Homeland Security Busting Nicotine Vendors????

Status
Not open for further replies.

salemgold

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 5, 2010
28,155
63,784
South Carolina
How in the heck could this be legal??? Not that it has to be since our government does what they want to do whether it is within the law or not.

This happened to RTS Vapes

Had 3 federal agents from the department of homeland security visit my home and facility yesterday while I am on vacation. ... do they have to do with our US nicotine extraction? They claim they will try to get an arrest warrant from the US attorney for liying to a federal agent. The agent asked me, do you sell the little vials with flavor and nicotine in them and I said no. Then they go to my facility and find we produce flavorless liquid nicotine and think it is the same as flavored. I guess this is a new way for the federal government to go after companies.
 

Tanti

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 22, 2013
494
364
Nebraska
home land would only get involved if someone put a bug in their ear to make them think this company was selling bulk high strength nicotine that was flavored, and they are trying to poison people. That would be the only reason they would investigate. The question is who would do this? BT, ANTZ, competition, someone that wasn't satisfied. Thinking if they get rid of nicotine supply they can get rid of e-cigs. Its not Homelands place to control nicotine, that is the FDA's job, its only home land if there is purposeful intent to harm with a poison or chemical. Which we know in this case that is not so. Sounds like to me someone or people are trying to get rid of this company. Or the other thing that our government is starting within to get rid of the peoples ability to mix their own, but I really don't think that is the case. I wonder did homeland take any of the nicotine, remove any product?
 

salemgold

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 5, 2010
28,155
63,784
South Carolina
Last edited:

AgentAnia

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2013
3,739
9,455
Orbiting Sirius B

Baditude

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Apr 8, 2012
30,394
73,076
71
Ridgeway, Ohio
From the owner of RTS Vapes http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...nicotine-liquid-made-usa-286.html#post9946253, the federal agents got involved when they said he "lied" about selling flavored nicotine eliquid, which he doesn't.


"Had 3 federal agents from the department of homeland security visit my home and facility yesterday while I am on vacation. ... do they have to do with our US nicotine extraction? They claim they will try to get an arrest warrant from the US attorney for liying to a federal agent. The agent asked me, do you sell the little vials with flavor and nicotine in them and I said no. Then they go to my facility and find we produce flavorless liquid nicotine and think it is the same as flavored. I guess this is a new way for the federal government to go after companies."

"They are not saying it is illegal to sell flavored nicotine. They are saying I am guilty of lying to a federal agent because I said we do not sell it which is true. The department of homeland security does not know the difference between flavored and concentrated flavorless nicotine. There were around 20 other questions asked about the production of pure nicotine being a risk to the country because it is a poison."

"Curious that we refused a buyout offer by a BT company last week and this happens."


Just conjecture here, but this sounds a lot like gang-like retaliation and bullying by out-of-control government or BT hassling certain people in the name of "national security". In reality, it appears to be, "You just upset my bed partner (Big Tobacco) and now I'm going to get even with you for them." Makes you wonder if this incident would have happened had the buyout gone through.

Our government is corrupt (past and recent events continue to prove this) and at the whim of large corporations which seek to monopolize business in their self interest.

I still don't see why Homeland Security would get involved with this. Were they really federal agents? Or were they hired thugs with fake badges? The guy at RTS said they wore torn jeans. Not what I would expect from official federal agents.
 
Last edited:

salemgold

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 5, 2010
28,155
63,784
South Carolina
Why just this one vendor?

It was not just this one vendor. According to RTS, there is another large vendor that this has happened to as well.

Very well out thought process you state and might be right on. Looking for new attorney because this one advises to surrender business to stay out of prison on trumped up bull.... charges. Only good news is we have a major competitor experiencing the same problem and we have agreed through our common credit card processor to share a solution. This competitor is a forum supplier on ECF.
 
Last edited:

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Something about this whole story isn't ringing true to me, but I don't know what it is. Why doesn't RTS explain who was the "federal agent" questioning him in the first place that he was subsequently accused of lying to? Or if the lie was supposed to have occurred while the agents were there, what reason did the agents give for being there in the first place? Did they have a warrant or explain why they were called to his business/home in the first place? The FDA has its own agents, so why is Homeland Security involved in what is clearly an FDA matter? If the nicotine is extracted at a lab in Philadelphia, why were they at his business? There is no law against selling flavored nicotine in the US (yet), so what does it matter if he sells flavored nicotine? He obviously sells unflavored nicotine, so if this is a run-around attempt at shutting down e-liquid vendors, wouldn't the government go after companies that openly admit to selling flavored nicotine solutions first?

