don't think any asthmatic inhales anywhere close to that.
Why so defensive? I vape as said quite a bit and hope it's much better than smoking but to date nobody to my knowledge has demonstrated what happens to those large quantities of PG that I inhale.
BTW: It's not hard to research. There's only 4 ingredients.
Try to research all the ingredients in cigarettes.![]()
Does it really matter that it's the first or hundredth post or that the person has an agenda or not? All that doesn't change the validity of the question no matter who asks it does it?
And to say that if we have doubts about vaping we should just return to smoking is a strange answer. As already said I'm vaping in the hope that it is better than the alternative and glad to see that studies to date seem to confirm this but again who felt the novice nature of cigarettes after only one or two years.