It is very misleading to claim there are more catastrophic failures with regulated (as if anyone has actual numbers in front of them) over unregulated, and then pushing out one of the known bad apples as proof that regulated are more risky then unregulated. It is bogus logic to an extreme. Yes, there are some poorly made regulated
devices, but that is largely a function of consumers demanding lower price points and unscrupulous manufactures willing to cut corners. Buy from a known reputable manufacture, and yes pay a bit more, and those issues disappear. Buy from one of the top tier manufactures who actually take safety seriously (ProVape or Evolv) and any comparisons of safety become laughable.
Comparing apples to apples, a well made regulated
device is far safer then any unregulated
device out there could ever be, no matter how well designed. It should be noted that most unregulated devices are not well designed. The people who actually believe that mechs are safer then regulated, are very likely the very people who shouldn't be using them as they have essentially lost touch with reality.
The problem is not that people use mechs. The problem is that it takes specialized knowledge and constant vigilance to use them with any degree of safety. They are not a common consumer good, yet are being sold as nothing more then a common consumer good. It is entirely predictable that people get in trouble.
Of course the romanticizing of mechs done by many on this thread is also part of the problem. Just take a gander at the mech porn on this thread.