I don't know - none of this really adds up for me.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,616
1
84,722
So-Cal
Something about this whole story isn't ringing true to me, but I don't know what it is. Why doesn't RTS explain who was the "federal agent" questioning him in the first place that he was subsequently accused of lying to? Or if the lie was supposed to have occurred while the agents were there, what reason did the agents give for being there in the first place? Did they have a warrant or explain why they were called to his business/home in the first place? The FDA has its own agents, so why is Homeland Security involved in what is clearly an FDA matter? If the nicotine is extracted at a lab in Philadelphia, why were they at his business? There is no law against selling flavored nicotine in the US (yet), so what does it matter if he sells flavored nicotine? He obviously sells unflavored nicotine, so if this is a run-around attempt at shutting down e-liquid vendors, wouldn't the government go after companies that openly admit to selling flavored nicotine solutions first?

I don't know - none of this really adds up for me.

I agree Kristin.

That is why I said that I think there has been a Mistake or some kind of Mix-Up. Perhaps RTS was wrongly associated with the Sweep to Close Down those Online Drug Websites?
 

AgentAnia

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2013
3,739
9,455
Orbiting Sirius B
Something about this whole story isn't ringing true to me, but I don't know what it is. Why doesn't RTS explain who was the "federal agent" questioning him in the first place that he was subsequently accused of lying to? Or if the lie was supposed to have occurred while the agents were there, what reason did the agents give for being there in the first place? Did they have a warrant or explain why they were called to his business/home in the first place? The FDA has its own agents, so why is Homeland Security involved in what is clearly an FDA matter? If the nicotine is extracted at a lab in Philadelphia, why were they at his business? There is no law against selling flavored nicotine in the US (yet), so what does it matter if he sells flavored nicotine? He obviously sells unflavored nicotine, so if this is a run-around attempt at shutting down e-liquid vendors, wouldn't the government go after companies that openly admit to selling flavored nicotine solutions first?

I don't know - none of this really adds up for me.

I agree that the exact sequence of events has yet to be laid out and all the players identified. One fact that doesn't seem to be in question, though, is that agents from the Dept. of Homeland Security visited the RTS owner both at his home and his place of business. The reason for these visits is not clear at this time, nor can we be sure exactly what questions they asked him, and exactly how he answered.

But the fact remains: a vendor of e-liquid has been visited and questioned (and evidently threatened) by agents of Homeland Security. Whatever happens as a result, this is not good and needs to be monitored. That is this vaper's opinion.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,616
1
84,722
So-Cal
I don't believe Homeland Security had anything to do with the online-drug-website sweep. At least nothing I've read about it mentioned DHS. Curious...

The DHS is Involved with ALL Aspects of Any Potential Criminal Activity.

They are the Top of the Law Enforcement Org Chart.
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
Maybe someone should drop a dime on Fox News.
We'll never hear about this stuff in the "mainstream media"
:laugh:

Good suggestion and you are 100% right. Except, the mainstream media may distort the story to leave the impression that vaping is some kind of terrorist sub-culture. Would not surprise me.
 

salemgold

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 5, 2010
28,155
63,784
South Carolina
Something about this whole story isn't ringing true to me, but I don't know what it is. Why doesn't RTS explain who was the "federal agent" questioning him in the first place that he was subsequently accused of lying to? Or if the lie was supposed to have occurred while the agents were there, what reason did the agents give for being there in the first place? Did they have a warrant or explain why they were called to his business/home in the first place? The FDA has its own agents, so why is Homeland Security involved in what is clearly an FDA matter? If the nicotine is extracted at a lab in Philadelphia, why were they at his business? There is no law against selling flavored nicotine in the US (yet), so what does it matter if he sells flavored nicotine? He obviously sells unflavored nicotine, so if this is a run-around attempt at shutting down e-liquid vendors, wouldn't the government go after companies that openly admit to selling flavored nicotine solutions first?

I don't know - none of this really adds up for me.

The PA facility is a back up lab for them. They also have one in Charlotte. Randy stated that the agent showed his badge but would not let him make a copy of the numbers or of the warrant.

He also stated that he was not the only one that this happened to and that another ECF vendor went through the same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread